mitchnick Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Quite a difference between Gefs/Geps and Eps at the end of their 12z runs. Eps being cool to seasonal w I th temps while Gefs/Geps are warm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 4 hours ago, WxUSAF said: Hail Mary Is there a minimum salary requirement to be able to post here? 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, bncho said: We're BACK!!!!! Start the thread 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Is there a minimum salary requirement to be able to post here?Nope. 12 years old and above 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paleocene Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago EPS and AI EPS are both damp and cold next weekend. And potentially snowy, but looks miller-b with better luck to PA and north. Enough to keep me intrigued for another week for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BristowWx Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Paleocene said: EPS and AI EPS are both damp and cold next weekend. And potentially snowy, but looks miller-b with better luck to PA and north. Enough to keep me intrigued for another week for sure Guess that was fun. For a minute. Didn’t think about the miller B idea. This will end poorly unless you are in Scranton. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, BristowWx said: Guess that was fun. For a minute. Didn’t think about the miller B idea. This will end poorly unless you are in Scranton. You can see it here on the 174hrs ensemble slp anomaly map. Scroll to 180hrs, 186hrs and 192hrs. https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=eps®ion=us&pkg=mslpa&runtime=2026021512&fh=174 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 3 hours ago, stormtracker said: PD is tomorrow. In 1869 it was a week later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 2 hours ago, EastCoast NPZ said: Good thing we're so good at threading needles! You should see my grandmothers needle point. She has this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 27 minutes ago, BristowWx said: Guess that was fun. For a minute. Didn’t think about the miller B idea. This will end poorly unless you are in Scranton. Joe Biden is ecstatic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 36 minutes ago, Paleocene said: EPS and AI EPS are both damp and cold next weekend. And potentially snowy, but looks miller-b with better luck to PA and north. Enough to keep me intrigued for another week for sure The Miller B signal has been there on the mean for a few days now, but it has trended south on the EPS on recent runs. Discussed this in the other thread. Still a bit of a longshot, but still some time for adjustments. The window around the 23rd is also intriguing(maybe more so) with a Miller B look, but further south. The look up top is nice with HP to the N/NW and the 50-50 low. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BristowWx Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 11 minutes ago, CAPE said: The Miller B signal has been there on the mean for a few days now, but it has trended south on the EPS on recent runs. Discussed this in the other thread. Still a bit of a longshot, but still some time for adjustments. The window around the 23rd is also intriguing(maybe more so) with a Miller B look, but further south. The look up top is nice with HP to the N/NW and the 50-50 low. What else we got? Nothing so chips in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 3 minutes ago, BristowWx said: What else we got? Nothing so chips in 2 potential windows in a less than ideal pattern-hard to ask for more. The 20th is the longer shot for now. The window centered on the 23rd looks better, but unfortunately as we get closer the looks have become less favorable lately. We just cant know yet. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blizzard of 93 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago The window on the 23rd on the 12z EPS has a favorable Miller B look this run that could lead to a potential winter storm chance. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terpeast Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago AI gfs agrees on miller b feb 23-24, just a tad north. Something to watch for any favorable trends (if any) in the coming week. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blizzard of 93 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Just now, Blizzard of 93 said: The window on the 23rd on the 12z EPS has a favorable Miller B look this run that could lead to a potential winter storm chance. Here is the 12z EPS 24 hour precip & snow for the 23rd chance. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Blizzard of 93 said: Here is the 12z EPS 24 hour precip & snow for the 23rd chance. Definitely trended south as Cape stated. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER53 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago The 23-25th is real . Analogs say so. They got the early Dec one, wrong about 12/22-24 one , mostly got snowcrete correct. Blows the models away . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Because there isnt a NA blocking set up, the success of the upcoming potential events largely lies with timing of the vortices moving into the 50-50 space- they will be on the move and we need the confluence/convergence on the west side to flatten the flow some and keep surface HP in place. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, CAPE said: Because there isnt a NA blocking set up, the success of the upcoming potential events largely lies with timing of the vortices moving into the 50-50 space- they will be on the move and we need the confluence/convergence on the west side to flatten the flow some and keep surface HP in place. A Hudson high acts to compress the flow in a way similar to a block! It’s why there is a whole subset of snows I found when breaking them down that look a lot like (looks up) THAT! Problem is they’ve gone extinct lately! This setup used to work a lot! Lately they seem to all end up warm or north. But I guess we can roll the dice again. Had to work eventually right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 38 minutes ago, psuhoffman said: A Hudson high acts to compress the flow in a way similar to a block! It’s why there is a whole subset of snows I found when breaking them down that look a lot like (looks up) THAT! Problem is they’ve gone extinct lately! This setup used to work a lot! Lately they seem to all end up warm or north. But I guess we can roll the dice again. Had to work eventually right? Is the subset of Hudson high snows focused around late Feb? Climo would suggest better odds in January, but what do I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bncho Posted 58 minutes ago Share Posted 58 minutes ago 42 minutes ago, psuhoffman said: A Hudson high acts to compress the flow in a way similar to a block! It’s why there is a whole subset of snows I found when breaking them down that look a lot like (looks up) THAT! Problem is they’ve gone extinct lately! This setup used to work a lot! Lately they seem to all end up warm or north. But I guess we can roll the dice again. Had to work eventually right? I always thought of a Hudson High as a super southwest based -NAO… would you agree? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisy Posted 51 minutes ago Share Posted 51 minutes ago A Hudson high acts to compress the flow in a way similar to a block! It’s why there is a whole subset of snows I found when breaking them down that look a lot like (looks up) THAT! Problem is they’ve gone extinct lately! This setup used to work a lot! Lately they seem to all end up warm or north. But I guess we can roll the dice again. Had to work eventually right? Didn’t see it posted, but 18z euro op looked potent end of run, strong main shortwave, there was a ULL NW of Maine about to swing SE and nice compressed flow ahead of our shortwave 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blizzard of 93 Posted 49 minutes ago Share Posted 49 minutes ago 18z Euro AI has the 23rd chance. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blizzard of 93 Posted 46 minutes ago Share Posted 46 minutes ago 18z GFS AI & 18z GEFS AI also have the 23rd chance. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted just now Share Posted just now 55 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said: Is the subset of Hudson high snows focused around late Feb? Climo would suggest better odds in January, but what do I know. There were several examples in February, most notably one in mid Feb 1997 that was a 6-8" snowfall across Maryland in what was an otherwise god awful pac puke pattern. There were a couple examples in March also. Actually seems there was a pretty even distribution with one in November and a couple December events...January did have the most with 4. But a lot of those fringe season ones were a LONG time ago so... Here is an amazing stat....3 of the 88 5" snowstorms from 1948-2020 in Baltimore had every single index WRONG! Obviously 3/88 is a super minority but the fact is we even used to snow when EVERYTHING was wrong if we got lucky enough! Now Chuck is trying to convince us if one of 4 or 2 of 4 factors are bad...its game over, which lately it has been...but he also says we shouldn't think anything has changed. Below is the index breakdown of all of Baltimores warning snowfalls from 1948-2019 and you can see there are quite a few where 1 or even 2 of the indexes are hostile including plenty of hostile EPO/PNA patterns. Obviously there was MORE snow when everything was good...but it wasn't as radically necessary to have a perfect pattern historically as it has been lately where if one or two things go wrong the whole thing goes to hell in a hand basket fast! EPO/PNA/AO/NAO - - - - 16 + + - - 13 - + - - 11 + - - - 10 - - + + 9 + + + + 6 - + + + 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now