Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Two Mdt to high impact events NYC subforum; wknd Jan 6-7 Incl OBS, and mid week Jan 9-10 (incl OBS). Total water equiv by 00z/11 general 2", possibly 6" includes snow-ice mainly interior. RVR flood potential increases Jan 10 and beyond. Damaging wind.


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Nibor said:

Central Park will find a way to measure .9 

They should have had 1” on 2-27-23 but probably took the measurement too late after some melting had occurred. 

 

Data for February 27, 2023 through February 27, 2023
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
State
Name
Station Type
Total Snowfall 
NJ CEDAR GROVE TWP 0.4 W CoCoRaHS 2.8
NY RIDGE 1.8 SE CoCoRaHS 2.4
CT IGOR I SIKORSKY MEMORIAL AIRPORT WBAN 2.0
NY ISLIP-LI MACARTHUR AP WBAN 1.8
NJ NEWARK LIBERTY INTL AP WBAN 1.2
NY LAGUARDIA AIRPORT WBAN 1.1
NY JFK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WBAN 1.0
NY NY CITY CENTRAL PARK WBAN 0.9

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of NWS office inconsistency issues.  The NWS has issued winter storm watches for a general 4-8" of snow for the Poconos, Lehigh Valley, Sussex, Warren, Morris, Passaic and NW Bergen, plus the Hudson Valley N of the Tappan Zee, but the discussions from the Philly and NYC offices are somewhat at odds, with the Philly office focusing on the warmth of the ocean and easterly winds keeping accumulations
I think they're all scrambling, so it's not worth focusing on their discussions, but their maps with inconsistencies are worth discussing - just look at the boundaries along Morris/Somerset where the Philly office has LWZu0hR.png
 
sYU4Ii8.png

Hmm, an IMBY question, but think it’ll be that low for MMU?


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MJO812 said:

Same solution but less amounts. Onto 0z.

correct me if im wrong but don't the 18z gfs runs use the same data set that the 12z runs do so they're not necessarily the most accurate of runs. still a good looking run for what its worth. lets hope 0z comes in a hair colder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, North and West said:


Hmm, an IMBY question, but think it’ll be that low for MMU?


.

You’re by the airport right? I think you’ll be ok for 2-4/3-6; I might do a bit better in Chester with elevation. 

The ensembles have been rather consistent for our area. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You’re by the airport right? I think you’ll be ok for 2-4/3-6; I might do a bit better in Chester with elevation. 
The ensembles have been rather consistent for our area. 

Yup, and that makes sense. The airport is really low; I’m about 200’ above it. I think it should be an old timey north and west storm doing well out by you.


.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The depiction of the trailing shortwave juicing the primary makes me think of Nemo. The phasing of the energy that came out of the Great Lakes really juiced things up on the backside of that storm. 
 

edit: not saying we’re gonna see a nemo outcome 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Franklin0529 said:

Looks warmer then earlier run 

If the storm overall’s weaker it will probably be warmer. Easterly winds are warming up the surface from the city on E/S and heavier precip could help overcome the surface warmth but light precip wouldn’t do anything. And the lack of CCB behind the low means cold air won’t come back in with heavier snow. The CCB is a possibility if the mid level lows close off south of us but if not it’ll be minimal if any. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

If the storm overall’s weaker it will probably be warmer. Easterly winds are warming up the surface from the city on E/S and heavier precip could help overcome the surface warmth but light precip wouldn’t do anything. And the lack of CCB behind the low means cold air won’t come back in with heavier snow. The CCB is a possibility if the mid level lows close off south of us but if not it’ll be minimal if any. 

I get it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

If the storm overall’s weaker it will probably be warmer. Easterly winds are warming up the surface from the city on E/S and heavier precip could help overcome the surface warmth but light precip wouldn’t do anything. And the lack of CCB behind the low means cold air won’t come back in with heavier snow. The CCB is a possibility if the mid level lows close off south of us but if not it’ll be minimal if any. 

My thoughts remain the same. Sloppy inch or 2 for us. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, the_other_guy said:

why are you losing interest? just curious?  you have anything is last year? January looks nice and warm. this may be it for the month

Fair question. Don’t like the trends. Thinking it trends even lower. I don’t care if snow gets washed away the next day but could do without a gross slushy mix. Part of me thought we could see a 3-6, or 6-8 event by me but think the odds are becoming slim to none of that happening 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • wdrag changed the title to Two Mdt to high impact events NYC subforum; wknd Jan 6-7 Incl OBS, and mid week Jan 9-10 (incl OBS). Total water equiv by 00z/11 general 2", possibly 6" includes snow-ice mainly interior. RVR flood potential increases Jan 10 and beyond. Damaging wind.
  • Rjay unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...