Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

January Mid/Long Range Disco 2


WinterWxLuvr
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Heisy said:

Paging Dr Hoffman

Better everything this GEFS run, +PNA ridge, improved 5050, HP, SLP

You can kind of see SLP redevelopment with some HP bleeding down CAD areas
ff6269a6f2f26e281729bb88184e8aea.jpg


863663a47549cd135797d38d4867b39c.jpg


.

As long as the Euro still has it, this is an extremely small window to score something. Maybe a 24-36 hour window to get all the pieces in the right places. 

In a fast flow like this under a nina base state, this is a little harder to do than getting 2 torpedoes on target like Luke did against the death star. 

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, frd said:

 

Better score soon because record warmth might be in store for later in the month.  

 

 

Man I hope this ain't somethin' squashed south and they see snow while we smoke cirrus...then go back to warm, smh That would just be cruel and unusual punishment, lol But ya know on the plus side...we do tend to do snow then big warmth well...so maybe this one can work out :lol::weenie:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, nj2va said:

Wasn’t he also calling for snow chances based on the pattern in December?  Ultra LR ensembles shouldn’t be trusted that much.

Ultra LR ensembles wash out individual waves. And also could be dead wrong about the longwave pattern when it's time to verify. 

I'm not saying we get cold in that timeframe, just supporting the above reason why they can't be trusted too much.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Terpeast said:

Ultra LR ensembles wash out individual waves. And also could be dead wrong about the longwave pattern when it's time to verify. 

I'm not saying we get cold in that timeframe, just supporting the above reason why they can't be trusted too much.

If they could be trusted we would have been on the plus side of snow climo by now...instead many of us are looking for first flakes and opening the windows with the blinds partially closed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, cbmclean said:

Let's not hate on the LR ensembles too much.  The cold period that just passed was very disappointing, but it did occur, and it was reasonably impressive.  The current warm period was also well advertised on the models.

Agreed. The D8-15 ensembles have been pretty good this year at broad strokes (which is what they’re for). I’d mostly just say that another torch period in late January doesn’t mean winters over because no pattern has locked in very long for 2+ months. Not sure why that would suddenly change. But, seeing that look in late January does increase the urgency to get some snow beforehand.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple things to consider wrt the pattern progression from mid month forward. Guidance has the MJO moving into 'favorable' phases for Jan-Feb. We have these 2 areas of anomalously low h5 heights in close proximity(a trough bridge), which seems unsustainable. Natural progression is for a ridge to develop in between, and that aligns with what is typically expected given the MJO forecast. The GEFS appears to be doing just that at the end of the run. I mentioned this in my post earlier, as the GEFS extended continues that progression to a more favorable h5 look for the last week of Jan. Who knows if this is correct, but it seems at least as plausible as looking at a snapshot from a mean and claiming another torch is coming.

1673978400-8xCHtWX1CTs.png

1674216000-bEVAnI7FvJ4.png

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WxUSAF said:

Euro has flurries and sprinkles for this weekend, but I’m definitely intrigued so far for our D9-10 window. Storm developing in the Rockies at hr174 with a good HP overtop and a piece is the trop PV sliding through eastern Canada.

yeah, the stronger wave on the 12th leads to more confluence. the ridge upstream along the WC is amping up, too. this looks pretty good

ecmwf-deterministic-conus-vort500_z500-3503200.thumb.png.cceed3ea5057d9660e8aeea076d3b762.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Euro has flurries and sprinkles for this weekend, but I’m definitely intrigued so far for our D9-10 window. Storm developing in the Rockies at hr174 with a good HP overtop and a piece is the trop PV sliding through eastern Canada.

