Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,653
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    SENCMike
    Newest Member
    SENCMike
    Joined

Winter Banter & General Discussion/Observations


ORH_wxman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
7 minutes ago, Johnno said:

Real, fake, faux, whatever you want to call it I froze my bag off yesterday morning in Bakersville,CT USA. Lol... just wish I had some type of thermo with me curious if it actually was -20, sure felt like it compared to Canton.

it doesn't matter the label it only matters to our pocketbooks and layers we need. I for one have a whole set of different building issues at -10 versus plus 5 but I know we radiate like hell at work next to Great Cedar swamp with a 10" snow cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ginx snewx said:

it doesn't matter the label it only matters to our pocketbooks and layers we need. I for one have a whole set of different building issues at -10 versus plus 5 but I know we radiate like hell at work next to Great Cedar swamp with a 10" snow cover.

Yea pretty much tough going yesterday blowtorches and jump packs/ generators were the tools of choice 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, powderfreak said:

My car likes the warmer nights with wind better than the fake cold nights of -20F.  

Fake or not it's usually very nice to leave my house at -20F at 750ft and get out of the car at 0F ten minutes later at 1,500ft.  It really makes it feel warm at the ski resort haha.  You can immediately feel it when you step out.

That radiational cold where you are getting diamond dust is the instant nostril freeze where it hurts to take a deep breath.  The mixed atmosphere seems a lot less harsh on those days.

Have not seen that since moving out of Northern Maine.  The St. John Valley folks have a saying in French that translates roughly to, the cold comes down.  Most prevalent in valley locations at -30 or colder; never saw it while we lived in the back settlement, 450' higher than in town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OceanStWx said:

For the record, temps on a night like last night are nearly impossible to "get right." 

The forecast obviously could've been better (night two is usually the better radiator than night one of a cold air mass), but it's just too hard to keep up with the local intricacies of the fake cold. On my drive home I went from +9 to -1 back to +13 all over the course of a mile or so. And those are all in the same grid point. How am I supposed to put that in a P&C?

I actually thought the zones read better last night, for coastal Cumberland (PWM) I think it read "Lows 1 to 9 above."

I had to update just about every hour to keep temps in line as they bounced in and out of clouds or a puff of wind.

That's been my experience - night one often has too much CAA while night two often decouples right at sunset, like it did yesterday.  Accordingly, I guessed I'd be 5F colder than the S. Franklin forecast for Monday morning and 10F colder for today.  Worked out closer to zero and 15 - c'est la vie.

 

Yeah I don't understand all reactions to local hollows being colder than modeled. No offense to them, but who cares in the grand scheme of things. Did life change because you were -2 instead of +9?

Bragging rights!  (of course)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tamarack said:

That's been my experience - night one often has too much CAA while night two often decouples right at sunset, like it did yesterday.  Accordingly, I guessed I'd be 5F colder than the S. Franklin forecast for Monday morning and 10F colder for today.  Worked out closer to zero and 15 - c'est la vie.

 

Yeah I don't understand all reactions to local hollows being colder than modeled. No offense to them, but who cares in the grand scheme of things. Did life change because you were -2 instead of +9?

Bragging rights!  (of course)

When models "feel" that return flow start aloft they like to stay warm and mixed, but in reality that weak WAA aloft can actually decouple you faster as it sets up an early inversion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

Good point. I've noticed that too. 

It's probably why the drop is so early in the evening too. Normally you need to really cool the surface to set up that inversion aloft and establish a decoupled boundary layer. With weak WAA aloft you already have the inversion and you begin from a decoupled starting point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

I'm just saying I don't see a huge deal busting cold on a boring weather night. I feel like the cold mongers are out in force with these temp busts. Like, "Ha....the NWS had me at 10F and I got down to -1F...they suck...yay cold!"  Just looks like a bunch of weenies getting their panties bunched up.

I don't think anyone was making a big deal out of it.  I certainly wasn't.  I think a couple of posters pointed it out and others made a big deal out of that.  I don't see what the big deal is pointing out a bust like that when the weather is boring.  I don't know what you would have done back in the 80s.  Sometimes we discussed mundane things like how thick the frost might be....lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MetHerb said:

I don't think anyone was making a big deal out of it.  I certainly wasn't.  I think a couple of posters pointed it out and others made a big deal out of that.  I don't see what the big deal is pointing out a bust like that when the weather is boring.  I don't know what you would have done back in the 80s.  Sometimes we discussed mundane things like how thick the frost might be....lol

We would have gone wild over 3-6" events...that's what we did in the 1980s.

 

A 1-3" snowfall was serious discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MetHerb said:

I don't think anyone was making a big deal out of it.  I certainly wasn't.  I think a couple of posters pointed it out and others made a big deal out of that.  I don't see what the big deal is pointing out a bust like that when the weather is boring.  I don't know what you would have done back in the 80s.  Sometimes we discussed mundane things like how thick the frost might be....lol

Thank God for Atari and Nintendo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CoastalWx said:

I'm just saying I don't see a huge deal busting cold on a boring weather night. I feel like the cold mongers are out in force with these temp busts. Like, "Ha....the NWS had me at 10F and I got down to -1F...they suck...yay cold!"  Just looks like a bunch of weenies getting their panties bunched up.

Its true, just like I don't see what the big deal is when the high is forecast to be 50F in April and we mix out and its 62F instead.  Its just routine temp discussion. 

I mean I think anyone will notice or at least comment on a 10-degree bust in either direction.  You don't think you'd notice if your low was over 10F colder than expected?

I don't think anyone ever needs to call out the NWS for busting as we all realize how hard it is to forecast little nuances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tamarack said:

Have not seen that since moving out of Northern Maine.  The St. John Valley folks have a saying in French that translates roughly to, the cold comes down.  Most prevalent in valley locations at -30 or colder; never saw it while we lived in the back settlement, 450' higher than in town.

You talking about diamond dust?  We had some the other morning.  Fully starry sky with the moon out and crystals floating around and even accumulating on the car.  Feels almost like a freezing fog but you can see it in the headlights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

Its true, just like I don't see what the big deal is when the high is forecast to be 50F in April and we mix out and its 62F instead.  Its just routine temp discussion. 

I mean I think anyone will notice or at least comment on a 10-degree bust in either direction.  You don't think you'd notice if your low was over 10F colder than expected?

I don't think anyone ever needs to call out the NWS for busting as we all realize how hard it is to forecast little nuances. 

Did anyone call anyone out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheSnowman said:

Wait........ the 80's were... THAT Bad????  I would have Died!  

 

 

Yes they were. Really the 14 winter stretch from 1978-1979 through 1991-1992 is unmatched in most of our region for its futility in snowfall. The ratters really out numbered the good winters...by about a 3 to 1 ratio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

No idea, it sounded like some were from the tone of the response posts.

Well there was the typical "they're terrible" posts. I know I was explaining if from the NWS's perspective how difficult it is to get a P&C to accurately show your backyard on a night like that. Unless we get grid boxes to picnic table resolution, it will never happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, powderfreak said:

Luckily that fake 2.5" QPF upslope snow event put down the 20" snowpack at the base of the mountain back in early December happened as that's what we've been surviving on over other ski areas haha.

It's basically anything that happens very locally is fake lol.  Radiation cold, OES/LES/upslope, downslope warming into BDL/E.MA, all fake in the larger synoptic picture.

Or is it fake if it doesn't happen in KTOLLA?  I like that description better, lol.

yeah, sometimes the upslope has solid qpf but that and lake effect (buffalo october event a few years back) is the butt of a lot of weather jokes.....as fluffy as several feet of lake effect is....I dare someone with a big truck to drive right through it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...