Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,674
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

January 2019 Discussion II


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
22 minutes ago, Randy4Confluence said:

Any signs of -NAO in the weeklies. Seems that's the missing piece right now. 

It's been all over the weeklies but it hasn't verified. The first period they had them was late January and it's not going to happen. The ensembles are finally showing some support for it though about a week into February. But I'd like to see it get inside 10 days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Regardless of what happens, I don't think that my methodology was flawed, it just hasn't worked out....yet. However this slice of humble pie is probably a good indicator that the attitude needs some adjustments. Comes with experience, I guess.

Ha ahahhaha...  OH man - not laughin' at you at all, Ray but that reminds me of what our Lab prof used to say to us jokingly up in my UML days:  "It's not that my forecast was wrong; the weather just didn't cooperate"

my god it's a dead ringer for that sentiment ... least I think -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Ha ahahhaha...  OH man - not laughin' at you at all, Ray but that reminds me of what our Lab prof used to say to us jokingly up in my UML days:  "It's not that my forecast was wrong; the weather just didn't cooperate"

my god it's a dead ringer for that sentiment ... least I think -

Lol I get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ray, I think the biggest problem is the fact that we’re dealing with a sample size that’s too small to be scientifically valid.  So being mindful of that should temper everyone’s confidence.  In my world, some studies have a sample size of >50,000.  I feel a lot more confident that the extremes have a much more muted influence.  And you still could be right...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weathafella said:

Ray, I think the biggest problem is the fact that we’re dealing with a sample size that’s too small to be scientifically valid.  So being mindful of that should temper everyone’s confidence.  In my world, some studies have a sample size of >50,000.  I feel a lot more confident that the extremes have a much more muted influence.  And you still could be right...

good post Jerry - unless he comes back with 1,000 points of enlightenment ...

Excluding that unlikeliness, I like your reasoning here -

I would also add (personally) to that discussion what he (Ray) and I discussed a couple months ago, about the hypothesis that the Pacific may vary SST inside a broader range now that the ambient Terran atmosphere is registering warmer in the full integral. 

There's a lot packed into that statements ... but the simple version:  we 'might' just need more than a modest Modoki warm signal to trigger much response, because the atmosphere is already too warm to be effected by smaller decimal changes...

It's hypothetical though -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, weathafella said:

This winter is increasingly reminding me of 1959-60.   Total ratter but March was full winter starting with a blizzard using the old definition.   I don’t expect that evolution especially since that was cold neutral but wx reminds me of that season.  I just remember being in the car with my mother after another rainer around 2/26/60 observing the clearing and left over scud on the western horizon.  The cold push afterwards was impressive and suddenly we wer off to the races.

I was just envisioning a 1997redux with us getting walloped at a point when no one gives a crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Regardless of what happens, I don't think that my methodology was flawed, it just hasn't worked out....yet. However this slice of humble pie is probably a good indicator that the attitude needs some adjustments. Comes with experience, I guess.

I hope you don't actually believe this, that's vodoo science

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Regardless of what happens, I don't think that my methodology was flawed, it just hasn't worked out....yet. However this slice of humble pie is probably a good indicator that the attitude needs some adjustments. Comes with experience, I guess.

It's not over yet Ray but predicting weather is a tough business. You got the broad strokes right but we've also have had a run of bad luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Regardless of what happens, I don't think that my methodology was flawed, it just hasn't worked out....yet. However this slice of humble pie is probably a good indicator that the attitude needs some adjustments. Comes with experience, I guess.

Yeah, don't be hard on yourself. As someone said before, it's a tough business when it comes to long-term forecasts. Just look at Tom (Isotherm), he's one of the smartest guys on here plus he does it for a living with energy companies I think, and you two were pretty much in agreement on this winter. You've had an amazing run and will only get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, BombsAway1288 said:

Yeah, don't be hard on yourself. As someone said before, it's a tough business when it comes to long-term forecasts. Just look at Tom (Isotherm), he's one of the smartest guys on here plus he does it for a living with energy companies I think, and you two were pretty much in agreement on this winter. You've had an amazing run and will only get better.

