Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,617
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

“Cory’s in NYC! Let’s HECS!” Feb. 22-24 Disco


TheSnowman
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

 

 

 

Love it and these are my boys. 

It was headed that way and it still found a way to curl in…we’ll see. We’re trending nw but would anyone honestly be surprised if the gfs makes the SE tick for a model compromise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I was just going on what I was told.....

I know just having fun. I think more than a Messenger shuffle we as Tipper suggest tick NW and as you suggest no LBSW. I wish I lived on the EM coast for this one.  Gusts to 70

I still have JUNO vibes 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feels like we’re maxing west trends currently. I’d fully expect a jog east.

i think the Jan 22 references are legit. This obviously isn’t as potent of a system. However, that slowly faded SE over the last couple days.

It was obviously an all time event here because we got in the deformation band, but that was originally modeled way west.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

AVvXsEiVllyk-Dd6wzgj-EK2m7SnTfIUfxCOmEiLEFeb62vldZ-CWIONyZ0YRNqPDsLXoAUSMKIuZImrBsY76RNu2mDkHdyaWxibYqiM6p0FJBt30CtYswClN4mMwYOkqmYSYq0ROcxkp7558qGcKPdx_e1FYf-FtlEu5Iqq4Kh-Gtzsairckv0ByCSHMWbsZ1Y=w640-h256

I am not so sure I would classify this as a tick southeast. Obviously, looking at this face value that's the take, HOWEVER, that is also tied into where the GFS believes the brunt of the CCB will traverse and impact. So in this regard, the QPF isn't necessarily reflective of trends in storm track but trends in CCB (which we know models don't do great with until ~24hr or just inside). BUT...this does provide a very good proxy of what you can probably expect for max QPF 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

I am not so sure I would classify this as a tick southeast. Obviously, looking at this face value that's the take, HOWEVER, that is also tied into where the GFS believes the brunt of the CCB will traverse and impact. So in this regard, the QPF isn't necessarily reflective of trends in storm track but trends in CCB (which we know models don't do great with until ~24hr or just inside). BUT...this does provide a very good proxy of what you can probably expect for max QPF 

Digging in....I see what some are saying, it is a hair N with the SLP....QPF distribution discrepancy is probably noise.

GEFS will likely be better.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CT Valley Snowman said:

GFS with the CTRV qpf shadow.  Hopefully it's getting a bit too cute with the topography.  I know it's too early to fret about such things, it's just always in the back of my mind.  

I saw that earlier but didn't want to say anything.. I know all to well about that.. it still gives me nightmares thinking about how much that use to suck lol

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CT Valley Snowman said:

GFS with the CTRV qpf shadow.  Hopefully it's getting a bit too cute with the topography.  I know it's too early to fret about such things, it's just always in the back of my mind.  

If we get a deep layer easterly fetch, that will happen....and east slopes of ORH will rival se MA for JP...especially with CJ capability reduced given decreased SST/land lapse.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, dendrite said:

It was headed that way and it still found a way to curl in…we’ll see. We’re trending nw but would anyone honestly be surprised if the gfs makes the SE tick for a model compromise?

No would t be surprising but seems this might be headed nw.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CT Valley Snowman said:

GFS with the CTRV qpf shadow.  Hopefully it's getting a bit too cute with the topography.  I know it's too early to fret about such things, it's just always in the back of my mind.  

6-8 would still be pretty good considering what's not happening today and didn't happen Wednesday.

 

No one wants to see a deform band of 2-4/hr goodies parked overhead with awesome snow growth more than we do. We just have to pray. I'm sick of these messenger shuffles!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...