Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,484
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RHiggins
    Newest Member
    RHiggins
    Joined

First Legit Storm Potential of the Season Upon Us


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, WxWatcher007 said:

High of 34.3 here. Down to 33.1 now with the snow picking back up. 

I think we're probably fine in CT tomorrow with temps. May be a bit more dicey to our east at least for a bit. 

Ya, we good inland here in CT….just bring the qpf. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WxWatcher007 said:

High of 34.3 here. Down to 33.1 now with the snow picking back up. 

I think we're probably fine in CT tomorrow with temps. May be a bit more dicey to our east at least for a bit. 

The impact of the profile farther east would be on the ratios...that snow is going to be quite heavy and wet and I could certainly see some concerns for scattered power outages. One thing I'll say too about tomorrow (and this is a big plus for everyone) is that DGZ is very deep (similar to today), it will not take much lift to really produce good dendrites and that will be a big player where you have the colder profile. 

I think there is going to be a zone of 8-12" somewhere which will be the max jackpot and I think that could end up being the CTRV...there will be a secondary jackpot of about 6-9" somewhere in eastern MA with totals lowered due to the wetter snow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, vortex95 said:

I am not impressed overall w/ this event, despite the storm further NW.

MOS shows sfc temps 34-38 F for most of the event across much of CT, all of RI, eastern MA, and Cape Cod.  And precip intensity is not nuts (best 6 hr LEQ amount on the HRRR I see is .50" over the outer Cape), so despite the cold 850 and 925, the BL remains a big problem.

There is zero high pressure to our N.  In fact, it is one big trough from Labrador to the Great Lakes.  This is rare for a coastal storm, and key for ptype in this event.  So the low-level cold is limited, and more importantly, there is no solid N or NE sfc/BL wind to constantly drain the cold air to the N into SNE during the event.  Winds are going to be rather light for a coastal storm, relatively speaking, so this is going to cause issues.

Just before the precip starts in BOS on the NAM, the BL wind is 24011 and 6 hr later it is 1404.  Does that look like a wind direction/trend that is conducive to significant snowfall?  Also BOS buoy SST is 42 F.  W/o solid ageostrophic flow and a mechanism to drain low-level cold air from the N into the heavier precip area, again, this is a big problem for ptype.  You need this to offset relatively mild ocean temps.

And what falls and SOG is likely to be quite different in many areas.

So I would temper expectations here.  Not a big storm (MEH for central pressure and deepening rate) and really no different than the piecemeal, nickel and dime events for snowfall we have dealt w/ so far this winter. 

 

All about rates for eastern zones imho….hard to have major ptype issues if 925 is like -3 with good rates. If the rates are crappy, it will be white rain. But as I always say, “if the rates are so crappy you can’t snow in that thermal profile, you weren’t missing out on much anyway.” 
 

 

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

You actually have to wonder if the heaviest banding may actually occur right over the CT River lmao. This could be a setup where its displaced more northwest than what models indicate 

IF the midlevels get cranking, it's usually near the QPF gradient as a crude rule-of-thumb.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weathafella said:

I’ve been trying to get a good reason to toss the AIs and no one could give anything logical.  All hale the Skynets!

Well ... for starters, I gave you plenty - and so did others:   no one can (apparently) define the discrete processes in the construct of these tools.   

For all we know, if they ever succeed(fail) it may just be dumb fuck luck.  This situation is no different.   

This is the logical and the correct approach. 

It certainly may come off as a trophy wave time - firstly, nothing's happened yet.  Secondly, even these tools wavered E at one time or the other over the last 30 hour's worth of cycles. So they are back?   I can tell you meteorologically why these runs are coming back, without using "blind" model methods - which they are ... until such time as these organization(s) et all put out knowledge-based tell-out educational prospecti about the math and philosophies of these instruments. 

Until that happens, you'll get burned one day, eventually ... if you don't know what it is you are dealing with.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

IF the midlevels get cranking, it's usually near the QPF gradient as a crude rule-of-thumb.

yup...and I think that could end up being pretty damn close to the CT River Valley. The euro really impressed me and for as much as I discounted the AIs its time to take the consistency they've had seriously and factor into the forecast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

All about rates for eastern zones imho….hard to have major ptype issues if 925 is like -3 with good rates. If the rates are crappy, it will be white rain. But as I always say, “if the rates are so crappy you can’t snow in that thermal profile, you weren’t missing out on much anyway.” 
 

 

It's like you can't have it both ways.  More intensity but warmer BL, or less intensity but colder BL?   Weenie sweet spot somewhere between ORH and TAN?  CoastalWx I know is hopeful! LOL.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Well ... for starters, I gave you plenty - and so did others:   no one can (apparently) define the discrete processes in the construct of these tools.   

For all we know, if they ever succeed(fail) it may just be dumb fuck luck.  This situation is no different.   

This is the logical and the correct approach. 

It certainly may come off as a trophy wave time - firstly, nothing's happened yet.  Secondly, even these tools wavered E at one time or the other over the last 30 hour's worth of cycles. So they are back?   I can tell you meteorologically why these runs are coming back, without using "blind" model methods - which they are ... until such time as these organization(s) et all put out knowledge-based tell-out educational prospecti about the math and philosophies of these instruments. 

Until that happens, you'll get burned one day, eventually ... if you don't know what it is you are dealing with.   

A lot of weather is dumb Fuck luck to be honest…random dumb fuck luck actually. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

The profile is marginal so I don't disagree with anything you say here.

I just think the excitement is rooted in the possibility that a last minute trend for a thread the needle event seems to be pointing toward a win for the region. A widespread 3-5" would be the biggest event of the season for many, as sad as that is. More than that? Even better. 

Some areas have already done well,  Already had a 6" event on Cape Cod, and parts of CT and central/western MA has done reasonably well also.  Now, it just the area bounded roughly by BOS-LWM-FIT-PVD-GHG that has been "holed" so far.  CoastalWx is in this "hole!" :fulltilt:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF the latent heat release - trof development feedback loop theory can explain or partly explain the AI vs. physics-based model divide over the past few days, you wouldn't expect a gradually shift towards compromise. You would expect the AIs to hold firm and the physics-based models to shift suddenly and significantly at the last minute.  Only when their initializations start to capture the effect in real time. That would basically be now as Gulf moisture is just now showing up on radar/satellite. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...