Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,687
    Total Members
    11,691
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

The Jan 31 Potential: Stormtracker Failure or 'Tracker Trouncing


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, stormtracker said:

Giving it another day, but seems like we're settling in on a solution.  Obv things could change.  Don't know how far our features are into the better sampling network.  But we're starting to get desperate at this point. 

Yeah, I'm still giving it one more day but agree we're running out of time

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Giving it another day, but seems like we're settling in on a solution.  Obv things could change.  Don't know how far our features are into the better sampling network.  But we're starting to get desperate at this point. 

how do we give up on this?

1769947200-lBZJKjKHpWw.png

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can run the trend over the last few days and see the revving up that put us back in the game and the subsequent revving down. It’s not a weak trend at this point. Leaves us hoping more for a sudden jump now than a slow trend given how close we are to the event. Not impossible but feels like we only win if there’s just something out there the models suddenly latch onto, rather than tiny adjustments on the existing solution from here. At least, that’s the case if the Canadian, Ukie or Euro don’t show something now. Preferably more than one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

How does that happen? It's just getting shunted east to fast, or is the block too strong?

Apparently a NW cut-off like that is very unusual. Something to watch as we get closer...

More confluence to the north this run. Saw this on the RGEM as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Maestrobjwa said:

How does that happen? It's just getting shunted east to fast, or is the block too strong?

Apparently a NW cut-off like that is very unusual. Something to watch as we get closer...

Upper levels are closed off so there will be a sharp gradient. The energy is in a tight ball and not stretched out. If closed low doesn't dig as far south, the entire mass moves north with it.  That's the most likely path to a dc hit. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob Chill said:

Upper levels are closed off so there will be a sharp gradient. The energy is in a tight ball and not stretched out. If closed low doesn't dig as far south, the entire mass moves north with it.  That's the most likely path to a dc hit. 

Bob, what are you thinking for our areas? Can't say I love the trend. I feel like as time goes things may adjust even more south and east. The confluence up top is hurting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LeesburgWx said:

I guess Norfolk really is going to get a blizzard. Makes the snow outside on the ground not even exciting anymore. I would rather Boston get buried than Norfolk.

 

Well that's just mean. US SEVA folks want some snow too.

  • Like 2
  • Disagree 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

Upper levels are closed off so there will be a sharp gradient. The energy is in a tight ball and not stretched out. If closed low doesn't dig as far south, the entire mass moves north with it.  That's the most likely path to a dc hit. 

Is it possible to have a closed 500 on the GA/SC border and a surface low way out to sea like that? I would think as early as 500 closed off it would tug a surface low well west. Frustrating hobby man. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...