Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,511
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Toothache
    Newest Member
    Toothache
    Joined

Currently monitoring guidance for March late 3rd through the 4th for the next ( beyond the 28th) significant event


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, STILL N OF PIKE said:

That’s ahh a clear trend . 
 

850/925 look plenty cold for now for those who stay on N side of system but the trend is not the friend of those in S SNE . 
 

Let’s see if that continues , reverses etc

 

850 looks good, but its 925 down you have to worry about most, I believe. Easterly fetch when primary hangs on, and surface high slides east.

And potentially sneaky warm tongues above 850.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

850 looks good, but its 925 down you have to worry about most, I believe. Easterly fetch when primary hangs on, and surface high slides east.

And potentially sneaky warm tongues above 850.

The high is holding solidly on those maps you posted . Even as the low trends NW ..the high is holding ...I just see a pretty strong  gradient setting up  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Okay, but.. for winter enthusiasts,  I think it's cold enough - serviceable

The anomaly products are less constraining on the outlook for me, when the scalar assessments of the 2-meter ambient temperature, and the 850 thermal layout over the course of the total synoptic awareness/evolution...is deeply cold enough. 

I mean, these synoptic parameters could certainly change in the modeling moving forward... we'll see.

Where? More specifically?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jbenedet said:

This one is going to look familiar in terms of the seasonal persistence gradient. 

I don't think you start to feel comfortable with odds of significant wintry precip until to go from PWM, to DAW, to MA/VT border.

 

image.thumb.gif.63c87c6ebeb332232ddff89a15f6ea6d.gif

Same old same old….trough digging more out west and se ridge trending stronger….this will be a mid west storm 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

I’m sure we’ll start seeing some ticks se but we’re getting in the range now of seeing the system for what it is. 

There's still a large spread on how the NAO is handling the Quebec confluence to the north. I want to see that spread reduce some before getting confident in solutions.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

There's still a large spread on how the NAO is handling the Quebec confluence to the north. I want to see that spread reduce some before getting confident in solutions.

Details TBD for sure but I originally thought we could manage an all snow event from NYC to BOS but that’s increasingly less likely now. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah..that trailing S/W has been looming ... the way it interferes is in question.  It seems it is helping to tip the flow more SW and that carries the 3rd/4th lead more NW... ultimately creating the mangle aggregate clung to IP zr fest.  

I dunno... the orbital view to me hasn't changed. I don't see this getting N of Cleveland really... It's like the GFS has been trying to find ways to squeeze along that axis ever more densely every run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, dryslot said:

I like it this one for at least an MECS with some upside, Just need to keep expectations in check once again, This one looks to be heading into the seasonal trend of de amplification strength wise after some zoinked runs.

Out west to the plains it's trending stronger. 

I think the problem is damage is done on that front, sending the 540 thickness where many are "out of the game". Confluence is there but with background warmth.

 

image.thumb.gif.b02cfc82f2c26e168a58f2ef11e0669b.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

GGEM was really suppressed at 00z, so it's not a surprise it came north to be more in line with other guidance.

yup... we're struggling to find a consensus here - but there is some sense of really getting an event. Heh...gotta start somewhere.  But that's the take away so far...

we'll see where things go.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dryslot said:

I like it this one for at least an MECS with some upside, Just need to keep expectations in check once again, This one looks to be heading into the seasonal trend of de amplification strength wise after some zoinked runs.

1 footish is the ceiling here IMO...its not a HECS. I don't like the attenuation and primary struggles. Not complaining...just how I see it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...