Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,669
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

Possible coastal storm centered on Feb 1 2026.


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

 

That map you showed Steve did not inspire confidence lol

8d44e7_6886e7b627da44d4a038a4b95f17a53c~
 

I'm fine with Miller A. They’re preferable to me because they’re simple. I was agreeing with not wanting occlusion too soon, which is a risk here. More than OTS imo.

That was the virga storm here..snowed for hrs and hrs aloft here, but never reached the ground. Lost a ton of precip to dry air inland here. Southeast CT crushed it cuz they saturated super quick and snowed to beat the band. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, cleetussnow said:

Out west looks similar - but the trough is positive tilt this time out - I posted approx the same time frames on the current 06z GFS 500 and the verified '96 500 vort.  

96 had good ridging out ahead of it. Here we have a PV lobe dropping south of us suppressing the flow and the vort digs and amplifies last minute over the Carolinas. It tries late to pump some ridging back our way, but there’s less wiggle room for pulling something off.

But we’re still at the point where we can see significant changes at H5 that could drastically change the outcome so everything is still on the table. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ICON is not a dependable model even at this range, from my own experience.

That said ... the 12z rendition of the wholesale evolution (operational) was in fact a marked improvement over the 00z. 

I don't pay enough attention to the off hour runs of this model - need more background on how it works/data feeds/initialization ...everything, which is not something I've been inclined to research given to the unstable performance I've noticed at anything beyond 60 or hours.  But as as far as the former, there's time and space for trending.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kitz Craver said:

Even the west leaning members on ICON ENS wouldn’t get it done. I’m starting to waver on this threat. 

Nah, these west 'leaning' members in this depiction would rage from D.C. to BOS

image.png.6b4a5afabca8c5879deb63d3500167d9.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kitz Craver said:

Even the west leaning members on ICON ENS wouldn’t get it done. I’m starting to waver on this threat. 

Yeah, you’ll want to see significant trends from multiple models by tomorrow night to instill any confidence of this being favorable for much of SNE.

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I am. Not worried about OTS at all.

I don’t think a miss is an option either. Just don’t see the classic pattern for us to get the belly of the beast . I felt much better about this past Storm delivering. It’s gonna snow Sunday/ Monday for sure . Things still evolving absolutely 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

people don't see a very obvious and direct hit, they get emotionally downtrodden, then ... interpret the models according to that emotive response.

check.

This is true, I also think, believe it or not, there is some snow fatigue and people are hedging emotionally at the thought of another blockbuster and dealing with it. For the record I’m not in that camp. I want a dystopian, ozone sniffer. 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, dendrite said:

96 had good ridging out ahead of it. Here we have a PV lobe dropping south of us suppressing the flow and the vort digs and amplifies last minute over the Carolinas. It tries late to pump some ridging back our way, but there’s less wiggle room for pulling something off.

But we’re still at the point where we can see significant changes at H5 that could drastically change the outcome so everything is still on the table. 

For us amateurs, I think posting what the 'perfect' scenario is against the current setup really helps illustrate what it takes from here.  I'm looking for Jan 4 2018 as a possible analog

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I'm not crazy about how far to the south it digs as presently depicted.

Could be better 

 

But..


I’m seeing the risk is much greater that it moves north from that depiction, given the current forecast progression of MJO and -NAO. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...