Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,451
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Rnt1969
    Newest Member
    Rnt1969
    Joined

January 2026 OBS and Discussion


TriPol
 Share

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, the_other_guy said:

I mean its been BN temp wise and basically normal snow wise. But after last several winters its great. this hasnt been gangbusters tho

10 and a half inches of snow here so far this winter. That's solidly above normal snowfall to this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, donsutherland1 said:

This morning's snow squall brought Central Park its first measurable snowfall on New Year's Day since 1987. All amounts are preliminary and the final amounts at some of the locations could be higher.

image.png.c8b2aabef0e5d4339fd91a9a04d45fe8.png

Thanks Don. Last year and this year so far have reminded me a lot of the 80s growing up. Figures.

2018/2019 through 2023/2024 a good representation of the 90s.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, donsutherland1 said:

This morning's snow squall brought Central Park its first measurable snowfall on New Year's Day since 1987. All amounts are preliminary and the final amounts at some of the locations could be higher.

image.png.c8b2aabef0e5d4339fd91a9a04d45fe8.png

Thats just from midnight-7AM or the whole event? looks like its just the calendar day, BDR should def be higher. 

Also, where did you get that from? i was looking for climo sites snowfall totals this morning but the CLI wasn't out yet

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, donsutherland1 said:

This morning's snow squall brought Central Park its first measurable snowfall on New Year's Day since 1987. All amounts are preliminary and the final amounts at some of the locations could be higher.

image.png.c8b2aabef0e5d4339fd91a9a04d45fe8.png

The LGA number is a little suspect, especially when looking at the radar.

It's nice to see the Park getting two measurements in a row correct. They have been especially bad the last 4-5 years on the under 1 inch amounts, often times ignoring them or recording a T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

Thats just from midnight-7AM or the whole event? looks like its just the calendar day, BDR should def be higher. 

Also, where did you get that from? i was looking for climo sites snowfall totals this morning but the CLI wasn't out yet

Just midnight through 7 am. As noted some locations were still receiving snowfall. A subsequent update should cover the final amounts. Moreover, since I was showing only snowfall from the squall, that omitted the 0.1" that fell at Newark yesterday.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CPcantmeasuresnow said:

The LGA number is a little suspect, especially when looking at the radar.

It's nice to see the Park getting two measurements in a row correct. They have been especially bad the last 4-5 years on the under 1 inch amounts, often times ignoring them or recording a T.

That's only through 7 am. I suspect that the final number will show measurable snowfall at LaGuardia.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...