Will - Rutgers Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Just now, LibertyBell said: ok isnt that just what it usually looks like 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 4 minutes ago, JetsPens87 said: It's only a 6 percent chance that am earthquake is followed by a larger one I feel like there was an aftershock stronger the original quake a few years ago in California.... just going by my memory, of course such a thing would have a higher chance of happening there. This was a 4.0 following a 4.8 which itself had only a 10% of happening. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Just now, Will - Rutgers said: ok isnt that just what it usually looks like Yeah this registers a 0.8 on the Long Island Traffic Index Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 20 minutes ago, ag3 said: End of times. The Best of times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forkyfork Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 more plz 5 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCG RS Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 9 minutes ago, JetsPens87 said: Not to say it couldn't or never happens but USGS does say it is exceedingly rare. My apologies here, I did not mean to ignite a firestorm. I was trying to say it comfortingly.. but.... alas, I missed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCG RS Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 7 minutes ago, LibertyBell said: Yeah this registers a 0.8 on the Long Island Traffic Index Listen - I saw that movie and was like.. Hmm. Then Baltimore happened. Just saying 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 4 minutes ago, forkyfork said: more plz Earthquake > Eclipse ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 1 minute ago, USCG RS said: Listen - I saw that movie and was like.. Hmm. Then Baltimore happened. Just saying Baltimore reminded me of The Mothman Prophecies. That was based around another bridge collapse and the happenings around that time were creepy to say the least. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCG RS Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Just now, LibertyBell said: Baltimore reminded me of The Mothman Prophecies. That was based around another bridge collapse and the happenings around that time were creepy to say the least. Yeah... that movie haunted my childhood. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cfa Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Anyone else notice a gust of wind (pressure related?) with the arrival of the quake? I’ve heard this from multiple people in both NY and NJ. The glass door of the building I was in blew open and the roof made the loudest creakiest noise, like it wanted to collapse. I thought a helicopter or small plane struck the roof or something else nearby (I was near ISP). During the 2011 earthquake I lived in Queens, multiple stories in the air, my bed was bouncing and the building started swaying in a way that was uncomfortable. One wall developed cracks. Another quake in 2016, in the Rockaways, with an epicenter about 30-40 miles offshore. It was less than a 3.0 but I felt it and saw things moving. Much weaker than 2011 or today though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 28 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said: Updated list of 4.0 Earthquakes, assuming the current 4.0 rating holds. Today would be the first date on which there were two such earthquakes in the NYC area. Didn't dream of you having to put together such a list, Don. Was there a 5.5 sometime in our past? ABC listed that as being the strongest quake to hit our region in recorded history. It would be interesting if such quakes became more common going forward (for whatever reason including higher large rainfall events.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 1 minute ago, LibertyBell said: Didn't dream of you having to put together such a list, Don. Was there a 5.5 sometime in our past? ABC listed that as being the strongest quake to hit our region in recorded history. It would be interesting if such quakes became more common going forward (for whatever reason including higher large rainfall events.) 5.3 is the record. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForestHillWx Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Buddy was hiking near Boonton and said the woods made some eerie sounds dung the aftershock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Just now, donsutherland1 said: 5.3 is the record. I saw that day in 1783 was particularly destructive with two foreshocks and an aftershock in addition to the main earthquake-- I take it none of the foreshocks or aftershock registered as 4.0 or higher? and I see that 1938 had a series of quakes a few weeks before the big hurricane too, wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 6 minutes ago, Cfa said: Anyone else notice a gust of wind (pressure related?) with the arrival of the quake? I’ve heard this from multiple people in both NY and NJ. The glass door of the building I was in blew open and the roof made the loudest creakiest noise, like it wanted to collapse. I thought a helicopter or small plane struck the roof or something else nearby (I was near ISP). During the 2011 earthquake I lived in Queens, multiple stories in the air, my bed was bouncing and the building started swaying in a way that was uncomfortable. One wall developed cracks. Another quake in 2016, in the Rockaways, with an epicenter about 30-40 miles offshore. It was less than a 3.0 but I felt it and saw things moving. Much weaker than 2011 or today though. This felt stronger than the 2011 quake (which was centered further south.) I felt that gust of wind right at the start of the aftershock, but then the wind stopped and the aftershock kept going lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycwinter Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 here in manhattan did not feel the quake or the aftershock, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cleetussnow Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 2 minutes ago, nycwinter said: here in manhattan did not feel the quake or the aftershock, My buddy in manhattan said the glasses in his cabinet were lightly toasting each other…lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Was this an aftershock or another quake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsPens87 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Just now, Allsnow said: Was this an aftershock or another quake? My buddy said it was deeper than the first 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRRTA22 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 1 minute ago, Allsnow said: Was this an aftershock or another quake? I'd say an aftershock unless a larger one occurs 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRRTA22 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 2 minutes ago, JetsPens87 said: My buddy said it was deeper than the first Yeah the 4.8 registered 5km deep and the second 4.0 registered ~9km deep. Interesting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsPens87 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 9.4km depth vs 4.7km depth for the first. Not sure if that has any implications? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 2 minutes ago, JetsPens87 said: 9.4km depth vs 4.7km depth for the first. Not sure if that has any implications? This is what Twitter said… 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCG RS Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 16 minutes ago, JetsPens87 said: 9.4km depth vs 4.7km depth for the first. Not sure if that has any implications? This is a good quick explanation: https://phys.org/news/2016-08-difference-shallow-deep-earthquakes.html In general the depth between two, from what I have researched, appears that it would not make much difference in the grand scheme. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 19 minutes ago, SRRTA22 said: I'd say an aftershock unless a larger one occurs Yep this recent one was 4.0. The one this afternoon was stronger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsPens87 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 15 minutes ago, USCG RS said: This is a good quick explanation: https://phys.org/news/2016-08-difference-shallow-deep-earthquakes.html In general the depth between two, from what I have researched, appears that it would not make much difference in the grand scheme. Great reference thanks 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forkyfork Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 i hope i don't miss any larger aftershocks while i'm away for the eclipse 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now