Still plenty of time, but I'm a straight shooter....I am frustrated right now. I don't like to keep shoveling BS in the face of reality.  Not ready to declare any outcome yet, though. I won't believe that Feb will fail until I witness it. 

I am strongly opinionated, though.....if this does end up being a bad call, plenty of criticism is warranted. That is the risk that you take when you forecast with confidence.

We aren't there yet, though....this season has been very similar to 1969, another one of my top analogs, and that season went nuclear in Feb. I think guidance is missing something right now, and blocking will be more pronounced than it currently appears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

I think if your methodology is solid you'll have success more often than not. Does it mean you'll be right 100% of the time? No, but that doesn't make it voodoo in my opinion.

Exactly. I know I rub people the wrong way with the smug posting style, and that coupled with the frustration of a crap first half causes some venom...but you give me the same set of indicators next season, then I'll go ballz to the walls again and probably nail it like I usually do.

The folks like omega can sit on that and spin-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Still plenty of time, but I'm a straight shooter....I am frustrated right now. I don't like to keep shoveling BS in the face of reality.  Not ready to declare any outcome yet, though. I won't believe that Feb will fail until I witness it. 

I am strongly opinionated, though.....if this does end up being a bad call, plenty of criticism is warranted. That is the risk that you take when you forecast with confidence.

We aren't there yet, though....this season has been very similar to 1969, another one of my top analogs, and that season went nuclear in Feb. I think guidance is missing something right now, and blocking will be more pronounced than it currently appears.

Yeah you are a straight shooter but you're damn good at what you do.

Anyway, hopefully you're right about February. I was staying positive until I came to realization that there will be a warm-up extending into the first full week of Feb after the arctic blast next week. Seeing that really put one foot over the ledge for me when it comes to this winter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Still plenty of time, but I'm a straight shooter....I am frustrated right now. I don't like to keep shoveling BS in the face of reality.  Not ready to declare any outcome yet, though. I won't believe that Feb will fail until I witness it. 

I am strongly opinionated, though.....if this does end up being a bad call, plenty of criticism is warranted. That is the risk that you take when you forecast with confidence.

We aren't there yet, though....this season has been very similar to 1969, another one of my top analogs, and that season went nuclear in Feb. I think guidance is missing something right now, and blocking will be more pronounced than it currently appears.

Ray,  I have never commented on your forecasts.  I don't have the knowledge base like you do so I just take one week at a time looking forward.  Your insight and time you have devoted to your forecasts is amazing.  Just remember that this is not life altering stuff,  if it works out great, if not so be it.  Just compartmentalize all that you put into this hobby against all the other important things in your life.  It's not that big of a deal.  Your scientific reasoning is solid.  This is why I love meteorology so much, just a dynamic and fluid situation that not the best human or computer can work out.  Take a break and don't' be hard on yourself.

Thanks for all your posts   Gene

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, BombsAway1288 said:

Yeah you are a straight shooter but you're damn good at what you do.

Anyway, hopefully you're right about February. I was staying positive until I came to realization that there will be a warm-up extending into the first full week of Feb after the arctic blast next week. Seeing that really put one foot over the ledge for me when it comes to this winter

I think that may end up muted...we will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the moral of the story is everyone still has a lot to learn wrt seasonal forecasting. Just when we think we have something figured out we get thrown a curveball...*cough judah*...

If this ends up a lousy winter after a confident call of epicness, there’s nothing else to call it other than a major bust...whether you think the methodology is right or not. With that said, everyone learns from the busts and keeps pushing the science and the forecasts foreward. You can’t get discouraged either because we all bust. Some are good at spinning them with excuses, but for sure we’ve all had some big fails. 

With all of that said, it’s still January so let’s not mail it in like the 2012 Sox quite yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...