rjvanals Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Euro is so frustrating since w heavier precip we’d probably get snow even into the metros w surface temps of 34 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, 87storms said: Lol nice. I only had the 2014 2 door sport s (anvil) but I remember my aunt had a 96 (around that year) red grand Cherokee and it was awesome. I drove it a few times. Those Stellantis prices, though. What are your thoughts on the current base Wranglers with the steel rims? I feel like they look a bit cheap, but I guess they’re more rugged? No idea lol. At some point I will be looking to upgrade. Getting close to 120k miles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 19 minutes ago, rjvanals said: Euro is so frustrating since w heavier precip we’d probably get snow even into the metros w surface temps of 34 So serious analysis. It’s close. Boundary temps are the only issue. Places NW of 95 in MD are at 34-35 during the height of the storm with .25-.35 qpf across guidance now. If the storm were to amp say 2mb deeper and that became .5 qpf it would be enough to flip to a 1-3” snow. 4mb and .75 qpf and its a 3-5” wet snow! It’s that close. The track is perfect. But our temps are torched at the surface so we need a stronger storm to max dynamic cooling 2 degrees more than current progs. How likely is this? 10-20%. Getting that amount of error isn’t unlikely but unfortunately it’s more likely to be in the other direction. Models have a slight over amp bias and a +qpf bias. So we’re rooting for a bust that goes the opposite way or typical errors! Not impossible. There have been examples. It’s not totally dead. But it’s on life support and we need some world class surgeon to swoop in and perform a miracle surgery. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted 31 minutes ago Share Posted 31 minutes ago NAM is a decent rainer for all of us. Which we need badly. Is what it is. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted 26 minutes ago Share Posted 26 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, clskinsfan said: NAM is a decent rainer for all of us. Which we need badly. Is what it is. I want my 2 degrees back damnit! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted 7 minutes ago Share Posted 7 minutes ago Every model in the past 3 days gave us accumulating snow but in the end the least snowiest model always wins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted 2 minutes ago Share Posted 2 minutes ago Strong -PNA's and +EPO downstream effect is underestimated in the medium range by all models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now