TugHillMatt Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Hey Geos, if you could fill me on what the EURO shows qpf or snowfall wise for Toronto when it gets there, I'd appreciate it. Gotta split soon. Come on. You know Geos will. He is the man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Hey Geos, if you could fill me on what the EURO shows qpf or snowfall wise for Toronto when it gets there, I'd appreciate it. Gotta split soon. 0.67" of moisture through hour 48. 9-10" of snow. First map. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 NE sector. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE CHICAGO/ROMEOVILLE IL 1144 AM CST MON FEB 29 2016 UPDATE 1144 AM CST NO CHANGES TO HEADLINES THIS MORNING. HOWEVER...THERE ARE A FEW ITEMS OF NOTE AND CONCERN IN THE FORECAST PROCESS. AN EXTREMELY TIGHT THERMAL GRADIENT IS IN PLACE FROM THE LOCAL AREA TO THE UPPER MIDWEST...WITH 850 MB TEMP ON 12Z RAOB RANGING FROM +2 CELSIUS AT ILX TO -25 CELSIUS AT INTERNATIONAL FALLS. SURFACE COLD FRONT IS MAKING QUICK HEADWAY SOUTHWARD AND HAS PASSED THROUGH THE WISCONSIN DELLS AREA. STARTING TO SEE SOME LIGHT ECHOES ON REGIONAL RADAR OVER NORTHERN IOWA...LIKELY IN RESPONSE TO DEVELOPING 925 MB FGEN. THE BIG QUESTION TONIGHT REMAINS HOW FAR SOUTH THE 850 MB FRONT GETS BEFORE WARM ADVECTION IN RESPONSE TO APPROACHING WAVE FROM THE PLAINS OCCURS. THIS WILL DICTATE PLACEMENT OF WHAT WILL BECOME A NARROW AND INTENSE 850 MB FRONTOGENESIS AXIS ACROSS SOUTHERN WISCONSIN AND NORTHERN ILLINOIS OVERNIGHT INTO EARLY TUESDAY. STEEP LAPSE RATES...NEGATIVE EPV ABOVE THE FGEN AND ABOVE NORMAL PWAT VALUES ALSO ARGUE FOR HEAVY PRECIP RATES. GUIDANCE VARIES FROM FARTHER NORTH 12KM NAM AND NMM TO LATEST RAP AND LOCAL WRF MODEL FARTHER SOUTH. GIVEN THE INTENSITY OF THE FGEN RESPONSE TO THE TIGHT THERMAL GRADIENT...SUSPECT THAT QPF VALUES COULD BE A BIT UNDERDONE IN MUCH OF THE GUIDANCE WHERE THE BAND SETS UP. CONCEPTUALLY...THIS SETUP CONTINUES TO FAVOR A VERY INTENSE BAND OF PRECIP AND A SHARP CUTOFF SOUTH OF IT DUE TO SUBSIDENCE. DEPENDING ON HOW QUICKLY LOWER LEVEL MOISTENING OCCURS THIS EVENING...PRECIP COULD BREAK OUT IN RESPONSE TO STRONG 925 MB FGEN WITH POSSIBLE PTYPE ISSUES. HOWEVER...ONCE 850 MB FGEN BAND BECOMES DOMINANT...SUSPECT THAT IT WILL BE MORE OF A HEAVY SNOW OR SO SCENARIO WITH POSSIBLY SOME LIGHT SLEET SOUTH OF THE BAND AS 925 MB LEVEL GETS QUITE COLD. BECOMING LESS CONCERNED OVERALL WITH ANY SIGNIFICANT ICE ACCUMS FOR REASONS ABOVE AND ALSO VERY WARM PAVEMENT TEMPS IN MID TO UPPER 40S. SNOWFALL ACCUMS OF 4 TO 6 INCHES MENTIONED IN THE WSW PRODUCT FOR NORTHERN TIER OF COUNTIES APPEAR TO BE EASILY ATTAINABLE GIVEN NEARLY STATIONARY PRECIP BAND OVERNIGHT. I'M WORRIED 6"+ AMOUNTS COULD BE MORE THAN ISOLATED. ALSO CONCERNED THAT FGEN BAND COULD SAG FAR ENOUGH SOUTH TO BRING HEAVIER SNOW TO AREAS NORTH OF I-88 CURRENTLY IN ADVISORY BUT NOT ENOUGH CONFIDENCE YET TO INCLUDE THEM IN WARNING. IF HEAVY SNOW BAND DOES INDEED END UP CONFINED TO FAR NORTHERN COUNTIES AND INTO SOUTHERN WI OVERNIGHT...MAIN PERIOD OF CONCERN FOR POINTS SOUTH INCLUDING CHICAGO FOR A FEW INCHES OF SNOW ACCUMS WOULD BE ROUGHLY THROUGH MID MORNING TUESDAY. THIS WOULD BE AS NEXT STRONG MIDLEVEL WAVE MOVES ACROSS THE AREA...MAINTAINING FAIRLY STRONG FGEN AS DEFORMATION AXIS FORMS ON NORTHWEST SIDE OF DEVELOPING SURFACE LOW. WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR OBSERVATIONAL TRENDS AND MAKE A DECISION ON ANY HEADLINE CHANGES WITH AFTERNOON FORECAST PACKAGE. RC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hlcater Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 0.67" of moisture through hour 48. 