Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Feb 28th-March 1st long duration Miller B threat


George001
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, ariof said:

ofc they spent most of the week selling it as a "historic" storm in the top 10 (to be fair, their top 10 is kind of weak sauce) and then it turns into a foot of snow. Only one poster who started this thread was doing that here. (And to be fair, the models were pushing 12-24 for a while, and it wound up at the lower end of that anyway.

 

Just now, weatherwiz said:

I may be wrong, but I think the 18-24'' was to account for both rounds as they were getting two rounds of heavy snow. One was Monday night into Tuesday and the second Tuesday night into this morning. 

 

 

Screenshot_20230223_145816_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the guidance beefed up a bit from last night, but not as much as the Euro yesterday. That’s a great look, strong consensus for 12-18 inches of snow and it’s very close to being quite a bit more. The NAO is negative and there is a strong low tracking to our SE. If the bust scenario is “only” a foot, that’s how you know we have a monster on our hands.

  • Weenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ariof said:

ofc they spent most of the week selling it as a "historic" storm in the top 10 (to be fair, their top 10 is kind of weak sauce) and then it turns into a foot of snow. Only one poster who started this thread was doing that here. (And to be fair, the models were pushing 12-24 for a while, and it wound up at the lower end of that anyway.

Euro did not only had 12 to 16 in max zone in Minneapolis.  IDK what trap they fell into but it was a great snowstorm anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Disagree have not had a solid day 4 consensus since Dec

We never got a good threat inside d6 in December. Unless you count 12/16 for elevated interior north of the pike. But that excluded about 90% of the posters in SNE. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Positive move from the 12z suite. The main thing I am paying attention to is the 850 mb wind plots to monitor the easterly jet. Here is yesterday's 18z GFS plot which delivered a consensus 18" east of ORH:

image.png.123a528fa22cd43c5d8f432c0afc85f4.png

Now here is the 06z plot that "only" gave east of ORH widespread 10-12" amounts:

image.png.95e60e481d382d8c9f204186ac064000.png

Finally, here is this morning's GFS which returns to delivering a general 14-16" east of ORH.

image.png.72149a90e36f9383fc1720b12970d446.png

FWIW the Euro made a similar improvement.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chris12WX said:

Positive move from the 12z suite. The main thing I am paying attention to is the 850 mb wind plots to monitor the easterly jet. Here is yesterday's 18z GFS plot which delivered a consensus 18" east of ORH:

image.png.123a528fa22cd43c5d8f432c0afc85f4.png

Now here is the 06z plot that "only" gave east of ORH widespread 10-12" amounts:

image.png.95e60e481d382d8c9f204186ac064000.png

Finally, here is this morning's GFS which returns to delivering a general 14-16" east of ORH.

image.png.72149a90e36f9383fc1720b12970d446.png

FWIW the Euro made a similar improvement.

Great posts. Follow the mid levels. Ignore qpf. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...