Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

The Valentine's Day Massacre Obs--A snow job or does it only blow?


moneypitmike

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yeah. The euro is best at H5 and for identifying threats in that d4-5 range, but my god has it struggled with cyclogenesis this winter. Maybe it's a clipper/miller B issue or it too is just too hires for its own good.

I think it is related to resolution. These systems aren't the typical consolidated low bombing they've had split centers for a short time during maturation. Euro Keyed on the spin that ran over eastern ma and tucked that over your heads and went to town. Reality is that was eventually going to get pulled back down into the consolidating low which it did.

Gfs keyed too much on the left low so they both stunk for the same reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like the Scott (messenger hate is pretty strong this a.m.). I went back many pages to see any of his comments, but looks like they're all deleted, so all I get is half of a conversation. Many folks get emotional over this stuff (see Jebman in mid-Atlantic), but I suppose if there were personal attacks, the delete button must be used.

Anyway, looking forward to seeing some sweet pics from around the region.

lol at Cantore too.

I didn't delete anything. My strongest comments were that the Gfs was awful and totally wrong. Is that even up for debate at this point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BOS officially came in at 16.2"....up to 95.7" now on the season. Leon (96.3") is finished being only 0.7" ahead. Probably only retains the #2 spot for another 48 hours or so.

 

 

BOS for the month of February is at 58.5"....60"+ for the month is a foregone conclusion as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nailing events is one thing. But he came across like the science was settled. That's not science. That's pedantic scientism. And that's what a lot take issue with.

wtf are you talking about? The biggest dispute was over the Gfs. How'd that 1.25" qpf work out for northwest Areas and way higher than .5 way west and north etc.

I said eastern areas excluding northeast Ma looked good for .4 to .7 or .8 , I don't believe I ever ONCE discussed specifically totals for any other area than my own where I figured 4-8 or 5-10 and a NOAA employee reported a final of 10.5.

Yeah I blew it on the blizzard by new standards. There were no massive power outages, no hurricane gusts anywhere or even close, limited to no structural damage. These were all things being touted all over the media and even by the NWS. Even the most enthusiastic on snow totals butchered the predictions on wind and devastation associated with it.

We got two high ratio bands of snow. I don't think the water equivalent reports will show widespread 1.5 or abything crazy like that. It'll probably be mostly .3 to about .9 west to east with Harvey reporting some 30-1 ratios.

But show me where I have a forecast for your area or anyone else's? My biggest stake in the ground was that the wettest Gfs runs were horrible with regards to how far west and north they got because it spun up a spurious feature which it finally dropped at 0z last night. Sorry if you misunderstood. I'll refund your money....oh wait this is for fun...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BOS officially came in at 16.2"....up to 95.7" now on the season. Leon (96.3") is finished being only 0.7" ahead. Probably only retains the #2 spot for another 48 hours or so.

 

 

BOS for the month of February is at 58.5"....60"+ for the month is a foregone conclusion as well.

Will, where's Worcester at right now after this storm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is related to resolution. These systems aren't the typical consolidated low bombing they've had split centers for a short time during maturation. Euro Keyed on the spin that ran over eastern ma and tucked that over your heads and went to town. Reality is that was eventually going to get pulled back down into the consolidating low which it did.

Gfs keyed too much on the left low so they both stunk for the same reason.

Tippy kept bringing up the NAVGEM yesterday. Others have said the GGEM did alright. I'll admit I only gave them a cursory glance. Maybe there's something to be said about higher res not equating to a better forecast. A lot of those non-hydrostatic 4km models go nuts with banding and convection. It seems like they overdo the mesoscale phenomena too much which adversely affects the synoptic scale. Maybe there's a happy medium resolution out there that gives more focus on the synoptic and basic hydrostatic/quasi geostrophic thinking, yet still shows a hint of mesoscale features without running wild with them. I'm not a modeling expert though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BOS officially came in at 16.2"....up to 95.7" now on the season. Leon (96.3") is finished being only 0.7" ahead. Probably only retains the #2 spot for another 48 hours or so.

 

 

BOS for the month of February is at 58.5"....60"+ for the month is a foregone conclusion as well.

 

Nothing's a guarantee until it's fallen and measured.

 

If we get 2" from the glancing blow in a couple days, then yeah, you're right. But it could just as easily be 0.5" or less... we won't know until we know.

 

Leon is on the ropes now, that's for sure. And the king -- '95-'96 -- is doable. Ironic that this seems doable in a year where on January 20th, the 8" or so needed to break the all time record at BOS would've been a nice season-salvaging storm just to get on the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not much we can do Mike, Not like i can make it snow, It snows where it wants to, No one is going to feel bad as i am at 97.70" for the season.........lol

 

Man, you're 30" ahead of me.  I'm hoping we get at least one system that rips western New England.  It will probably come at the end of March after I've switched into spring-mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was Messenger's tone more than his actual forecast, IMO, that turned people the wrong way.

But yes, time to lay off. He's been a great asset many times.

DSnow the tone doesn't matter. I have tried it all sorts of different ways over the years. If I was less determined in what I said I'd be no different than many other that are non committal and obtuse. I'd also later be accused of being wishy washy.

I was adamant the Gfs was totally wrong on those wet runs. It did cave and we didn't see anywhere near what it predicted N&W. I never said squat about anyone else's snow totals go back and look in SNE.

Not once. At all. I did throw out liquid equivalents and I don't think they'll be terrible given ratios the TV people are reporting. I didn't get it right but by chance did you see NOAA change their forecasts 4 times in 4 hours this am?

I ended up right in the WE range I thought here. That band to my west probably pumped out close to .9 or 1. I'd love to see miltons WE.

Whatever on the blizzard criteria, blew that. But this wasn't the house and electric grid smashing tempest many were proclaiming. Nice major winter storm, more snow than thought but I'll go to the mat in saying the Gfs was dead wrong on those runs which ironically were among the few maps I posted the entire storm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I submitted 11.0" as my final to BOX. Someone else in town has been submitting as well and we match up

Wonder who?

I took a bunch of depths. Range was 24" to 34". Avg around 29"

Not bad but have done better. This stuff compacts

Not bad I got 12" up on the backside of Wachusett. Took some total OTG measurements as well of course with my snowshoes on. AVG about 32" some 40" spots some 32" amazing out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...