Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,635
    Total Members
    25,819
    Most Online
    Donut Hole
    Newest Member
    Donut Hole
    Joined

January 24-26: Miracle or Mirage Thread 2


mappy
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

It's just slightly warmer but it's just not going the route the other models show

I'm not unhappy at this run verbatim, but I'm gonna take the pessimistic route and say that the confluence was ever so lessened on this run and it was reflected in the more prominent warm nose at 700 late on Sunday...and that 6z is going to take another step and be the obvious cave.

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TSSN+ said:

Love the run cause it crushes me, but it moves to the warmer models. Primary was stronger that run, coastal was shoved more into the coast. Also only model that flips back to snow after mix. 

I mean, I'm as skeptical as everyone else that this will verify, but you're reaching some here, I think. These are mostly noise level differences.

  • Disagree 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TSSN+ said:

Love the run cause it crushes me, but it moves to the warmer models. Primary was stronger that run, coastal was shoved more into the coast. Also only model that flips back to snow after mix. 

Yeah it looks like it's amping a bit more. I don't know if this depiction survives even another small nudge like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TowsonWeather said:

I mean, I'm as skeptical as everyone else that this will verify, but you're reaching some here, I think. These are mostly noise level differences.

Yeah I mean I guess if we see those features strengthen/weaken again at 6z then perhaps it is a trend. But hard to tell that right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's subtle, the GFS did cave a bit back to the west at 850mb looking at the isohypses. Not as far as other global guidance (Euro, UKMET, CMC, etc.) It's still very aggressive on it's coastal development along the warm front. More so than other models, which in turn slows down the WF advance northward.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wxmeddler said:

It's subtle, the GFS did cave a bit back to the west at 850mb looking at the isohypses. Not as far as other global guidance (Euro, UKMET, CMC, etc.) It's still very aggressive on it's coastal development along the warm front. More so than other models, which in turn slows down the WF advance northward.

So safe to say if we a similar cave at 6z then it's on it's way, lol Goodness gracious this model

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, baltosquid said:

Yeah it looks like it's amping a bit more. I don't know if this depiction survives even another small nudge like that.

agree that GFS is starting its gradual cave towards Euro.  To me it appears to have lost a couple  inches of snow for most/many from the 18Z run.  I expect it will shave a couple inches off each run and meet the Euro fairly closely at game time.  For me in Towson, I am expecting 5-10 inches of snow turning to sleet. then a light freezing rain to top it off.  It will still be cold, white, and beautiful!  Just not as deep!  But should be fun walking on top of it this week.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idk if the GFS really held serve.  While it's still putting down good snows for many, the trend is undeniably moving the bigger snows further to the NW with each of the last 4 runs.  

If this keeps up, it'll be squarely in the camp of the other models calling for a lot of QPF, but more like 5-10" of snow for the big cities, followed by a lot of sleet.

 

 

 

snowtrendgfs.gif

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

Yeah I mean I guess if we see those features strengthen/weaken again at 6z then perhaps it is a trend. But hard to tell that right now

I guess I'm a big dummy because I'm just not seeing any noteworthy evidence of a cave here. 

And let me be clear: I FULLY expect the GFS to cave some or all of the way to a Euro-like solution at some point. I'm just saying that, to my eye anyway, the differences folks are pointing to are so small and synoptically inconsequential as to be well within the normal run-to-run variability. It's actually remarkably consistent with the 18Z run. Again, to my eye. I fully acknowledge I could be missing something big. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...