Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,687
    Total Members
    11,691
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

The Jan 31 Potential: Stormtracker Failure or 'Tracker Trouncing


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

I mean given just how unusual it is I guess ya can't give up completely...are there any analogs for this result? (Not that anomalous things can't happen, of course)

I mean.. if it was over us I'd fully expect a 300 mile north jump. Happens all the time for southern NY. It looks like our storm and in the last 24 they go north. We can do that, right? RIGHT!?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buddy1987 said:

Bob, what are you thinking for our areas? Can't say I love the trend. I feel like as time goes things may adjust even more south and east. The confluence up top is hurting.

I'm thinking the gfs is overdoing it and our yards benefit somewhat from the northern stream closing off but not from the coastal CCB. Just a guess. Gun to head, 4-8 top end with 3-6 most likely. Will be high ratio snow on cold ground so we don't need a lot of qpf to have a nice event. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, clskinsfan said:

Is it possible to have a closed 500 on the GA/SC border and a surface low way out to sea like that? I would think as early as 500 closed off it would tug a surface low well west. Frustrating hobby man. 

Because the trough is swinging like a pendulum, slp organizes when trough is pretty positive so having slp way out in front does make sense in this case 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bob Chill said:

I'm thinking the gfs is overdoing it and our yards benefit somewhat from the northern stream closing off but not from the coastal CCB. Just a guess. Gun to head, 4-8 top end with 3-6 most likely. Will be high ratio snow on cold ground so we don't need a lot of qpf to have a nice event. 

What are you thinking for here in Dry Fork south east of you ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ephesians2 said:

CMC at 84h - a bit west and more negatively tilted compared to 00z

still has the two surface lows idea but the one on the coast is stronger compared to 00z and the one offshore is weaker

precip shield is slightly NW of 00z

At 90h the northern extent of the snow is EZF compared to Hampton Roads on the 00z run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

Because the trough is swinging like a pendulum, slp organizes when trough is pretty positive so having slp way out in front does make sense in this case 

CMC looks interesting. SLP tucked and precip shield getting thrown back a good bit compared to 0Z.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BornAgain13 said:

What are you thinking for here in Dry Fork south east of you ?

Probably the same but higher chance of coastal influence so your boom scenario is better than me and buddy. This is tricky and I don't have much confidence one way or the other. Everything has to go right for a boom so I'll reserve that excitement for the short range 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand why, but it doesn’t make it any easier to stomach that we have a 970s bomb exploding off of Hatteras and a historically cold airmass entrenched over us and we are gonna miss out. Just been a tragic decade for snow in Central Maryland. Sigh. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...