Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,604
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

Jan 4-6 Coastal Bomb


Baroclinic Zone

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

100% agree. This has big amounts into W NE written all over it. These big ones do it everytime . You’d think some of these guys would get it after all these years. Kudos to Scooter for sniffing it out 

and Will too, and some other Mets for staying with it despite what models showed.  Meteorology not modelology.  Now lets see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
11 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

100% agree. This has big amounts into W NE written all over it. These big ones do it everytime . You’d think some of these guys would get it after all these years. Kudos to Scooter for sniffing it out 

I think "big" amounts are limited to under 18" anywhere you look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, there could be some amounts greater, but I wouldn't go there yet...trucking along.

I dunno, that little sucker last winter was in and out faster than this and there were widespread 14-17" reports. This is gonna be juiced and more intense. Jan '11 was a quick hitter too and I pulled 27". We'll see, I suppose. Every system is different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

I didn't sniff anything out...I think we were just saying to..

a) watch these srn interactions..

b don't let the NAM or GFS sway you from swan diving off any object greater than 100' tall. 

Scott, still days away, should I be following GFS now or that is still garbage till 24 hours before event?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 512high said:

Scott, still days away, should I be following GFS now or that is still garbage till 24 hours before event?

GFS is getting a clue.  Track margins have narrowed pretty significantly.  Even the amped GEPS are now offshore with track.  12z today should really hone in on that and we can than start focusing on the other details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Yes Will too especially with the idea to not use the globals until day of and use hydrostatic 

I'm definitely going to put some credence into the "juicer" hydrostatic runs starting today.  We've seen the Euro and GFS bumping up their output overnight and I think we see it continue today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 512high said:

Scott, still days away, should I be following GFS now or that is still garbage till 24 hours before event?

I would not toss any model really. Perhaps the better way of saying this is to not put as much weight into some models. The non-hydrostatic (meso models) as Will said last night are still in the early stages of being used...and have their normal amped up biases. But as we head through the day into the overnight..if they still are near the benchmark and the globals head that way...I might put more stock in them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Hoth said:

I dunno, that little sucker last winter was in and out faster than this and there were widespread 14-17" reports. This is gonna be juiced and more intense. Jan '11 was a quick hitter too and I pulled 27". We'll see, I suppose. Every system is different.

Like I said...just not ready to toss those numbers around YET...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...