2 discrete threats next 7 days then a nice fantasy setup. But given the way this season has gone, we shouldn't get too far ahead of ourselves. Not saying YOU, just talking in general. Big dog setups always look good 10 days out. Usual caveats apply at this range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Heisy said:

Paging Dr Hoffman

Better everything this GEFS run, +PNA ridge, improved 5050, HP, SLP

You can kind of see SLP redevelopment with some HP bleeding down CAD areas
ff6269a6f2f26e281729bb88184e8aea.jpg


863663a47549cd135797d38d4867b39c.jpg


.

I said I was "interested" and that is all that is worth saying until we get it inside about 150 hours or so.  That is about the magic range where guidance has converged on the details that determine the outcome of these waves.  But from this range everything is there I want to see.  Its a good setup, pretty classic way we get a snowstorm really.  Just have to wait.  Keep in mind though, no matter how good the general setup is...even the absolute best threats are still way below a 50/50 bet at this range.  This is a good look, but that just means we have a 25% chance v a 2% or 7% chance of snow during any normal period at this range.  

@CAPE you're 100% right about the transient nature of our 50/50's but a lot of snowstorms come from that.  We actually want the 50/50 to slide out as the storm approaches.  A lot of our best storms came after blocking actually broke down.  There was no blocking by the time Jan 1996 and Jan 2016 happened...but the course of events was already set in motion.  There was no blocking in Feb 2003 either just even more lucky timing with the 50/50.  I am NOT comparing this setup to those, no one should expect a HECS here, although I do think this setup has decently high upside if it goes right BIG IF THERE, but just pointing out that a "transient" 50/50 isnt the worst thing in the world.  Very few of our snowstorms actually come from absolutely perfect setups in every way just because that rarely happens.  That's also why its frustrating when we keep failing with flawed but decently good setups.  Yea people are right when they focus on the very specific minor flaws that caused the fail...but by the same token we should be hitting some of these.  Our luck has been REALLY bad lately.  The we're due index needs to kick in soon here.  

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Heisy said:

Yea 50/50 actually overwhelms the shortwave, we want it a little farther NE. Delicate balance but at this range this is a perfectly good run. Just happy to continue seeing the same overall look


.

Tantalizingly close. I’d expect some nice hits in the ensembles.  If things developed just as the euro showed, it would come down the precise track, strength, and timing of the PV and 50/50 type low in Canada. Gonna be awhile before that is sorted. Lot to like about this window. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said I was "interested" and that is all that is worth saying until we get it inside about 150 hours or so.  That is about the magic range where guidance has converged on the details that determine the outcome of these waves.  But from this range everything is there I want to see.  Its a good setup, pretty classic way we get a snowstorm really.  Just have to wait.  Keep in mind though, no matter how good the general setup is...even the absolute best threats are still way below a 50/50 bet at this range.  This is a good look, but that just means we have a 25% chance v a 2% or 7% chance of snow during any normal period at this range.  
[mention=1005]CAPE[/mention] you're 100% right about the transient nature of our 50/50's but a lot of snowstorms come from that.  We actually want the 50/50 to slide out as the storm approaches.  A lot of our best storms came after blocking actually broke down.  There was no blocking by the time Jan 1996 and Jan 2016 happened...but the course of events was already set in motion.  There was no blocking in Feb 2003 either just even more lucky timing with the 50/50.  I am NOT comparing this setup to those, no one should expect a HECS here, although I do think this setup has decently high upside if it goes right BIG IF THERE, but just pointing out that a "transient" 50/50 isnt the worst thing in the world.  Very few of our snowstorms actually come from absolutely perfect setups in every way just because that rarely happens.  That's also why its frustrating when we keep failing with flawed but decently good setups.  Yea people are right when they focus on the very specific minor flaws that caused the fail...but by the same token we should be hitting some of these.  Our luck has been REALLY bad lately.  The we're due index needs to kick in soon here.  

Yea, agreed. At this range we just wait and hope ensembles keep showing intrigue until like you said we get this around day 6.

Verbatim the 50/50 this run is too strong, which is what folks down in the Carolina’s want, but not us…. Still, solid run the pieces are still on the table


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxUSAF unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...