Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,657
    Total Members
    25,819
    Most Online
    Donut Hole
    Newest Member
    Donut Hole
    Joined

May 2026 Obs/Discussion


weatherwiz
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, dendrite said:

3 brutal days here…W Th F. Mostly 40s/low 50s and rain. I don’t think we’ll warm sector this evening.

 

2 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

43F and rain here in town… 40F at 1500ft.  32F at 3600ft.

Brutal.

GWDLT. 

Sun just popped out here. Should be a good afternoon before whatever rain we get arrives late this evening.  Up to 63 now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, metagraphica said:

 

GWDLT. 

Sun just popped out here. Should be a good afternoon before whatever rain we get arrives late this evening.  Up to 63 now.

We still need all of the rain we can get so no complaints…yet. It’s not like we’re missing out on 80° and sun…just have to keep the shades closed for 72hrs.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dendrite said:

3 brutal days here…W Th F. Mostly 40s/low 50s and rain. I don’t think we’ll warm sector this evening.

If we have to endure 3 awful May days, I wish it would RAIN - the 20 months 9/24 thru 4/26 have racked up a deficit of 21.2".  Not mid-1960s but troubling.  Last week's 3-day soaking rain dropped a modest 0.62"; 2" would be nice.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SouthCoastMA said:

Looks more like temporary mild downs into the 60's/70s at times in the longer range - but it seems like the cold regime is pretty much wiped out after Friday

We're moving into a regime where average temperatures and at times quite above average will win out. Any periods of below average will be the product of fronts moving through...this could net 3-4 days of below average temps because it may take a bit to rebuild the greater warmth but the cycle we've been in is coming to an end.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, WxWatcher007 said:

 

X post is hype for attention.  And bandwagon/sample size logical fallacies -- "nobody I have connected with in the community wants this to happen."  So this person's connections are all encompassing and represent the *entire* wx community?  That's pretty narrow-minded and arrogant.  And who exactly is saying they don't like the RRFS?  Vague proclamations are a red flag.

This reminded me of last year when the DoD was going to stop the data dissemination of the 3 legacy DMSP polar orbiter satellite, and the TC community was up in arms b/c of the loss of the microwave data, acting like this would cripple TC forecasting.  Well, there are other satellite like this other countires have we have access to, and the DoD had already launched the first in a set of replacement satellites for this legacy batch.

More and more, ppl post stuff for mere engagement bait, looking for the 15 microseconds of fame.

And the flip side, as if 12km NAM is great?  It hasn't been tweaked in 10+ years and is often useless after 36 hr.  The 3km NAM issues w/ it overdoing its QPF, esp. orographics, do we need that still?  Ppl who don't understand models use this 3 km NAM flaw and run w/ it as if 50" snowfalls in SNE will happen!  Getting rid of NAM and it derivatives is a good thing.

These days ppl will latch onto any change and act like it is end of days.  They prey on the human basic instinct to fear change.  Not all change is bad by default, and sometimes you have to move on for things to advance.

Yes, the RRFS has its share of issues (SPC noted it has problems w/ the BL for convection), but what model does not have it share of issues?  And as we get higher and higher resolution for models and try to directly simulate directly atmospheric process, rather than emulate, the challenge here is not linear.

RRFS been in test and evaluation mode for some time, and available for all to see, so it not just like cold turkey,  The HRRR will be run in tandem likely for some time (look at how long the NAM has stuck around).  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John is a long time poster here. "Rufus" seemed pretty bad in some of the winter events this season. We posted it frequently and it seemed to be on its own island (not the correct one either).

But we'll see how it goes. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, weatherwiz said:

Part of the degrading in forecasting too is all of these stupid products that exist.

Model snowfall maps, Freezing Rain Accumulation maps, Supercell Composite Parameter, Significant Tornado Parameter, the stupid hazard type at the bottom right of the SHARPpy forecast soundings, maybe throw updraft helicity swaths in here too

More is not always better. Too many models as it is, so this is good "cleaning house." 

They were supposed to stop the HWRF and HMON before last hurricane season, but haven't.  HAFS has proven itself big time, so just move on.  As I have said, having too many models that have less skill overall hang around just allows hype-masters to find the ONE model that shows "what they want to see," and run w/ that.
 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...