Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Late February will be rocking. February Long range Discussion thread


Ji
 Share

Recommended Posts

I do want to say good job GFS not showing long range snowstorms, for many Winter's now, in verification. It was not like that in the early 2000s. 

-PNA signal in February is a reverse-ENSO historically by May-August that year(higher developing El Nino tendency). Correlation is 0.4 to a +NAO April (-PNA February, which should be top 15 all time this year). 0.3 correlation to -PNA March. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are signs of a -NAO/-AO developing in the first week of March on LR models, with a +120dm anomaly over the arctic circle at 384hr on the 18z GEFS. I think initially we will even out the cold signal with -PNA/+EPO-even, but watch to around March 7/8-18 for a possible window,bridge between the Pacific/Atlantic. (10mb warmings don't always downwell to -NAO+time, but about 70% of the time they do.) 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

There are signs of a -NAO/-AO developing in the first week of March on LR models, with a +120dm anomaly over the arctic circle at 384hr on the 18z GEFS. I think initially we will even out the cold signal with -PNA/+EPO-even, but watch to around March 7/8-18 for a possible window,bridge between the Pacific/Atlantic. (10mb warmings don't always downwell to -NAO+time, but about 70% of the time they do.) 

70% of the time…it works every time 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BristowWx said:

70% of the time…it works every time 

I'm doing more research on this "when the NAO/AO go negative in the first week of March, the PNA and EPO will flux (- and +)". On 3-1, where the current D15 ensemble mean model shows a +300dm -PNA (strong signal), in the last 3 years we had a strong PNA signal on this date 3/3 times (0/7 years previous). 

-minus 2022

+plus 2021

+plus 2020

This is what they looked like 3.9-12

compday.SmfgOgc7lH.gif.e255d852a828c33d02ca39f8656c2b37.gif

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that actually happening now?

It appears it’s happening. The problem is, we have no clue how it’ll impact us, and models will likely be even more volatile than usual as they try to figure it out over the next week or so. Have a feeling models are going to be all over the place. Hopefully this SWW does what we need it to and doesn’t fail in disrupting the PV.
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, jayyy said:


It appears it’s happening. The problem is, we have no clue how it’ll impact us, and models will likely be even more volatile than usual as they try to figure it out over the next week or so. Have a feeling models are going to be all over the place. Hopefully this SWW does what we need it to and doesn’t fail in disrupting the PV.

So I gather that SSW effects (and the timing of them) widely vary and are usually difficult to predict?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • mappy unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...