Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

January 2024


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just want to make sure I'm following along...up until 48 hours ago, we were excited that a SSWE would occur to lock in a long-term, cold and snowy pattern. Now that the models seem to be backing off that idea it's, "we don't want a SSWE cause they wrecks our snow chances". 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JustinRP37 said:

Sigh the sad thing is even on the ten day there are only a few nights favorable to snow making if the humidity cooperates. Pattern really needs to change in a hurry. 

just get this ugly rain and foggy stuff out of here it makes me sick, I want unbroken sunshine for the next 2 weeks minimum

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JTA66 said:

Just want to make sure I'm following along...up until 48 hours ago, we were excited that a SSWE would occur to lock in a long-term, cold and snowy pattern. Now that the models seem to be backing off that idea it's, "we don't want a SSWE cause they wrecks our snow chances". 

A SSWE represents the start of a pattern change.  It is in no way a guarantee of a long term cold and snowy pattern.  I will describe the issue in a simple manner.  Over the past several winters we have seen the establishment of a very strong west to east jet stream over and across the northern Pacific Ocean.  The significance of this is that it prevents the sustained formation of a ridge over the western states which would deliver cold air down to us from northern Canada.  This said jet stream literally blows away this ridge before it can get established and covers the country in mild Pacific air which is too mild for snow.  This was the issue last winter.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

I'm certainly open to hearing how the models look good. I don't see anything on the horizon thru the 10th of January 

First threat or model run of interest will probably start around the 5/6th. I agree, by the 15th if we are still reading posts from metfan about how the pattern is changing this winter is most likely a punt 

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I mean, there’s no point in getting either dejected or overly hyped right now. Smart move is just wait and see how the next week to ten days evolve, and let’s go from there. We’ll know if we smell another rat by the second week of Jan, but anything before that is premature. 

Of course it’s still possible Jan sucks and Feb doesn’t, but nobody wants to go through all of Jan like this and have to pray for Feb, so that would only work as a pleasant surprise IMO. 

FWIW I’d be surprised if NYC goes all of Jan without something on the ground. I believe it’ll happen, but that’s not the same as suggesting we’re entering a great stretch or anything. But I think the city will see something rolling through Jan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Allsnow said:

First threat or model run of interest will probably start around the 5/6th. I agree, by the 15th if we are still reading posts from metfan about how the pattern is changing this winter is most likely a punt 

The Winter is already a punt. Cruising towards AN temps and BN snow. Questions are: do we get a few snow events or one snow event? Are any of those a blockbuster like 2016?

January opens at a solid +5 for those celebrating the pattern change

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Volcanic Winter said:

Yeah I mean, there’s no point in getting either dejected or overly hyped right now. Smart move is just wait and see how the next week to ten days evolve, and let’s go from there. We’ll know if we smell another rat by the second week of Jan, but anything before that is premature. 

Of course it’s still possible Jan sucks and Feb doesn’t, but nobody wants to go through all of Jan like this and have to pray for Feb, so that would only work as a pleasant surprise IMO. 

FWIW I’d be surprised if NYC goes all of Jan without something on the ground. I believe it’ll happen, but that’s not the same as suggesting we’re entering a great stretch or anything. But I think the city will see something rolling through Jan. 

Snowless back to back Januarys would be tough to pull off

Jan 31 to 34 was the worst stretch with 4 straight <1" at central park

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thoughts today:

 

The lack of source region remains a barrier to significant cold despite h5 improvements.  As such, first 5 days of Jan should average above normal before a transient cooler period 5-7th.  Think the risk is cold air overdone by modeling in extended range and HP rolls forward less intense due to lack of snowcover and Pacific air contributing to that issue.  Locally, we'd need to thread a needle for a significant snow and you only have a couple windows where I see that as possible early January.  As I've said several times now, source is still vitally important.   And we are in an improved h5 pattern with marginal source region through the first 7 days of Jan.  That's not a death sentence for snow, but margin of error is slim. 

