Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,603
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

Thursday Thumper or Thirst-Quencher


moneypitmike

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

MHT getting back into the game perhaps too. It's funny how those two cities are so on the line of 2" or 8" lol. I think the probability of at least 3-4 in ORH certainly went up though. Seems like it's a question of how fast that comma head departs.

RGEM develops it a bit sooner. Looks like models such as 4km NAM was just a hair later...does make a difference in snowfall at the very end. Models like HRRR we're even later. At this point it is a nowcast. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
7 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

RGEM develops it a bit sooner. Looks like models such as 4km NAM was just a hair later...does make a difference in snowfall at the very end. Models like HRRR we're even later. At this point it is a nowcast. 

Well I hope you pull some off. I guess even Kevin too. I'm pretty interested to see how it pans out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of the White Mtns and the Adjacent Maine Elevations this thing is a roll of the dice

for  N. VT (do they get in deform) could be 6 or 14 in Stowe

CP of Maine away from immediate Coast (BL torch?/Dry slot) , 495-ORH to FIT-MHT-CON same deal

10 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

RAP model actually develops the 850 low pretty far SE. It would imply that even areas like the 128 belt would see a burst of good snow at the very end perhaps. It is able to crash the 925 temps as the low passes over the Cape. 

One thing i noticed on the 0z Hi-Res Nam products last nite (not as much on the 6z that had a further east track and slightly slower development).....that a sort of backside Stinger was swinging thru Essex County close to 128 Belt around 11pm and dropping a a nice little burst. This appeared to be as rapid deepening was occuring and the low was just NE of PSM,NH.

http://mp1.met.psu.edu/~fxg1/NAMSFC4_0z/cld28.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, STILL N OF PIKE said:

Outside of the White Mtns and the Adjacent Maine Elevations this thing is a roll of the dice

for  N. VT (do they get in deform) could be 6 or 14 in Stowe

CP of Maine away from immediate Coast (BL torch?/Dry slot) , 495-ORH to FIT-MHT-CON same deal

One thing i noticed on the Hi-Res Nam products last nite.....that a sort of backside Stinger was swinging thru Essex County close to 128 Belt around 11pm and dropping a a nice little burst. This appeared to be as rapid deepening was occuring and the low was just NE of PSM,NH.

http://mp1.met.psu.edu/~fxg1/NAMSFC4_0z/cld28.html

Our real wild card is how the upslope tomorrow performs...I doubt we see more than 3-6" from the actual system.  But deep layer cyclonic NW flow behind it may be the real storm here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

Our real wild card is how the upslope tomorrow performs...I doubt we see more than 3-6" from the actual system.  But deep layer cyclonic NW flow behind it may be the real storm here.

per the Usual.

It must be surreal to watch the build up of these synoptic storms on the threads meanwhile you get 60%-70% of your  3K Mansfield Measurements (300 inches) from Upslope Enahancement that is not the subject of much fan fare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, moneypitmike said:

HRRR qpf continues to be pretty meh for western zones.  With low ratios, looks more like high end advisory than anything else.  It also continues the idea of a qpf screw zone through a portion of CT/eastern Hampden/SW ORH county.

 

 

hrrr_apcpn_neus_18.png

That's it's idea of where CTRV is. Shadowing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

That's it's idea of where CTRV is. Shadowing 

Interestingly, the snow map shows the valley where it actually is, so I think the qpf depiction may be something else.  Regardless, the overall qpf picture on it sucks for western areas.  As presented, some high towns in Franklin and Worcester County  might eek out a low-end warning with the crappy ratios.  For most, it's looking like a 3-5" deal.  Hopefully it's out-to-lunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, moneypitmike said:

HRRR qpf continues to be pretty meh for western zones.  With low ratios, looks more like high end advisory than anything else.  It also continues the idea of a qpf screw zone through a portion of CT/eastern Hampden/SW ORH county.

 

 

hrrr_apcpn_neus_18.png

in general it did ramp up amounts a bit from the previous run and the hrrr is also notorious for being too warm in the lower levels

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been out of the forecasting game for a while, but the more I look at this the more I wouldn't be surprised if the ASH-MHT area is in for a serious blue bomb. I don't think we'll know if we can overcome that marginal layer from like 900-sfc until it happens. Glad I don't have to make an actual forecast for this area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DomNH said:

I've been out of the forecasting game for a while, but the more I look at this the more I wouldn't be surprised if the ASH-MHT area is in for a serious blue bomb. I don't think we'll know if we can overcome that marginal layer from like 900-sfc until it happens. Glad I don't have to make an actual forecast for this area.

greetings fellow Nashuan, so I should be good for at least 5", before mix? is this done on major precip. by 10 pm or so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NE MA gets in the game if the low tracks outside of BOS and really deepens. The latest guidance is doing that rather than strengthening it right over BOS or even slightly west on some previous runs. 

So some of these runs where the low goes to town about the time is reaches east of BOS or the north shore is where a burst of heavier snow could happen there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, at least I know what my area (plymouth to CC)will get...I do not have to be the tortured soul. In MA, and CT, I think those with 800 to 1000 feet of elevation but south of the pike will see some snow, but if you have no latitude or elevation this is a no-go. North of Rt 2 special, ski country gem! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...