Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

Major Nor'easter snow storm (possible top 20) Noon Wednesday-Noon Thursday Dec 16-17, 2020


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

The thing about blocking patterns is that they're very stable. 

I don't anticipate a lot of changes between now and then regarding track. 

Plenty that can go wrong here still. The confluence/high could be weaker meaning less cold air, there could be less of a PNA ridge, the S/W forming this system hasn't been fully sampled yet. To me it's nice to look at and there's real potential for a MECS IMO but hard to really jump in until late Sun or Mon when all ingredients are fully sampled. But we've also had real potential fall apart at the end (2/5/10 for example).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what ultimately will happen with snow amounts but I do predict likely time outs, weenie posts, and storm mode interruptions over the next few days. Honestly I love we have something to track given the negativity about this winter thus far  before she even got rolling. Give me 4-6 right now and all is good. #lurker

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

I noticed the CMC is more amped than the GFS because of the way it handles Mondays wave.

I'd be willing to forego Monday if we get a bomb on Wednesday.

I'm still thinking we want a more amped Mon system. CMC suppresses it from what I saw. The more amped Mon system could flatten the flow behind it a little more and reinforce the confluence and cold air. You can see that the Wed system tries to hug/cut initially but is forced east by that confluence. Hopefully it can end up a little further north for our inland guys but keep the R/S line well offshore. I don't see a total miss here due to how vigorous the trough and wave is coming in-it'll put up a lot of resistance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jm1220 said:

I'm still thinking we want a more amped Mon system. CMC suppresses it from what I saw. The more amped Mon system could flatten the flow behind it a little more and reinforce the confluence and cold air. You can see that the Wed system tries to hug/cut initially but is forced east by that confluence. Hopefully it can end up a little further north for our inland guys but keep the R/S line well offshore. I don't see a total miss here due to how vigorous the trough and wave is coming in-it'll put up a lot of resistance. 

Airmass so good anyone NW of the low should be safe. Tuck baby tuck. We all win.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GEFS has improved from 0z. Remember the 2 camps I talked about? The eastern, weaker, progressive camp has shrunk significantly and is now a small minority while the stronger, west, amped camp has grown:

gfs-ememb_lowlocs_eus_22.png

The great high in Canada is preventing the amped solution from being too warm for the City and much of the coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gravity Wave said:

GEFS has improved from 0z. Remember the 2 camps I talked about? The eastern, weaker, progressive camp has shrunk significantly and is now a small minority while the stronger, west, amped camp has grown:

gfs-ememb_lowlocs_eus_22.png

The great high in Canada is preventing the amped solution from being too warm for the City and much of the coast.

Being this far north, I can dig the lean. Airmass being so cold so can the coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ericjcrash said:

Being this far north, I can dig the lean. Airmass being so cold so can the coast.

The source airmass is fantastic, most of SE Canada is below 0 degrees at the height of the storm. If we can get this to close off and deepen a la CMC, hence drawing in even more of that cold air, we could get an incredible result.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ericjcrash said:

Being this far north, I can dig the lean. Airmass being so cold so can the coast.

I'd normally :axe: if a low was headed into Cape May but this airmass we can probably afford it. The confluence would likely send it east from there. Disregard snow maps, from this range we're looking at the overall evolution. 

This isn't a fantasy model porn setup I'd typically piss on, for sure. I don't see a Jan 1996 out of this but still something impressive. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...