Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

April 2022


bluewave
 Share

Recommended Posts

The new micronet shows how much temperature spread there can be within the 5 boroughs of NYC.

 

13th St./16th / Alphabet City 80 56 67 81 56 85 29 0.13 19
6:55pm
11
3:30pm
20.0
160 Ave. / Howard Beach 71 54 61 71 54 91 35 0.13      
28th St. / Chelsea               0.09 23
7:25pm
10
6:40pm
16.2
Astoria 73 56 63 73 56 87 33 0.14 26
6:55pm
12
6:55pm
20.1
Bensonhurst / Mapleton 85 56 67 84 56 88 34 0.34     19.7
Bronx Mesonet 73 57 64 73 57 89 38 0.23 28
6:50pm
16
6:55pm
21.4
Brooklyn Mesonet 81 54 66 81 54 89 32 0.29 36
6:55pm
22
7:05pm
20.4
Brownsville 79 55 65 79 55 88 35 0.28      
Corona 83 57 67 82 57 85 33 0.07      
E 40th St. / Murray Hill 80 57 67 80 57 83 30 0.14      
Fresh Kills 87 56 69 87 56 91 33 0.21 27
5:25pm
15
5:35pm
 
Glendale / Maspeth 81 55 67 81 55 87 32 0.10      
Gold Street / Navy Yard 85 58 69 85 58 82 29 0.13 33
5:35pm
15
9:55pm
19.6
Lefferts / South Ozone Park 73 55 63 73 55 90 35 0.14      
Manhattan Mesonet 78 59 68 78 59 81 33 0.09 40
6:50pm
19
6:55pm
18.4
Newtown / Long Island City 80 56 66 80 56 85 32 0.10 20
8:50pm
9
1:10pm
19.2
Queens Mesonet 77 55 65 77 55 88 35 0.09 37
7:00pm
21
7:00pm
20.4
Queensbridge / Dutch Kills 82 57 67 82 57 83 32 0.12     16.8
Staten Island Mesonet 85 58 70 85 58 85 29 0.23 34
5:30pm
21
5:30pm
20.0
TLC Center 80 56 66 80 56 84 31 0.10 26
7:10pm
13
7:15pm
20.2
Tremont / Van Nest 71 57 63 71 57 86 37 0.10 21
7:10pm
7
1:10pm
19.9
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bluewave said:

The new micronet shows how much temperature spread there can be within the 5 boroughs of NYC.

 

13th St./16th / Alphabet City 80 56 67 81 56 85 29 0.13 19
6:55pm
11
3:30pm
20.0
160 Ave. / Howard Beach 71 54 61 71 54 91 35 0.13      
28th St. / Chelsea               0.09 23
7:25pm
10
6:40pm
16.2
Astoria 73 56 63 73 56 87 33 0.14 26
6:55pm
12
6:55pm
20.1
Bensonhurst / Mapleton 85 56 67 84 56 88 34 0.34     19.7
Bronx Mesonet 73 57 64 73 57 89 38 0.23 28
6:50pm
16
6:55pm
21.4
Brooklyn Mesonet 81 54 66 81 54 89 32 0.29 36
6:55pm
22
7:05pm
20.4
Brownsville 79 55 65 79 55 88 35 0.28      
Corona 83 57 67 82 57 85 33 0.07      
E 40th St. / Murray Hill 80 57 67 80 57 83 30 0.14      
Fresh Kills 87 56 69 87 56 91 33 0.21 27
5:25pm
15
5:35pm
 
Glendale / Maspeth 81 55 67 81 55 87 32 0.10      
Gold Street / Navy Yard 85 58 69 85 58 82 29 0.13 33
5:35pm
15
9:55pm
19.6
Lefferts / South Ozone Park 73 55 63 73 55 90 35 0.14      
Manhattan Mesonet 78 59 68 78 59 81 33 0.09 40
6:50pm
19
6:55pm
18.4
Newtown / Long Island City 80 56 66 80 56 85 32 0.10 20
8:50pm
9
1:10pm
19.2
Queens Mesonet 77 55 65 77 55 88 35 0.09 37
7:00pm
21
7:00pm
20.4
Queensbridge / Dutch Kills 82 57 67 82 57 83 32 0.12     16.8
Staten Island Mesonet 85 58 70 85 58 85 29 0.23 34
5:30pm
21
5:30pm
20.0
TLC Center 80 56 66 80 56 84 31 0.10 26
7:10pm
13
7:15pm
20.2
Tremont / Van Nest 71 57 63 71 57 86 37 0.10 21
7:10pm
7
1:10pm
19.9

Chris, where can this data be found and is it possible to upload it to an external desktop program to save the data and to put it into a spreadsheet and can similar data be found for Long Island and other regions?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bluewave said:

Continuation of the big weather swings pattern coming up. Areas that were in the 80s last few days will have another freeze by Monday morning. This is followed by a storm system that could have higher elevation wet snows and heavy rains near the coast. This coming week looks to feature the strongest -AO blocking pattern of the year so far. Late April will be a battle between the -AO block and the SE Ridge trying to flex. This will probably mean more back and forth with some cooler back door days and warmer days if the warm front can push to our north. 


