Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

12z GFS Fantasy Range, hy brid storm brings feet of rain to SNE


USCAPEWEATHERAF

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

all true... however, systems of pure tropical characteristics are exceedingly rate up this far N and they are invariably transitioning to extratropical in even the best case scenarios - which, they don't have those exceptionally tight inner gradient cores when that happens... 

in other words, a 980 mb variation of Matthew at CC is probably more believable than one with a 950mb inner eye wall - ;)

'Course, i don't want to incur the wrath of a the storm zealots violated porn so - 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

It's all relative because it is butting into a strong high. You have quote the gradient verbatim. I would not focus on intensity. That said, I would not lock in something huge for SNE yet either. 

True, 1030 high to the east there. Pretty good differential, not '78 good, but solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

It's all relative because it is butting into a strong high. You have quote the gradient verbatim. I would not focus on intensity. That said, I would not lock in something huge for SNE yet either. 

Who's locking in?  I'm living in model world right now and enjoying the peep show.  :popcorn:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, dendrite said:

Just saw 6z...938mb in the Gulf of ME. A brief landfall into the Carolinas does a decent number on it.

yup - can't do both, folks. 

it's like, the only way people get Matthew ...or, what's left of it we should say ... is if it hit NC first ?  if it doesn't, the modeling theme has been to curve it too much. 

we just don't really have a solution here (yet) that has this thing rocketing due N like the love joys in the annuls.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

yup - can't do both, folks. 

it's like, the only way people get Matthew ...or, what's left of it we should say ... is if it hit NC first ?  if it doesn't, the modeling theme has been to curve it too much. 

we just don't really have a solution here (yet) that has this thing rocketing due N like the love joys in the annuls.  

I mean lets say hypothetically it hits the carolinas as a cat 3, or cat 4, I would imagine it still has enough gas to be a tropical storm by the time it hits us. I mean, look at what Irene was able to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

these skim jobs bring interesting Meteorology ... if that's what folks have in mind, this is looking better and better for you.  

If you had the pipe-rocket along 73 W idea in mind ... not so much, at least yet. 

Could still evolve that way.  But that bent-wire track guidance look to any track (regardless of model or ensemble member there is) is agreed upon by all ...it's just a matter of when/where the bend back more Ewards actually happens. 

it could be all wrong - IF IF IF the models are wrong on the amount and timing of phasing.  As is, the phasing is incomplete until eastern Ontario and the present idea of partial phasing/timging causes Matthew to respond to steering fields that are less than optimally angled more N... causes it to really parabolically move around us in a large number of runs and individual members.  

Plus, the storm enthusiast doesn't really want Matthew to gain that much longitude passing through the Bahamas...if it stays more N than NW in that vicinity, THEN... the trough more purely phases, LOOK OUT.  you got a straight N azz-hauler right into Worcester the whole way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...