Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,614
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

Extreme Cold, Snow & Sleet: SECS 1/25 - 1/26


TriPol
 Share

Recommended Posts

Haven’t had a chance to read the forums today but have stayed with the model runs; any thoughts on why the NWS maps are so aggressive? Well south of me in Toms River is still coded 10-15, and that just doesn’t seem likely based on the majority of guidance. Are they weighing the GFS more because it seemed to hold to a snowier outcome? 
 

Just being cautious? This is a tough one thing to pin down exact mix lines / lanes, any wiggle could shift totals - so logically surmising they’re just playing safe? Just seems awfully aggressive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

And the GFS was first to bring it back. For a time, it was the only model showing a big storm, but its solutions were dismissed on grounds that they were the result of initialization errors.

Yea I remember one model still had it... Lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, psv88 said:

The NAM is totally out on its own. The other models are trending colder and snowier. 

Seems they are mostly holding steady as opposed to trending any particular way. Either way yes the NAM seems to be the outlier now, although if it's the outlier 24 hours from now I'd take it more seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Winterweatherlover said:

Seems they are mostly holding steady as opposed to trending any particular way. Either way yes the NAM seems to be the outlier now, although if it's the outlier 24 hours from now I'd take it more seriously.

I mean the icon added 3-4”’of snow on Long Island. That’s a solid increase. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Volcanic Winter said:

Haven’t had a chance to read the forums today but have stayed with the model runs; any thoughts on why the NWS maps are so aggressive? Well south of me in Toms River is still coded 10-15, and that just doesn’t seem likely based on the majority of guidance. Are they weighing the GFS more because it seemed to hold to a snowier outcome? 
 

Just being cautious? This is a tough one thing to pin down exact mix lines / lanes, any wiggle could shift totals - so logically surmising they’re just playing safe? Just seems awfully aggressive. 

Depends on who gets the best rates in terms of the initial thump. Theres definitely a scenario where coastal NJ could get similar totals to NYC in this setup if their rates are better. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven’t had a chance to read the forums today but have stayed with the model runs; any thoughts on why the NWS maps are so aggressive? Well south of me in Toms River is still coded 10-15, and that just doesn’t seem likely based on the majority of guidance. Are they weighing the GFS more because it seemed to hold to a snowier outcome? 
 
Just being cautious? This is a tough one thing to pin down exact mix lines / lanes, any wiggle could shift totals - so logically surmising they’re just playing safe? Just seems awfully aggressive. 

I think part of it is that the front end thump should have some high ratios and people in here assume that since sleet shows up that the whole storm is warm now. The onset is going to be high ratio snow and could pile up more quickly than people think.


.
  • Like 1
  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing is usually if you are near the sleet/snow line the reality is there will be flips back and forth between snow and sleet and some mixing at the same time rather than simply hours of only sleet on one side of the line and only snow on the other. The models don't really capture this nuance I don't think.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jt17 said:


I think part of it is that the front end thump should have some high ratios and people in here assume that since sleet shows up that the whole storm is warm now. The onset is going to be high ratio snow and could pile up more quickly than people think.


.

Definitely; the thump will be fun regardless. Would need 5 hours of 2”/hr to hit 10, the low max of NWS forecast. 

Definitely seems aggressive to me, not judging - I certainly wouldn’t want to be the one making any calls for NJ / LI / NYC, just noting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tatamy said:

Check out the precip types on that model (RRFS).  The totals shown do not match that or reflect the temperatures aloft.  The snow totals are way overstated.  They are basically another NAM - maybe worse.

I’m comparing the ICON to the ICON. Its algorithms didn’t change from 18z to 0z. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jt17 said:


I think part of it is that the front end thump should have some high ratios and people in here assume that since sleet shows up that the whole storm is warm now. The onset is going to be high ratio snow and could pile up more quickly than people think.


.

This is it exactly... 2" per hour at 15:1 adds up real quick... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Volcanic Winter said:

Definitely; the thump will be fun regardless. Would need 5 hours of 2”/hr to hit 10, the low max of NWS forecast. 

Definitely seems aggressive to me, not judging - I certainly wouldn’t want to be the one making any calls for NJ / LI / NYC, just noting. 

Agree I think upton is being too aggressive and Mount Holly even more aggressive. They are probably being cautious to alert the public and will back down a little tomorrow if current modeling holds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tatamy said:

Check out the precip types on that model.  The totals shown do not match that or reflect the temperatures aloft.  The snow totals are way overstated.  They are basically another NAM - maybe worse.

It gets sleet from a line from Port Jervis to just south of Boston. If sleet really gets that far north it's hard to see how the immediate NYC area and coast do well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Volcanic Winter said:

Definitely; the thump will be fun regardless. Would need 5 hours of 2”/hr to hit 10, the low max of NWS forecast. 

Definitely seems aggressive to me, not judging - I certainly wouldn’t want to be the one making any calls for NJ / LI / NYC, just noting. 

That at 10:1 ratio... It's gonna be 15:1 atleast when this gets going. But how long that lasts is anyone's guess..

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • TriPol changed the title to Extreme Cold, Snow & Sleet: SECS 1/25 - 1/26

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...