 

First period of interest would be Jan 5-7 range as some HP in Canada and a wave in the southern stream moving northward.  I flagged this as a period of potential interest last week and thoughts haven't changed on it.  Old adage is 'WAA waits for no man'  but this is a situation where if you can avoid a coastal bomb you could get an overrunning situation into NE Canadian high pressure if the cards on the table lay out properly.  Several things need to go right, theyre not all 'right' as of today, but that may change.  

 

Big picture, thinking this is a multi step process moving forward whereby the upper level pattern shift will be most notable during the Jan 8-15 window as we scour out some Pac air in North America, TPV retrograde westward (slowly), PNA drops and EPO rises.  That should, in theory, start the process of allowing for some carpet to be laid in the Canadian prairies and upper Midwest later in the month.  It's not brutally cold, but it's a way to begin to scour some of the much above normal temps in time.  It'll be stormy, but mild here I think during that second week of Jan.  Could have some much above normal temp days.

 

Could you see something in that window of transition?  Perhaps, but again need several things to go right and big coastals are a no go for snow here in this window.  I expect polar regions to be less hostile heading into mid-late month, but the Pac still hostile for the bulk of early Jan.

 

That brings us to the MLK weekend whereby you're looking for some of this cooler air to potentially migrate S/E ward as PNA rises and board resets towards more traditional Nino with potentially some blocking.  Maybe.  I think you've got a lot more reasons to be optimistic after MLK than before, with the caveat that you'd hope the Pac jet isn't as hostile as it has been if you're a snow lover.

 

As an aside, I'm not considering any potential Strato interaction on this pattern until perhaps February, if at all.  I just view any potential 'help' there as supportive of blocking and not necessarily supporting a Pac change.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, the_other_guy said:

The Winter is already a punt. Cruising towards AN temps and BN snow. Questions are: do we get a few snow events or one snow event? Are any of those a blockbuster like 2016?

We've already punted past a few pattern-change dates.  Until we actually are in the midst of one, I am a skeptic.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Allsnow said:

First threat or model run of interest will probably start around the 5/6th. I agree, by the 15th if we are still reading posts from metfan about how the pattern is changing this winter is most likely a punt 

The El Nino winters that had turnarounds after a completely snowless November/December didn’t do so until either the tail end, last week of January or the beginning of February. If we get to 1/20 and there isn’t a sustained change imminent with actual legit cold (not -NAO/-AO trapping PAC air with a +EPO and screaming fast PAC jet with split-flow blasting into the west coast) then we can start thinking of a 97-98 type redux

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Tatamy said:

A SSWE represents the start of a pattern change.  It is in no way a guarantee of a long term cold and snowy pattern.  I will describe the issue in a simple manner.  Over the past several winters we have seen the establishment of a very strong west to east jet stream over and across the northern Pacific Ocean.  The significance of this is that it prevents the sustained formation of a ridge over the western states which would deliver cold air down to us from northern Canada.  This said jet stream literally blows away this ridge before it can get established and covers the country in mild Pacific air which is too mild for snow.  This was the issue last winter.  

Yes, the Pac jet has been the issue for the last several winters. I'm not cancelling winter on 12/27, but it seems I've been reading posts about the MJO cycling into better phases, jet retractions and SSW events since Thanksgiving.

Just getting a feeling that in another 6 weeks or so, we'll be reading posts about how the writing was on the wall back around the holidays with all the cold air trapped on the other side of the globe and the wretched NA snow cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

Only a handful called a pattern change around Christmas and most quickly backed off

There have been huge red flags for the last 2 months….the record low snow and ice cover, all the arctic air locked on the other side of the pole in Eurasia and an El Niño with region 3.4 SSTs of over +2C in place since November. There is a load of work that needs to be done in our source region. It’s ugly right now

  • Like 2
  • Weenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

The El Nino winters that had turnarounds after a completely snowless November/December didn’t do so until either the tail end, last week of January or the beginning of February. If we get to 1/20 and there isn’t a sustained change imminent with actual legit cold (not -NAO/-AO trapping PAC air with a +EPO and screaming fast PAC jet with split-flow blasting into the west coast) then we can start thinking of a 97-98 type redux

Right. But then the question becomes how many, how much and for how long.

Snowless Ninos dont usually become prolonged winters

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...