Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,038
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

January 2024


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, gravitylover said:

It was beautiful and sunny. Now it's raining. 

now it's raining here too and the wind is really gusty-- it's windier right now than it was at any point last night!

arctic front coming through?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, steve392 said:

Any rainfall totals posted yet for our area?  

 

And speaking if flowers, I do have violias blooming. 

Are you where they had all that flooding?  So sorry man, I saw pictures and videos out of the area and people were driving around in boats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edit: re. [mention=18064]mannynyc[/mention] post of sim ref a few posts above

Looks good for a squall there tomorrow. Too warm in NYC and LI to accumulate but surface wet bulbs and wet bulb zero heights are low enough for it to probably be snow if it stays coherent as it comes through, which both the HRRR and NAMnest are hinting at.

If this happens, could be some brief fun, with heavy snow and 40-50 mph gusts. These soundings are pretty classic, featuring very deep mixing, very steep low to mid level lapse rates, sufficient moisture, and instability. Could get a quick coating over interior sections. 09e5ca53cd41b670bfe9f97dc1a794b3.jpgb61a022d78557cd35f3c1fab8ec1ae26.jpg





  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

Are you where they had all that flooding?  So sorry man, I saw pictures and videos out of the area and people were driving around in boats.

I live a few towns over and it flooded down the block and is flooding right now with tte high tides on the hackensack river. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

Edit: re. [mention=18064]mannynyc[/mention] post of sim ref a few posts above

Looks good for a squall there tomorrow. Too warm in NYC and LI to accumulate but surface wet bulbs and wet bulb zero heights are low enough for it to probably be snow if it stays coherent as it comes through, which both the HRRR and NAMnest are hinting at.

If this happens, could be some brief fun, with heavy snow and 40-50 mph gusts. These soundings are pretty classic, featuring very deep mixing, very steep low to mid level lapse rates, sufficient moisture, and instability. Could get a quick coating over interior sections. 09e5ca53cd41b670bfe9f97dc1a794b3.jpgb61a022d78557cd35f3c1fab8ec1ae26.jpg




 

If you are north and west of the city tomorrow you will definitely need to look out for some nasty snow squalls.  This will be particularly true in the Poconos over to the Catskills.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rjay said:

Smh

I think the Governor was behind this and given the expected conditions it is probably the correct decision.  It’s always interesting to watch these games played in these conditions however when you have tens of thousands of people going out on the roads to get there this is probably the better call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind, a map or any representation of differences in normals (1981-2010) to (1991-2020) is actually a measure of one-third of the difference between (1981-1990) and (2011-2020) because 1991-2010 are two thirds of both data sets. So if a map shows some location warmed by +1.0, it means 2011-2020 was 3.0 warmer than 1981-1990. 

Under the cold dome here, about -10 F which is probably within a few deg of record low max, about -20 F for overnight lows here. Sky is the same intense blue color that we had during the heat dome in June 2021. Trees are plastered with snow from days ago, and s.o.g. is about 20" in town, 30-40 inches in the nearby ski areas, and 15" down in the Columbia valley. These are near to slighty below average snow depths for our region. Only in January 1950 was there anything colder than what we're seeing across BC now, since 1950, a few other occasions were near equal to today. 

As I posted yesterday, Watson Lake Yukon had -74F on Jan 31, 1947 so their lowest value so far (-57F measured as -49.4 C) is not record-setting but there are only a few other cases of even -60 F, the 1947 spell was an outlier. Alberta and montana are probably closer to their all-time record lows, quite a heat island showing up for Edmonton, the station you're seeing (YEG) is 15-20 miles out of town, in the city it is running about 10F warmer. The Calgary airport readings are somewhat within suburban portions of their eat island, their airport (YYC) is a lot closer to downtown than YEG. Almost any other weather station in Alberta will have no urban effects, but you do get topographical variations in these calm cold spells, as solar radiation in January is negligible, so the overnight cold stays noticeable in valley bottoms all day. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Tatamy said:

Different world here.  The cold front came through around 10:30 AM and it has been in the low 40s since.  

was it warmer and sunny before that?

I was up in the Poconos a few days ago, only about half the snow that fell melted, there was still 6 inches on the ground.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

There were several sun showers and a rainbow in Mamaroneck about an hour ago.

this was unexpected, all the media outlets said there would be nothing after 7 am lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...