Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

Very persistent signal for moderate snow and ice impact between "Wed night" and "Thur night" this week


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, dendrite said:

Mesos vs globals right now

Correct. And as some mets have already noted, the synoptic solutions the Nam suite had earlier didn't make sense. The 18z starts what looks to be a trend south. A lot of hand wringing here from folks who look to walk away with a nice little snow storm. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

I should probably learn to look at models, but it seemed to me that people in the thread were talking about slightly further south, and slightly colder solutions, which I assumed would result in more snow up by me north of Concord. It sounds like the midlevel warmth is going further north though. The watch is still in place, but seems that they are leaning advisory.  Gene might be safe but sounds like this is not a big event south of the Lakes region and foothills.  I’m kinda surprised.

Neighbor, looks like one of those storms where I will be in Concord and Jealous of you in Bosc.... :-( 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All we're doing in here it pointing out the very typical oscillations that happen to everything that is ever modeled. 

Step back and look at it from Orbit...this has been solid and relatively unalterable since a day ...day and half ago.  Every storm that is ever modeled, no matter the scale or the intensity, varies just like this - typically... no one notices, because they are safely inside the threat area where such minuscule movement are irrelevant ... thus, unnoticed. 

In other words, it's unlikely to be an indication of this moving en mass N or S from here on out.  These 'giga' motions are going to take place in the guidance output, right through verification.  

You'll know if this wholesale makes a definitive move.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

I should probably learn to look at models, but it seemed to me that people in the thread were talking about slightly further south, and slightly colder solutions, which I assumed would result in more snow up by me north of Concord. It sounds like the midlevel warmth is going further north though. The watch is still in place, but seems that they are leaning advisory.  Gene might be safe but sounds like this is not a big event south of the Lakes region and foothills.  I’m kinda surprised.

Looks like the lake north gets the brunt, not sure where your town is, maybe on the borderline?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

All we're doing in here it pointing out the very typical oscillations that happen to everything that is ever modeled. 

Step back and look at it from Orbit...this has been solid and relatively unalterable since a day ...day and half ago.  Every storm that is ever modeled, no matter the scale or the intensity, varies just like this - typically... no one notices, because they are safely inside the threat area where such minuscule movement are irrelevant ... thus, unnoticed. 

In other words, it's unlikely to be an indication of this moving en mass N or S from here on out.  These 'giga' motions are going to take place in the guidance output, right through verification.  

You'll know if this wholesale makes a definitive move.

Yeah it has trended surprisingly little in the past 2-3 days....guess we'll see if we can get one last colder push for us pike to rt 2 dwellers, but I doubt any major changes are coming. I kind of expect some tiny little ticks north/warmer in the final 24 hours here, but who knows....maybe it will throw us a bone for 6 hours tomorrow evening.

As much as we joke about the model dopamine drip, I do actually like watching snow falling from the sky, so it would be nice to get 6 hours of moderate to heavy snowfall for once this winter. Been an utter dearth of snow lasting more than about 2 hours this season and a vast majority of them were like today....33F grass/car top jobs that start melting immediately after it falls.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anecdotally...and fwiw... I've been tracking GYX forecast amounts to actuals for PWM this year (and last) after (Chris, I think?) mentioned they have an over-forecast bias.

This year they've been remarkably accurate.  They are under-forecasting to the tune of 7.6", half of which came on the 12/16 event.  They have only over-forecast on the 1/25 event (by 2.3")

image.png.92c4ca0347e97080b1a6a9859607c9c7.png

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BOX is unimpressed for snow. 
 

&& .SHORT TERM /6 AM WEDNESDAY MORNING THROUGH THURSDAY/... Our active and progressive weather pattern continues during this period as we see a ridge of high pressure briefly bring a quiet and dry period of weather for Wednesday before another winter weather system arrives Wednesday night. This storm starts as a low pressure over the Midwest Wednesday afternoon before it moves into NY/PA Wednesday night, generating a secondary low along the frontal boundary off the mid Atlantic coast overnight into Thursday. Precipitation arrives in western MA and CT after sunset Wednesday associated with the warm frontextending from the parent low. Given this timing we`re not expecting an impact to the Wednesday evening commute. Temperatures through the column may be initially cold enough for this to start off as snow for some, though there remains much uncertainty as to the timing/details of this dynamic mixed precipitation event. There is high confidence in a stout warm nose around 800 mb which will produce sleet and freezing rain, eventually changing to rain. The low confidence comes with how quickly that warm nose moves in. The faster guidance would allow very little time for any snow, while the slower global guidance keeps precipitation as snow for several hours before flipping over. We are just getting into the window of the higher resolution guidance, and for now we`ll stick with a blend of the two solutions, with some minimal snowfall accumulations at the onset, northwest of the I-95 corridor, then flipping to sleet and freezing rain. Best shot at a few inches of snow will be for northern MA. Of greater concern for travel interests during Thursday morning`s commute will be the icy precipitation (sleet/freezing rain). For areas south and east of I- 95 a mostly rain solution is favored. Eventually the dry slot moves overhead Thursday morning bringing an end to precipitation by afternoon. After widespread highs in the 40s on Wednesday we`ll be cooler for most on Thursday. Given the path of the low, it will direct cold north/northeasterly flow into southern New England as it passes on Thursday so the warmest part of the day will be early, with colder air funneling in during the afternoon. Highs will be coldest in northern MA and warmest along the south coast. &&

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tunafish said:

Anecdotally...and fwiw... I've been tracking GYX forecast amounts to actuals for PWM this year (and last) after (Chris, I think?) mentioned they have an over-forecast bias.

This year they've been remarkably accurate.  They are under-forecasting to the tune of 7.6", half of which came on the 12/16 event.  They have only over-forecast on the 1/25 event (by 2.3")

image.png.92c4ca0347e97080b1a6a9859607c9c7.png

real good team up thar

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I don’t see more than 1-2” at NH/ border , not a big difference than what you have but just saying what I think 

another 32-33 F system , at least some of them have been snow compared to pike south folks 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

This from BTV seems reasonable.  I think 6-10” or 7-11” is a good guess for most spots in their area.

Snowfall totals are in the 7-11 inch
range with potentially 11-15 inches on mountaintops.

You guys just have so much More wiggle room to snow In the -PNA this year . Latitude has been king . The more the better 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, STILL N OF PIKE said:

Will what seems to be driving the little shifts ...i know you said there were multiple factors competing ..do models lock in on some of these better at 36 hours out 

I’ve noticed the PV has been extending/elongating just a hair SE on these colder runs lowering the heights in NE. I’m not entirely sure on the reason we are seeing those little wobbles.  Might be how it’s interacting with today’s shortwave.
 

I think Tip’s overall larger view has been very correct on this one…that PV is a monster and isn’t going to move very easily so it’s that versus the western trough and the forces are pretty equal at the moment. But since your area in the NH border region down to mine near the pike is right on the line, we’re sweating these 15 mile wobbles whereas nobody in NYC gives a crap and powderfreak doesn’t give a crap either…it’s mostly been the same solutions for them outside the “marginal zone” where we are. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...