AF40FE44-7699-42D3-8DDA-D012FC4B7B47.thumb.png.f8a1e9cd8bd7a5f2d09bc57ef298ce55.png

C5709BBE-7942-418B-B0F9-22DCDCB94912.thumb.png.5d4f7dba476f4d593d0240b688a2d60b.png

8C329436-D2CB-47BA-AF58-7DAE0DA73170.thumb.png.b8dc3a864a591da8db804e69fc3b3cab.png

B815462E-DC3B-43EB-BAD3-E02DBA3FA502.thumb.png.614a05d3dea5966fce2033c0e86cb270.png

 

How close will snow get?  I will be in the Poconos so hoping to see some accumulating snow at 2000 ft just south of I-80

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

how close will snow get?  I will be in the Poconos so hoping to see some accumulating snow at 2000 ft just south of I-80

 

We just got NAMed with the 12z run. So we’ll have to see what the other guidance looks like. The other models have been more higher  elevation snows and the NAM is outside its best range.

1EE10772-C384-4BE9-8236-9EDBEA1862C4.thumb.png.88eb3aae2ccdb7b992c975df58cdc698.png

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bluewave said:

We just got NAMed with the 12z run. So we’ll have to see what the other guidance looks like. The other models have been more higher  elevation snows and the NAM is outside its best range.

1EE10772-C384-4BE9-8236-9EDBEA1862C4.thumb.png.88eb3aae2ccdb7b992c975df58cdc698.png

 

 

wow that looks like the GFS from about a week ago lol that someone posted here.  Accumulating snowfall to sea level based on those?  Temps in the mid 30s even here?

How similar would this be to what happened on April 19-20, 1983?  I keep hoping for someone to post maps and snowfall totals from that storm.....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bluewave said:

We just got NAMed with the 12z run. So we’ll have to see what the other guidance looks like. The other models have been more higher  elevation snows and the NAM is outside its best range.

1EE10772-C384-4BE9-8236-9EDBEA1862C4.thumb.png.88eb3aae2ccdb7b992c975df58cdc698.png

 

 

 

7 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

wow that looks like the GFS from about a week ago lol that someone posted here.  Accumulating snowfall to sea level based on those?  Temps in the mid 30s even here?

How similar would this be to what happened on April 19-20, 1983?  I keep hoping for someone to post maps and snowfall totals from that storm.....

 

Good morning BW, Liberty. It looks like forky and or Anthony found a way to hack the NAM. As always ….

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LibertyBell said:

wow that looks like the GFS from about a week ago lol that someone posted here.  Accumulating snowfall to sea level based on those?  Temps in the mid 30s even here?

How similar would this be to what happened on April 19-20, 1983?  I keep hoping for someone to post maps and snowfall totals from that storm.....

 

The 12z Euro looks looks more realistic with heavy rain for the coast and wet snow for the higher elevations. 
 

248FC180-C4CA-490A-9A50-2FDCA2EE24D4.gif.8900828423b8d1e3c36c08cecc54a71c.gif

4F2225A0-ABBE-4E3C-9A5C-42315648B51E.gif.91a53accd12300968cfce5a3f4fba26e.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

Nice

Trend south =)

Worcester only needs 0.5 of snow to avoid a rare defeat by Boston.

 

Time Series Summary for Worcester Area, MA (ThreadEx)
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Ending Date
Total Snowfall Oct 1 to May 31
Boston 
2022-05-31 53.6 54.0
2021-05-31 76.8 38.6
2020-05-31 44.9 15.8
2019-05-31 51.4 27.4
2018-05-31 96.1 59.9
2017-05-31 78.3 47.6
2016-05-31 47.2 36.1
2015-05-31 119.7 110.6
2014-05-31 85.2 58.9
2013-05-31 108.9 63.4
2012-05-31 39.7 9.3
2011-05-31 92.6 81.0
2010-05-31 64.6 35.7
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This continuing La Niña background state is on steroids. So it favors another very active hurricane season. Then maybe a rare 3rd year La Niña for next winter. 

 

Enough preamble—what’s the Walker circulation doing right now? I thought you’d never ask. It’s really feeling its oats these days, as several different atmospheric measurements tell us.

First, let’s talk Equatorial Southern Oscillation, an index that measures the relative sea level pressure in the far western Pacific vs. that in the eastern Pacific. When the EQSOI is positive, it indicates lower-than-average pressure over the west (more rain and clouds) and higher-than-average pressure over the east (less rain and clouds), i.e., evidence of a stronger Walker circulation. In March, the EQSOI measured 1.4, the 6th strongest since 1950.

