Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Major Hurricane Irma


NJwx85

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If you look at the water vapor loop - a bit of a clue as to why the track seems odd, and what the WAR is doing:
http://tinypic.com/r/2uib23p/9

 

 

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/catl/h5-loop-wv.html

That last frame looks pretty healthy tbh. New convection flaring, while outflow reestablishing itself.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  The TUTT to her NW is modeled to dissipate.  Around that time the storm starts to get a more northward component.   The models have been delaying the decay of that TUTT with each run.  I'm not saying that is a major player in the steering but the longer that thing hangs around I think the more west the storm will go.  Might be a good barometer to watch as time progresses.  Plus the ULL coming in from the NE is really going to help evacuate the storm Whenever it starts to round the bend.  Might be why some of the models are strengthening it a little more.  It's going through some growing pains right now, possible ERC, trying to expand it's wind field, a little SE shear, some sinking air on it's southern flank.  The outflow has come and gone.  Mind you it's obviously sufficient for the intensity it's at but there are no real good outflow channels established yet, especially to the south.   I'm not buying into any model solution as of yet other than it's going to make it to 70W.  It's been a little lost in the conversation of late but the evolution of the ridge out west is going to be just as important as the other players.  When models start playing with cutoffs this far out it's been my experience that's exactly what they are doing, playing with them.  The few storms I can remember that were either forecast or did interact with a cutoff over the eastern conus around LF seem to be the ones that the models have the most issue with.  And rightfully so as the details are much more subtle in those cases than a typical trof swinging through. Models also can get the strength of a ridge with skill but the axis or orientation of ridges they seem to have trouble with out beyond even 72 hours.  The axis of these ridges is also going to be important if the atmosphere ends up in the predicament the models are forecasting 8-9 days out.  

It's also been my experience that the models have an east biased with fairly strong storms under strengthening ridges in the Atlantic.  I wouldn't be surprised to see a few more runs go west.  That doesn't mean the storm wont lift out. Still way to early to say it's gonna hit the conus just as much as it's way to early to tell the conus it's gonna hit ;)

Just my 2 cents, but at this range I think my amateur forecasting skill is about on par with TABD lol.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm beginning to see some interaction with Irma and PR/Hispaniola predicted by the models. Irene had some brief interaction with Hispaniola which weakened her down from a Category 2 to a 1. Once she made the turn North and entered the Bahamas, however; she regained her strength and became a Category 3. Irene skirted the Carolina outer banks (just as Gloria did) and hit Long Island. The difference is the models are showing that something is going to capture Irma and cause her to give a left hook and retrograde west. It will be interesting to see how strong the High Pressure to Irma's North and East is and if the trough captures her or kicks her OTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CaWx said:

Curious, what model is the TABD? How much money went into this model? Whatever it is, I will draw storm paths for half the price. 

It's one of the beta advection trajectory models similar to BAM. There are 3 variants S-shallow, M-medium, and D-deep layer steering flow depths. So TABD is the deep layer variation. There are inferences that can be made by looking at the spread between the variants and that forecasters use them in that manner more so than in making a track forecast from what I understand. I don't really know much about them other than that and I usually don't ever pay attention to them either. I did notice the odd track though. I do have some thoughts on why it yields that staggered track, but since I can't back it up with facts so I'll punt on presenting my thoughts here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TriPol said:

Out to hour 18, GFS has Irma weaker than it has had it in the past few runs at 974. As Jackstraw mentioned earlier, Irma has had some growing pains that the GFS did not predict. It will be interesting to see what impact this has on her track.

This was actually pretty well forecasted. Strengthening should begin by Monday and the NHC forecast reflects this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...