Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,406
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Jetsfan2023
    Newest Member
    Jetsfan2023
    Joined

March Medium/Long Range Discussion


WinterWxLuvr
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

That's what I posted above. I mean it isnt a fail proof setup, nothing is. But I would take this anywday vs an amped cutter in Pittsburgh at this range.

This is helpful. For mostly ignorant people like me, the lack of digital blue=cave to GFS, even if that's not what's really happening. But if the GFS shows digital blue at 12Z, then I'll immediately become terrified snow won't happen because GFS... even though I'm presently terrified because the GFS is not showing digital blue. 

Scary part? I'm not even really kidding. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, psuhoffman said:

You’re definitely the best on here now at diagnosing this. Wish @showmethesnow would still post his morning briefings. 
 

But to summarize why those details are hard to resolve and could take longer than usual to get to the final solutions, there are too many waves involved in this scenario. And the wave breaking from each impacts both the high latitude configuration and the confluence but also the wave spacing under it.  It’s asking a lot of guidance to be dead on balls accurate with all these waves in close proximity but that’s what’s necessary in order to get the exact right track correct on our potential storm.  I’ve never expected this to be resolved at long leads given the setup. 

Yes it is definitely 'busy' in the NS, and subtle differences in wave timing/interactions are going to potentially make big differences in the outcome. It is almost always the case that the one result we want requires so much to go right with these wave interactions. As you often say, we need some luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

That's what I posted above. I mean it isnt a fail proof setup, nothing is. But I would take this anywday vs an amped cutter in Pittsburgh at this range.

I get what you’re saying and you’re right the Gfs and icon arrive at their solutions in a different way. But there is a common thread. The thermal boundary is too far NW.   That allows the Gfs to amp up and cut and allows the Ivon to get too far NW before getting shunted east.  So although I get the point you’re making I think the pessimism is also warranted because we can see how even with a more suppressed solution we can still fail because the thermals aren’t what we need. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

That's what I posted above. I mean it isnt a fail proof setup, nothing is. But I would take this anywday vs an amped cutter in Pittsburgh at this range.

If I lived in PA or NY I would take it too.  As depicted it’s worse than last two ICON runs for majority here.  You know our luck in the MA with miller B

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

I get what you’re saying and you’re right the Gfs and icon arrive at their solutions in a different way. But there is a common thread. The thermal boundary is too far NW.   That allows the Gfs to amp up and cut and allows the Ivon to get too far NW before getting shunted east.  So although I get the point you’re making I think the pessimism is also warranted because we can see how even with a more suppressed solution we can still fail because the thermals aren’t what we need. 

Agree with ALL of this. Doing my best to keep optimism and morale high while there is still some semblance of a chance. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BristowWx said:

If I lived in PA or NY I would take it too.  As depicted it’s worse than last two ICON runs for majority here.  You know our luck in the MA with miller B

If this goes the way you noted I will start limiting my posts in this sub for obvious reasons...respect being first. But there is still hope for 40S. Don't give up the ship yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stormtracker said:

Well, so far at 120 looks like more of the same.  Hopefully I'm wrong and jumping the gun

Same or not, (imo) it's too mild out ahead of this system.  It would be a cold chasing precip setup...which ain't ideal in early March.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

If this goes the way you noted I will start limiting my posts in this sub for obvious reasons...respect being first. But there is still hope for 40S. Don't give up the ship yet.

Ok but it has nothing to do with you.  I enjoy your posts.  But there are stark differences between your area and mine as you know.  Your enthusiasm is appreciated but just not always relevant to many in these set ups.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, brooklynwx99 said:

we're going to have to find out if the GFS is on crack or not pretty soon. it's just so different from everything else

Yeah, the 12z euro will be very interesting to see. I’ve given up on the idea of an all snow event here, but still holding out some hope for a rain to snow scenario.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Terpeast said:

Yeah, the 12z euro will be very interesting to see. I’ve given up on the idea of an all snow event here, but still holding out some hope for a rain to snow scenario.

I miss the days when we had snow to rain lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...