As I mentioned above, stronger trade winds are key to the La Niña feedback between the ocean and atmosphere. The trade winds were enhanced through March, and remain stronger than average into mid-April. You want a number, you say? Okay! There’s an index that measures the near-surface winds in the central Pacific region of 5°N–5°S, 175°W–140°W; it was 4.3 meters per second (9.6 miles per hour) faster than average in March. This is the strongest March value on record, but there’s a catch—this record only goes back to 1979.

One more index! The central Pacific was much less cloudy and rainy than average in March. We monitor cloudiness via satellite, by looking at how much radiation is leaving the Earth’s surface and reaching the satellites. Less radiation making it to the satellite means more clouds are blocking the path.

The index that measures outgoing radiation (and therefore cloudiness), the CPOLR, tells us that this March featured the least amount of clouds for any March on record over the central Pacific. We’re number 1! Again, though, like the winds, this record only goes back to 1979, when the satellite measurement era began. So, a grain of salt with your records.

One last measurement today—let’s look under the surface of the tropical Pacific Ocean. The amount of cooler-than-average water under the surface increased in March. This cooler subsurface water provides a supply of cooler water to the surface, contributing to ENSO forecasters’ prediction that La Niña will remain into the summer. Index-wise, last month the water under the surface was the 9th coolest March since 1979.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Under bright sunshine temperatures rose into the upper 60s and lower 70s across the region. Tomorrow will be another warm day.

However, a strong cold front will slice across the region bringing showers and perhaps gusty thunderstorms. Noticeably cooler air will then pour into the region and persist through at least the middle of next week. The duration and magnitude of the upcoming cool spell could determine whether April finishes with a cool or warm anomaly.

The ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly was -1.1°C and the Region 3.4 anomaly was -0.9°C for the week centered around April 6. For the past six weeks, the ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly has averaged -0.73°C and the ENSO Region 3.4 anomaly has averaged -0.92°C. La Niña conditions will likely persist into the start of May.

The SOI was +19.54 today. That ended the 10-day stretch during which the SOI was +20.00 or above. The last time a streak of 7 or more such days occurred in April was March 28-April 5, 2011 when the SOI reached at least +20.00 on 9 consecutive days. Then, there was a brief period of much warmer than normal temperatures following the end of that stretch and a longer period of much warmer than normal temperatures starting about 2 1/2 weeks later.  

The preliminary Arctic Oscillation (AO) was -0.178 today.

On April 13 the MJO was in Phase 7 at an amplitude of 0.630 (RMM). The April 12-adjusted amplitude was 0.750 (RMM).

Based on sensitivity analysis applied to the latest guidance, there is an implied 50% probability that New York City will have a warmer than normal April (1991-2020 normal). April will likely finish with a mean temperature near 53.7° (normal).

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bluewave said:

This continuing La Niña background state is on steroids. So it favors another very active hurricane season. Then maybe a rare 3rd year La Niña for next winter. 

 

Enough preamble—what’s the Walker circulation doing right now? I thought you’d never ask. It’s really feeling its oats these days, as several different atmospheric measurements tell us.

First, let’s talk Equatorial Southern Oscillation, an index that measures the relative sea level pressure in the far western Pacific vs. that in the eastern Pacific. When the EQSOI is positive, it indicates lower-than-average pressure over the west (more rain and clouds) and higher-than-average pressure over the east (less rain and clouds), i.e., evidence of a stronger Walker circulation. In March, the EQSOI measured 1.4, the 6th strongest since 1950.

As I mentioned above, stronger trade winds are key to the La Niña feedback between the ocean and atmosphere. The trade winds were enhanced through March, and remain stronger than average into mid-April. You want a number, you say? Okay! There’s an index that measures the near-surface winds in the central Pacific region of 5°N–5°S, 175°W–140°W; it was 4.3 meters per second (9.6 miles per hour) faster than average in March. This is the strongest March value on record, but there’s a catch—this record only goes back to 1979.

One more index! The central Pacific was much less cloudy and rainy than average in March. We monitor cloudiness via satellite, by looking at how much radiation is leaving the Earth’s surface and reaching the satellites. Less radiation making it to the satellite means more clouds are blocking the path.

The index that measures outgoing radiation (and therefore cloudiness), the CPOLR, tells us that this March featured the least amount of clouds for any March on record over the central Pacific. We’re number 1! Again, though, like the winds, this record only goes back to 1979, when the satellite measurement era began. So, a grain of salt with your records.

One last measurement today—let’s look under the surface of the tropical Pacific Ocean. The amount of cooler-than-average water under the surface increased in March. This cooler subsurface water provides a supply of cooler water to the surface, contributing to ENSO forecasters’ prediction that La Niña will remain into the summer. Index-wise, last month the water under the surface was the 9th coolest March since 1979.

 

 

Yeah we can't really say the oceans are warming everywhere when we have such a large chunk that are actually cooling down.

How bad would climate change have to get to completely end this cooler water and make even the ocean subsurface warm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...