Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,603
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

Late February/Early March 2026 Mid-Long Range


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

Honestly, the euro has been windshield wipering between no storm and storm. I don’t care about run to run shifts on op models at this lead time. Ensembles only until 84-96 hours

This is probably the more rational approach. I recall someone saying we’d probably be happier not having access to op runs beyond day 5 lol.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

EPS mean stronger vort than previous run. Too soon to tell for qpf, mslp, but I don’t think its a giant step back. 

I mean if stronger would think its better but let’s see 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nomz said:

Why is the max file size so low on this thread? I can't even copy and paste frames from PW anymore.

If you have a ton of previous attachments that you've done then it starts to limit your attachment file size.  You have to go into your account settings and delete old attachments and it will increase your attachment size limits.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:

Slight step back here. More notable further north where they lost a few inches. Wonder if some more dynamic solutions were kicked out. Still waiting on individual members/medians.

1771826400-pvW9QJuMbOM.png

I did notice that although the vort was stronger on the mean, it was broader and the tilt wasn't quite as negative (to my eyes). Starting to wonder if it's an increase in dispersiveness among the ensembles before they "reset" (converge) towards a likelier outcome (this typically happens at 4-6 day lead times, where AI ensembles have the opposite problem - under dispersiveness).

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Terpeast said:

I did notice that although the vort was stronger on the mean, it was broader and the tilt wasn't quite as negative (to my eyes). Starting to wonder if it's an increase in dispersiveness among the ensembles before they "reset" towards a likelier outcome (this typically happens at 4-6 day lead times, where AI ensembles have the opposite problem - under dispersiveness).

 

Speak of the AIFS ens devil

1771891200-VzudNOFYjGM.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:

Speak of the AIFS ens devil

1771891200-VzudNOFYjGM.png

Yeah, it doubled down. But remember it's not as dispersive as it should be at this range. The only reason we're giving it credibility is that its 500mb verification scores are excellent.

  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Euro sucks.  Worse than 6z.  Progressive POS

Comparing to 6z is what I mean.  There's some light shit, but it's def a step back.  Sorry yall

At 7 am, I said that the old timey Euro can't find the storm.  It's still looking.

This is very early at nearly 5 days out.  It might still find it.

  • saywhat? 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthArlington101 said:

Just realized the GEFS also sucks. Starting wonder what we're doing here. 

Euro on its on of course its members going to follow to an extent. All the other models are fine. Still days out. Just keep tracking and see where it goes. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stormy said:

At 7 am, I said that the old timey Euro can't find the storm.  It's still looking.

This is very early at nearly 5 days out.  It might still find it.

Or everything else is "finding" a storm that isn't there… We shall see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euro is not always right as we found out plenty of times. If it had some support from like anything I’d be more worried but attm it and it’s ens to an extent are by itself, it’s AI partner not even on board with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

FWIW the evening before the Feb 9 2010 storm the Euro was showing about .65 qpf total for me.  I got 32" of snow.  

I remember that. Was up in Lancaster for that event and the Euro blew chunks on that storm. The 00z Euro on 2/9/10 only had us around 0.5" QPF (I was the lead forecaster for campus weather service that night). Everyone rightfully saw that as a red flag for the event, but the UKMET, GFS, Canadian, and NAM were all in lock step. We ended up with 18" - 22" in Lancaster from that. The night before, the NWS had us at 6" - 12".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...