Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

February is upon us - pattern change is in order


Baroclinic Zone

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, CT Rain said:

I mean are people surprised by this? A warm bomb was always a possibility with this setup. 

Some certainly are or will be.  Relying on dynamic cooling to provide your cold source in a garbage pattern is not a recipe for a huge snowstorm.  That's not to say it hasn't occurred but I'm pretty certain they a few and far between.  Let's shoot for a huge rainstorm.

CMC is 3-4" of rain here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thing isn't really synoptically different from the euro run yesterday. No need to make too many proclamations one way or the other. Possible it ends up too warm but I've seen this movie a bunch of times before too where it cools into a blue bomb as we get closer. (Mar 2013 had some runs where it was too warm, ditto feb 23-24, 2010)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dryslot said:

Been that way most of the season with a lot of these events as it gets cooler or colder as we get closer in, Not what i'm concerned about here, The block is causing me more of a problem like it usually does from the direction this is retrograding.

Yep. Wouldn't be shocked at all if GFS is too warm. This is still 5 days out. So everyone needs to remember that. If we get that block pressing down, it's going to help with drawing in some drier polar air into the system which will cool things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

Yep. Wouldn't be shocked at all if GFS is too warm. This is still 5 days out. So everyone needs to remember that. If we get that block pressing down, it's going to help with drawing in some drier polar air into the system which will cool things. 

That was what I was thinking.  With the primary over the GL we need that PV to do the dirty work for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

Yep. Wouldn't be shocked at all if GFS is too warm. This is still 5 days out. So everyone needs to remember that. If we get that block pressing down, it's going to help with drawing in some drier polar air into the system which will cool things. 

Another example of the cold winning out today up here, Didn't help many south of here this go round but earlier in the week, It was looking like zr here, Now its snow with some IP at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, CT Rain said:

I mean are people surprised by this? A warm bomb was always a possibility with this setup. 

:)

Kind of a loaded post here ... I think we all know, full well, that people don't readily associate -NAO driven events with "warm" anything ...  So yeah - people are probably surprised, chagrined ..etc... 

For that matter, there's definitely a predilection in this group of social-media users to filter everything toward a combination of drama and whatever offers the coldest ...most importantly to them, the 'snowiest' of all possible solution.

All that aside, I wrote Will's exact sentiment in that thread that apparently no one has any interest in engaging in ... that these events that are marginal in the mid and extended range tend to end up more isothermal right around freezing through the critical thickness intervals...right all the way up on up, too.  -1 @ 980, 900, 800 ... Classic early spring/spring modeling bias there..

etc..

We'll see... I find it hard to believe though that a GGEM type phasing and a 520 DAM depth SE of ACK would result in that much rain in the CCB ..particularly going from 540 ... shedding some 20 DAM of heights is hard to do without drilling a lot of cold down from aloft ...

Having said all that, I don't have a problem with warm storm per se...I also made it clear that's on the table too.. But, prooobably not happening that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...