Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,602
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

Late February/Early March 2026 Mid-Long Range


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Paleocene said:

EPS and AI EPS are both damp and cold next weekend. And potentially snowy, but looks miller-b with better luck to PA and north. Enough to keep me intrigued for another week for sure

Guess that was fun.  For a minute.  Didn’t think about the miller B idea.  This will end poorly unless you are in Scranton. 

  • sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BristowWx said:

Guess that was fun.  For a minute.  Didn’t think about the miller B idea.  This will end poorly unless you are in Scranton. 

You can see it here on the 174hrs ensemble slp anomaly map. Scroll to 180hrs, 186hrs and 192hrs.

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=eps&region=us&pkg=mslpa&runtime=2026021512&fh=174

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Paleocene said:

EPS and AI EPS are both damp and cold next weekend. And potentially snowy, but looks miller-b with better luck to PA and north. Enough to keep me intrigued for another week for sure

The Miller B signal has been there on the mean for a few days now, but it has trended south on the EPS on recent runs. Discussed this in the other thread. Still a bit of a longshot, but still some time for adjustments.

1771621200-n3vDxDsPG6Q.png

The window around the 23rd is also intriguing(maybe more so) with a Miller B look, but further south. The look up top is nice with HP to the N/NW and the 50-50 low.

1771804800-g5td4b6uw7g.png

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CAPE said:

The Miller B signal has been there on the mean for a few days now, but it has trended south on the EPS on recent runs. Discussed this in the other thread. Still a bit of a longshot, but still some time for adjustments.

1771621200-n3vDxDsPG6Q.png

The window around the 23rd is also intriguing(maybe more so) with a Miller B look, but further south. The look up top is nice with HP to the N/NW and the 50-50 low.

1771804800-g5td4b6uw7g.png

 

What else we got?  Nothing so chips in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BristowWx said:

What else we got?  Nothing so chips in

2 potential windows in a less than ideal pattern-hard to ask for more. The 20th is the longer shot for now. The window centered on the 23rd looks better, but unfortunately as we get closer the looks have become less favorable lately. We just cant know yet.

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because there isnt a NA blocking set up, the success of the upcoming potential events largely lies with timing of the vortices moving into the 50-50 space- they will be on the move and we need the confluence/convergence on the west side to flatten the flow some and keep surface HP in place.

1771621200-wP7ZOeGWW24.png

1771804800-phLgFs5htyg.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CAPE said:

Because there isnt a NA blocking set up, the success of the upcoming potential events largely lies with timing of the vortices moving into the 50-50 space- they will be on the move and we need the confluence/convergence on the west side to flatten the flow some and keep surface HP in place.

1771621200-wP7ZOeGWW24.png

1771804800-phLgFs5htyg.png

A Hudson high acts to compress the flow in a way similar to a block!  It’s why there is a whole subset of snows I found when breaking them down that look a lot like (looks up) THAT!    
 

Problem is they’ve gone extinct lately!  This setup used to work a lot!  Lately they seem to all end up warm or north. But I guess we can roll the dice again. Had to work eventually right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

A Hudson high acts to compress the flow in a way similar to a block!  It’s why there is a whole subset of snows I found when breaking them down that look a lot like (looks up) THAT!    
 

Problem is they’ve gone extinct lately!  This setup used to work a lot!  Lately they seem to all end up warm or north. But I guess we can roll the dice again. Had to work eventually right? 

Is the subset of Hudson high snows focused around late Feb? Climo would suggest better odds in January, but what do I know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

A Hudson high acts to compress the flow in a way similar to a block!  It’s why there is a whole subset of snows I found when breaking them down that look a lot like (looks up) THAT!    
 

Problem is they’ve gone extinct lately!  This setup used to work a lot!  Lately they seem to all end up warm or north. But I guess we can roll the dice again. Had to work eventually right? 

I always thought of a Hudson High as a super southwest based -NAO… would you agree?

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Hudson high acts to compress the flow in a way similar to a block!  It’s why there is a whole subset of snows I found when breaking them down that look a lot like (looks up) THAT!    
 
Problem is they’ve gone extinct lately!  This setup used to work a lot!  Lately they seem to all end up warm or north. But I guess we can roll the dice again. Had to work eventually right? 

Didn’t see it posted, but 18z euro op looked potent end of run, strong main shortwave, there was a ULL NW of Maine about to swing SE and nice compressed flow ahead of our shortwave

87f9aa78fd198c752f5f57e3be99e958.jpg
e83d75f65f727269c4c24bb53593534e.jpg
  • Like 2
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

Is the subset of Hudson high snows focused around late Feb? Climo would suggest better odds in January, but what do I know. 

 

There were several examples in February, most notably one in mid Feb 1997 that was a 6-8" snowfall across Maryland in what was an otherwise god awful pac puke pattern.  There were a couple examples in March also.  Actually seems there was a pretty even distribution with one in November and a couple December events...January did have the most with 4.  But a lot of those fringe season ones were a LONG time ago so... 

 

Here is an amazing stat....3 of the 88 5" snowstorms from 1948-2020 in Baltimore had every single index WRONG!  Obviously 3/88 is a super minority but the fact is we even used to snow when EVERYTHING was wrong if we got lucky enough!  Now Chuck is trying to convince us if one of 4 or 2 of 4 factors are bad...its game over, which lately it has been...but he also says we shouldn't think anything has changed. 

 

Below is the index breakdown of all of Baltimores warning snowfalls from 1948-2019 and you can see there are quite a few where 1 or even 2 of the indexes are hostile including plenty of hostile EPO/PNA patterns.  Obviously there was MORE snow when everything was good...but it wasn't as radically necessary to have a perfect pattern historically as it has been lately where if one or two things go wrong the whole thing goes to hell in a hand basket fast!  

 

                      EPO/PNA/AO/NAO

         
- - - - 16
+ + - - 13
- + - - 11
+ - - - 10
- - + + 9
+ + + + 6
- + + +

3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...