Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,443
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Snowman92
    Newest Member
    Snowman92
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Ji said:

They broke the GFS something bad. Used to give us fantasy snowstorms all the time.

So you would rather have a model that teased every single run post 200 hrs rather than a piece of guidance that 'should' be more accurate, at least in theory? 

I bet you were a huge fan of the DGEX too?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JFC that 0z GFS had lots of chances but nothing worked out. The end of the GFS looked good as well. Nice pattern we're starting to enter

Legit upper air pattern incoming and a bunch of chances to track. That’s really all we should be taking from models this far out. Specifics of a given threat is pointless at this range. If models hold this look for the next week, we have reason to get excited.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Blizzard of 93 said:

Yes indeed, here is the 0z EPS look for the day 10 to 15 period.

IMG_1305.png

That looks great! But the issue I always have with the 5 day mean is how did it get to that mean as in what happened over the 5 day period to get all the players in the right spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...