Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,957
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Cutters Landscaping
    Newest Member
    Cutters Landscaping
    Joined

May 2025 Obs/Discussion


weatherwiz
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Baroclinic Zone said:

:o

wild story out of Switzerland. This was not too far from where I was.

I can’t stop looking at it, but this glacial landslide is nuts.

The fact everyone willingly evacuated swiftly days prior is some strong trust in science.

IMG_4175.thumb.jpeg.d604e0a587ba3be98f901e7cba05c81f.jpeg

IMG_4176.thumb.jpeg.2e0348658d561397d4c091dcda023992.jpeg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, powderfreak said:

There's zero chance that type of full evacuation takes place in the U.S.  No way a geologist is convincing a town to get out entirely.

 

1 hour ago, weatherwiz said:

 Couldn’t even happen in Dante’s Peak…barely but not really 

Maybe, but in fairness people evacuate (or not) based on complex factors and circumstances. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Looking at Tuesday through the end of the week there remains a good deal of uncertainty with the mid-level pattern. Model guidance is not handling the evolution of the departing weekend system. As the cut-off low becomes more of an open trough in eastern Canada, isn`t able to easily move eastward because of the mid-level ridge across the North Atlantic. To the west of southern New England an amplifying mid-level ridge spills northeastward. Does it shift the trough out to sea or does it pinch off the trough into another closed low. If we can shift it out to sea likely a rather nice forecast with dry weather and warming temperatures. The other scenario, it becomes a closed low/cut-off and is stuck east of New England and may result in cooler temperatures and spotty shower activity. As there is a good deal of uncertainty, leaned heavily on the NBM. Which is leaning toward the first outcome, dry conditions and summer warmth. Highs in the upper 70s to low 80s and nighttime lows in the 50s."

You've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya, punk?" 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, WxWatcher007 said:

 

Maybe, but in fairness people evacuate (or not) based on complex factors and circumstances. 

I would imagine after several landslides and seeing that plug in the upper valley everyone would get out fast. The before and after is nutz

20250530_062335.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, powderfreak said:

I can’t stop looking at it, but this glacial landslide is nuts.

The fact everyone willingly evacuated swiftly days prior is some strong trust in science.

IMG_4175.thumb.jpeg.d604e0a587ba3be98f901e7cba05c81f.jpeg

IMG_4176.thumb.jpeg.2e0348658d561397d4c091dcda023992.jpeg

Quite remarkable. Luckily a relatively small glacier but none less still quite destructive and life altering for many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

Sick of the cool humid days.. These temps below 65 and high humidity days are killing my gym floors.. too cool for AC so the floors just stay moist all day with it being a garage gym.. 

you need a dehumidifier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Someone in NW CT to western MA and SW NH is going to get inches of rain.

Yay. 

Local farmers are already complaining about powder molds and stunted growth with some vegetables.  

If I was growing commercially I would definitely want greenhouses or hoop houses.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the Euro's dramatically yawing between synoptic concepts wrt that pinch low formulation... Doesn't lend to confidence it knows what to do, when the 12z run just yesterday morning had zero impact from that feature along with +2 SD heat intrusion to our region, and then the immediate new 00z had that thing completely shutting it all down and a 0 SD heat intrusion... :blink:

The GGEM has that pinch low too, but it conserves just enough progressive w-e aspect to formulate it far enough away ( and moving E) to not be a factor here mid week. Believe it or not...it may be a compromise and better solution ... at least through 144 hours.

The GFS is even more so progressed away with it.  However, I hate the run overall.   Longer read:   It seems to be fighting the non-linearity of the teleconnection signal - which is ridging over eastern N/A's mid latitudes.  It's got modest height anomalies, but it won't expand them into the correlation extent - meaning it's low balling it. It's drilling the westerlies through the top of the ridge latitudes, limiting the ridge expanse. Meanwhile,  I'm noticing the CAG low genesis ( TC ) down there, which is a feature not uncommon to the -PNA summer, whence ridging formulates over the eastern conus this creates favorable genesis period in the Caribbean gyre region at low latitudes underneath.  Near the Yucatan Pen and Bay/Camp. etc.  So It's like the GFS is seeing the the whole scope, but is shirking the ridge part of it.   The GFS has about .1% w-e stretched bias at all times ( sarcasm but true-ish) at all times - definitely used to, but has improved with that progressivity bias some over the years of upgrading the model.  This strikes me as possibly interfering just enough albeit subtle, nonetheless.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Yeah, the Euro's dramatically yawing between synoptic concepts wrt that pinch low formulation... Doesn't lend to confidence it knows what to do, when the 12z run just yesterday morning had zero impact from that feature along with +2 SD heat intrusion to our region, and then the immediate new 00z had that thing completely shutting it all down and a 0 SD heat intrusion... :blink:

The GGEM has that pinch low too, but it conserves just enough progressive w-e aspect to formulate it far enough away ( and moving E) to not be a factor here mid week. Believe it or not...it may be a compromise and better solution ... at least through 144 hours.

The GFS is even more so progressed away with it.  However, I hate the run overall.   Longer read:   It seems to be fighting the non-linearity of the teleconnection signal - which is ridging over eastern N/A's mid latitudes.  It's got modest height anomalies, but it won't expand them into the correlation extent - meaning it's low balling it. It's drilling the westerlies through the top of the ridge latitudes, limiting the ridge expanse. Meanwhile,  I'm noticing the CAG low genesis ( TC ) down there, which is a feature not uncommon to the -PNA summer, whence ridging formulates over the eastern conus this creates favorable genesis period in the Caribbean gyre region at low latitudes underneath.  Near the Yucatan Pen and Bay/Camp. etc.  So It's like the GFS is seeing the the whole scope, but is shirking the ridge part of it.   The GFS has about .1% w-e stretched bias at all times ( sarcasm but true-ish) at all times - definitely used to, but has improved with that progressivity bias some over the years of upgrading the model.  This strikes me as possibly interfering just enough albeit subtle, nonetheless.  

 

 

"Longer read:"

Do you have another variety in your toolbox?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...