Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,514
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    CHSVol
    Newest Member
    CHSVol
    Joined

December 2023


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, rimetree said:

Not worth much but Canadian has been insisting on basically no event...everything suppressed. Maybe a compromise would work.

yeah ... it's interesting. i've noticed that.    

there are signals in conflict from multiple sources. 

for ex, the NAO is positive (very much so). it is slowly dwindling down to neutral by the end of week 2 but in so far as what it properly should interpret, that is no help for winter enthusiasts through that period in question.  positive NAO modes support the left turning storm tracks through the Lakes. 

in contrast, PNA is hugely rsing. +delta to +3 SD.  a positive PNA state in latter D thru JF connotes a western ridge/eastern trough PNAP response.  doing so clear to +3 standard deviation?  that's too much in an index that covers a domain nearly a quarter of the planetary x-y coordinates to believe the western ridge/eastern trough PNAP response would ultimately fail.  we are seeing that, but what comes next is oddly empty.

it's annoying.  getting tired of looking at it and making excuses for why the table is getting set with fine china and stem ware, yet the operational versions won't deliver guests to the gala.   the charts should be lit up with a something  ... i hate to say, but the Euro solution from 00z ... ( even the fantasy range off the 06z) are not terrible statistically fits for this PNA era extending into the first week of January.  lacking cold air for the 29th thing but most have been on the same page with that.. however, the Euros deep coastal isn't the shared vision.  what a range of solutions, huh.  Euro coastal menace ( flooding inland, surf damage on the coast, and federal grant to keep the ski industry from a billion dollar collapse), the GFS with a giant busted ravioli of a cyclone that looks more like something out of the pages of an tortured April sog fest, and the GGEM with absolutely nothing.  

f-up morass in the guidance.   all i can say is that statistics support more than the GGEM.   that's about it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, forkyfork said:

yikes

 

You and I may be the only two individuals in this engagement of returning users that is willing to suspect ( if not anticipate) another 80 F temperature event in February.  I've seen this occur twice in 7 years, with a few other occurrences of at least 70 during Februaries over the last 10 years.  I also count the 86F heat in March back in 2017 as likely connected to the same sort of stuff/forcing.  Whether it snows in those FMA months is ultimately 'sides the point, there is an interesting signal there happening regardless - which has also taken place regardless of ENSO this or that.  

I don't have a problem with late Jan version of that - ... may not be 80 ( lol ) but 70.  I could see that happening.  Especially if we make it that far without a cryosphere over southern Canada. By then ... we are only two weeks from exiting the annual solar minimum period. 

It may be fun to yank the short and curlies of the winter enthusiasts with sobering aspects - that's not what I am trying to contribute to, here. seriously!  but I wonder about NH heat this next warm season. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got a propane full-up, 79.6 gal at $4.099.  genny has been running for 70 hours, and with the periodic 5-minute tests and a couple short outages since April, the gallon-per-hour estimate we were given seems to be working.  Called CMP because a neighbor on our short road had read that the road had power restored - nope; Sat. 10 PM was the latest estimate.  Burns a bit that folks on the tar road 2000 feet away got lit up last night, but with only 3 customers on our road, it's understandable.

Bright blue 10-15 mph breeze, mid 20s.  Would be a beautiful day were the ground white.  Family scheduled to arrive tomorrow, though that's not firm, but when they get here things will look much like their home in SNJ.  Sad

  • Sad 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

The first week of January could be quite intriguing with the NAO looking to tank and the PNA becoming more neutral. Ensembles seem in pretty good agreement in how the NAO/PNA evolve moving through the end of the month.

PNA is a lot more than neutral from all three accessible agencies -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

PNA is a lot more than neutral from all three accessible agencies -

eh that was poorly worded. I was just looking at the charts though, didn't look at pattern. I should have said that there is strong agreement that the NAO becomes less positive moving through the end of the month and after a bit of a PNA spike, the PNA looks to become less positive as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, tamarack said:

Just got a propane full-up, 79.6 gal at $4.099.  genny has been running for 70 hours, and with the periodic 5-minute tests and a couple short outages since April, the gallon-per-hour estimate we were given seems to be working.  Called CMP because a neighbor on our short road had read that the road had power restored - nope; Sat. 10 PM was the latest estimate.  Burns a bit that folks on the tar road 2000 feet away got lit up last night, but with only 3 customers on our road, it's understandable.

Bright blue 10-15 mph breeze, mid 20s.  Would be a beautiful day were the ground white.  Family scheduled to arrive tomorrow, though that's not firm, but when they get here things will look much like their home in SNJ.  Sad

My wife has reminded me we should have installed an on-demand LP genny, but we bought a Honda 7000IS inverter few years ago. Was pricey, but runs like a champ. In eco mode, I'm getting about 14hrs on ~4gal or about 0.29gal/hr. At $3.11/gal, that's costing us $0.90/hr. If we were using LP at an avg 1gal/hr, that would be $3.75 based on most recent tank fill. I know there are lots of benefits to on-demand, but I can't see spending 8-10K on such a unit for the convivence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, tamarack said:

Just got a propane full-up, 79.6 gal at $4.099.  genny has been running for 70 hours, and with the periodic 5-minute tests and a couple short outages since April, the gallon-per-hour estimate we were given seems to be working.  Called CMP because a neighbor on our short road had read that the road had power restored - nope; Sat. 10 PM was the latest estimate.  Burns a bit that folks on the tar road 2000 feet away got lit up last night, but with only 3 customers on our road, it's understandable.

Bright blue 10-15 mph breeze, mid 20s.  Would be a beautiful day were the ground white.  Family scheduled to arrive tomorrow, though that's not firm, but when they get here things will look much like their home in SNJ.  Sad

I'm in the same boat, when we lose power in town, there's only 4 of us on our street so we get taken care of last, they start in areas that get the most homes back with power first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, STILL N OF PIKE said:

What are your January thoughts if someone put another weenie to your head 

That things are delayed until about mid month for any snow chances in SNE. Maybe the 2nd week things start to turn. With no blocking it’s just gonna be cut city until then in my eyes.  I just hope it’s not one of those good 7-10 periods and you build up at least some pack , and then you wake up and people are already discussing the torch or coming warmup which totally ruins any good winter vibes and ability to enjoy the snow . I can see that happening 

  • Like 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Lava Rock said:

My wife has reminded me we should have installed an on-demand LP genny, but we bought a Honda 7000IS inverter few years ago. Was pricey, but runs like a champ. In eco mode, I'm getting about 14hrs on ~4gal or about 0.29gal/hr. At $3.11/gal, that's costing us $0.90/hr. If we were using LP at an avg 1gal/hr, that would be $3.75 based on most recent tank fill. I know there are lots of benefits to on-demand, but I can't see spending 8-10K on such a unit for the convivence. 

We went for the on-demand because we just got tired of camping out in our own house.  :D

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...