Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,686
    Total Members
    11,691
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

The Jan 31 Potential: Stormtracker Failure or 'Tracker Trouncing


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

@Terpeast @MN Transplant @WxUSAF

Question... something I've noticed anecdotally over the last 20 years, when 3-5 days out we have models projecting a favorable H5 feature for our area...it trends north a significant majority of the time.  However...when guidance has a cutoff h5 feature projected too far south of us...it does not tend to trend north as often.  

I can think of a logical reason, perhaps if a cutoff is far enough south its far enough removed from the NS flow and not impacted by minor variations the models typically get wrong...and which cause the north bleed in these features when they are around our latitude.  

Just wondering if you have also noticed this and if there is something to it, besides just random chance and us getting really unlucky lately.  

Ill take a crack at it. 

I think its based on having a zonal flow vs an amped up flow. Zonal flows don't  generate as much precip and latent heat across the gulf coast states, so they don't build heights off the east coast, hence not as much time to trend north.

A couple other issues I can think of that cause south trends.

1. Northern stream kickers, which cause troffs forming in the ms valley to become positively tilted and swept offshore before they can develop.

2. Energy cuts off over the southwest US or Baja instead of ejecting with the troff in the rockies. This happened a few times in 2022. The result is either no storm or one that doesn't organize until way too late.

3. The retrograding ridge from January 2021. That was a unique one.

  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WeatherGeek2025 said:

last time NAM scored a big one was January 23rd 2016 blizzard, can it do it again? NAM gets into range in the next run let's see how it does!

 

 

Feen

I was about to say that the NAM didn't exactly "score" anything big for the 2016 blizzard, as every single piece of guidance hammered that storm well in advance, even well before the NAM was within range.  But then I saw your location and did wonder if the NAM pushed it farther up for NYC to get hit (I believe 24" fell there?)?  Honestly don't recall because at that point nobody around here was really looking outside this region.  And that was a much more predictable situation, relatively speaking.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Scarlet Pimpernel said:

I was about to say that the NAM didn't exactly "score" anything big for the 2016 blizzard, as every single piece of guidance hammered that storm well in advance, even well before the NAM was within range.  But then I saw your location and did wonder if the NAM pushed it farther up for NYC to get hit (I believe 24" fell there?)?  Honestly don't recall because at that point nobody around here was really looking outside this region.  And that was a much more predictable situation, relatively speaking.

This is definitely what happened; one of my close weather buddies lives on western LI and he was basically shut out on most models until NAM started the northern trend.  He went from expecting 2-4" to 1-2 feet in the last few days leading up to the storm.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buddy1987 said:

We cooked! What a piece of sh*t the GFS is...

I never bought it. I entertained it but nothing moved in that direction so it felt like a phantom. Of course I want it to be right but we've played this game a long time. I still see a relatively easy path to a 3-6/4-8 event and wont stop tracking that potential. We'll see how the next couple suites go...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

I never bought it. I entertained it but nothing moved in that direction so it felt like a phantom. Of course I want it to be right but we've played this game a long time. I still see a relatively easy path to a 3-6/4-8 event and wont stop tracking that potential. We'll see how the next couple suites go...

Honestly i'd be totally fine with this. Beggers can't be choosers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My stance on this storm hasn't much changed. Despite the amazing H5 pattern this particular storm has been a long shot. The best run of the Euro ens runs never got DC above 30% chance for an inch of snow! While the storm isn't set in stone yet we need to see some H5 changes by tomorrow at this time or else its probably over. Still hoping that personally I get the non-coastal to form far enough north to get some light snow.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

I never bought it. I entertained it but nothing moved in that direction so it felt like a phantom. Of course I want it to be right but we've played this game a long time. I still see a relatively easy path to a 3-6/4-8 event and wont stop tracking that potential. We'll see how the next couple suites go...

if I recall, our area got a decent snow last february from a similar setup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SnowenOutThere said:

My stance on this storm hasn't much changed. Despite the amazing H5 pattern this particular storm has been a long shot. The best run of the Euro ens runs never got DC above 30% chance for an inch of snow! While the storm isn't set in stone yet we need to see some H5 changes by tomorrow at this time or else its probably over. Still hoping that personally I get the non-coastal to form far enough north to get some light snow.  

 

Outside of that Euro fantasy run; nothing showed a huge hit for I-95 cities. Even the garbage GFS didn't get the amounts over 6 inches and it was on an island by itself.

People looked at the last storm and assumed it would trend north because thats what they do. But there was never any scientific rational for that at all. In fact we had a storm earlier in December I think that started heading north in the mid range only to again go south. 

If the best you got is "it will trend north" based on no evidence. You got nothing. 

  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RevWarReenactor said:

Outside of that Euro fantasy run; nothing showed a huge hit for I-95 cities. Even the garbage GFS didn't get the amounts over 6 inches and it was on an island by itself.

People looked at the last storm and assumed it would trend north because thats what they do. But there was never any scientific rational for that at all. In fact we had a storm earlier in December I think that started heading north in the mid range only to again go south. 

If the best you got is "it will trend north" based on no evidence. You got nothing. 

It wasn't 1 run. There's were 3 consecutive Euro runs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RevWarReenactor said:

Outside of that Euro fantasy run; nothing showed a huge hit for I-95 cities. Even the garbage GFS didn't get the amounts over 6 inches and it was on an island by itself.

People looked at the last storm and assumed it would trend north because thats what they do. But there was never any scientific rational for that at all. In fact we had a storm earlier in December I think that started heading north in the mid range only to again go south. 

If the best you got is "it will trend north" based on no evidence. You got nothing. 

People don't seem to realize and Im telling you. It rarely trends North if it is going south of Richmond.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MN Transplant said:

Sunday is going to be nasty with temps in the teens for much of the day and wind gusts at least into the 30s.

Things we do well here

-hot/humid weather 

-sleet (apparently)

-wind

-losing sports teams (even Caps suck now)

-sleet removal (D.C.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MN Transplant said:

Sunday is going to be nasty with temps in the teens for much of the day and wind gusts at least into the 30s.

      Absolutely.   With that low pretty much guaranteed to bomb somewhere east of us, there is solid model agreement in a strong wind field over the Mid-Atlantic.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...