Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,419
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    TheWhiteStuff
    Newest Member
    TheWhiteStuff
    Joined

December 2025 regional war/obs/disco thread


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, brooklynwx99 said:

these are also means that we're looking at... it wouldn't be shocking that there's some washing out ongoing

for example. members that don't develop a strong -NAO are likely complete torches with very high E US heights. however, ones that do, and especially the ones that shift the block more west, might actually just have a cold airmass in the east. wish there was a way to look at EPS members like that

I wouldn't be shocked if that ridging in the south is too smoothed out too. I would wager probably more of a ridge axis into the upper Mississippi Valley which could then argue for some lower heights in the Northeast The overall structure of that trough across western Canada's coast will be a big player too 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

I could see a marginal get thrown up for far eastern CT/RI/SE MA. the NAM would certainly argue it but sometimes the NAM gets a little overzealous with elevated in stability in these setups. NAM does have a pocket of steeper mid-level lapse rates (and greater CAPE) but I think its overdone in that regard. The key for eastern areas will be little to no shower activity ahead of the main area

mm  I'm thinking more along the lines of synoptic forcing/wind problems that are then entangled with convection along what's inevitably going to be a ribbon echo squall sinuously side winding across the area. I guess wind watch headlines may cover this come to think of it.

Plus... any "subtle" discrete nature to leading convective elements that are embedded in the misty wind smearing rad wash region - dirty warm sector...  Those'll be whisking along within a llv jet.  Those could snap troubled limbs.  NAM is a tad more aggressive with this llv wind max than the Euro ( 12z ) ...haven't looked that GFS.  But the NAM indicated 65+kts at 925 mb between HFD-BED!     That's a whopper if it's for real.  But even the Euro has this wind maxim moving NYC to SE zones/clipping at 55 to 60.   A compromise puts a potential momentum/gust problem across the bulk of the area.  There's still still 2 days to tune this potential.  But the soundings start to look more barotropic as this is all occurring and that means we scale back the protective inversion stuff...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

mm  I'm thinking more along the lines of synoptic forcing/wind problems that are then entangled with convection along what's inevitably going to be a ribbon echo squall sinuously side winding across the area. I guess wind watch headlines may cover this come to think of it.

Plus... any "subtle" discrete nature to leading convective elements that are embedded in the misty wind smearing rad wash region - dirty warm sector...  Those'll be whisking along within a llv jet.  Those could snap troubled limbs.  NAM is a tad more aggressive with this llv wind max than the Euro ( 12z ) ...haven't looked that GFS.  But the NAM indicated 65+kts at 925 mb between HFD-BED!     That's a whopper if it's for real.  But even the Euro has this wind maxim moving NYC to SE zones/clipping at 55 to 60.   A compromise puts a potential momentum/gust problem across the bulk of the area.  There's still still 2 days to tune this potential.  But the soundings start to look more barotropic as this is all occurring and that means we scale back the protective inversion stuff...  

NAM/GFS do have an insane LLJ at 925 materialize across eastern CT/RI/E MA through Friday morning...so something to definitely keep an eye on if that can be tapped into. This does happen to coincide with the leading edge of the main rain area too, however, there is a stout inversion too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

NAM/GFS do have an insane LLJ at 925 materialize across eastern CT/RI/E MA through Friday morning...so something to definitely keep an eye on if that can be tapped into. This does happen to coincide with the leading edge of the main rain area too, however, there is a stout inversion too

synoptic wind driven events seldom materialize or verify as advertised.   That's why I lean needing the convective assist - hence the Marginal. 

I just checked btw and they've already gone there in their d-3 sev storms outlook - tho the verbiage is rather bland.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

synoptic wind driven events seldom materialize or verify rather to advertised.   That's way I lean needing the convective assist - hence the Marginal. 

I just checked btw and they've already gone there in their d-3 sev storms outlook - tho the verbiage is rather bland.  

 

yeah and they seem to target coastal VA/NC. 

Should be getting a new D3 update though within the next 5-15 minutes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

No, I agree a low first half of a season correlates with a low season in general...what I am saying is that a very low December is a much more dire signal in a cool ENSO season than in a warm ENSO.

One site, only 27 winters, percentage of total winter snow:
             n    Oct-Dec   Oct-Jan
El Nino (8)    24%         51%
La Nina (7)   25%         48%
La Nada (12) 37%        59%

SSS, but the outlier seems obvious.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CoastalWx said:

Honestly, are there any analogs that have that look? I can’t recall that. It reminds me of those stagnant farts that just stays in the room and doesn’t disperse. Just persistent ass.

It’s an unstable longwave pattern so these types don’t last very long. The closest analogs are mostly El Niño years. Early Jan 1952, late Dec 1957 and Dec 1965. Hopefully those roll over the same way because those years had some great patterns a few weeks later. :lol:
 

But I kind of agree with @brooklynwx99, it’s not going to verify exactly as depicted for 10-14 days on end. It’s prob going to trend toward something a bit more stable. Hopefully that means on the snowier side for us and not the furnace side. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...