9-10" of snow. First map. Me gusta. That map is a bit nicer to those of the south end. Particularly out west. But also isn't as amped as NAM/GGEM/GFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Can definitely pick out where the cold front is in Michigan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 NE sector. 12zEURO_022916NE.png Thanks Geos. Looks like the drier models are the way to go. Still should be a nice storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchaumburgStormer Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE CHICAGO/ROMEOVILLE IL 1144 AM CST MON FEB 29 2016 UPDATE 1144 AM CST NO CHANGES TO HEADLINES THIS MORNING. HOWEVER...THERE ARE A FEW ITEMS OF NOTE AND CONCERN IN THE FORECAST PROCESS. AN EXTREMELY TIGHT THERMAL GRADIENT IS IN PLACE FROM THE LOCAL AREA TO THE UPPER MIDWEST...WITH 850 MB TEMP ON 12Z RAOB RANGING FROM +2 CELSIUS AT ILX TO -25 CELSIUS AT INTERNATIONAL FALLS. SURFACE COLD FRONT IS MAKING QUICK HEADWAY SOUTHWARD AND HAS PASSED THROUGH THE WISCONSIN DELLS AREA. STARTING TO SEE SOME LIGHT ECHOES ON REGIONAL RADAR OVER NORTHERN IOWA...LIKELY IN RESPONSE TO DEVELOPING 925 MB FGEN. THE BIG QUESTION TONIGHT REMAINS HOW FAR SOUTH THE 850 MB FRONT GETS BEFORE WARM ADVECTION IN RESPONSE TO APPROACHING WAVE FROM THE PLAINS OCCURS. THIS WILL DICTATE PLACEMENT OF WHAT WILL BECOME A NARROW AND INTENSE 850 MB FRONTOGENESIS AXIS ACROSS SOUTHERN WISCONSIN AND NORTHERN ILLINOIS OVERNIGHT INTO EARLY TUESDAY. STEEP LAPSE RATES...NEGATIVE EPV ABOVE THE FGEN AND ABOVE NORMAL PWAT VALUES ALSO ARGUE FOR HEAVY PRECIP RATES. GUIDANCE VARIES FROM FARTHER NORTH 12KM NAM AND NMM TO LATEST RAP AND LOCAL WRF MODEL FARTHER SOUTH. GIVEN THE INTENSITY OF THE FGEN RESPONSE TO THE TIGHT THERMAL GRADIENT...SUSPECT THAT QPF VALUES COULD BE A BIT UNDERDONE IN MUCH OF THE GUIDANCE WHERE THE BAND SETS UP. CONCEPTUALLY...THIS SETUP CONTINUES TO FAVOR A VERY INTENSE BAND OF PRECIP AND A SHARP CUTOFF SOUTH OF IT DUE TO SUBSIDENCE. DEPENDING ON HOW QUICKLY LOWER LEVEL MOISTENING OCCURS THIS EVENING...PRECIP COULD BREAK OUT IN RESPONSE TO STRONG 925 MB FGEN WITH POSSIBLE PTYPE ISSUES. HOWEVER...ONCE 850 MB FGEN BAND BECOMES DOMINANT...SUSPECT THAT IT WILL BE MORE OF A HEAVY SNOW OR SO SCENARIO WITH POSSIBLY SOME LIGHT SLEET SOUTH OF THE BAND AS 925 MB LEVEL GETS QUITE COLD. BECOMING LESS CONCERNED OVERALL WITH ANY SIGNIFICANT ICE ACCUMS FOR REASONS ABOVE AND ALSO VERY WARM PAVEMENT TEMPS IN MID TO UPPER 40S. SNOWFALL ACCUMS OF 4 TO 6 INCHES MENTIONED IN THE WSW PRODUCT FOR NORTHERN TIER OF COUNTIES APPEAR TO BE EASILY ATTAINABLE GIVEN NEARLY STATIONARY PRECIP BAND OVERNIGHT. I'M WORRIED 6"+ AMOUNTS COULD BE MORE THAN ISOLATED. ALSO CONCERNED THAT FGEN BAND COULD SAG FAR ENOUGH SOUTH TO BRING HEAVIER SNOW TO AREAS NORTH OF I-88 CURRENTLY IN ADVISORY BUT NOT ENOUGH CONFIDENCE YET TO INCLUDE THEM IN WARNING. IF HEAVY SNOW BAND DOES INDEED END UP CONFINED TO FAR NORTHERN COUNTIES AND INTO SOUTHERN WI OVERNIGHT...MAIN PERIOD OF CONCERN FOR POINTS SOUTH INCLUDING CHICAGO FOR A FEW INCHES OF SNOW ACCUMS WOULD BE ROUGHLY THROUGH MID MORNING TUESDAY. THIS WOULD BE AS NEXT STRONG MIDLEVEL WAVE MOVES ACROSS THE AREA...MAINTAINING FAIRLY STRONG FGEN AS DEFORMATION AXIS FORMS ON NORTHWEST SIDE OF DEVELOPING SURFACE LOW. WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR OBSERVATIONAL TRENDS AND MAKE A DECISION ON ANY HEADLINE CHANGES WITH AFTERNOON FORECAST PACKAGE. RC He's throwing us southern folks a bone, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 HRRR continues to bump north with the FGEN, there is very little support remaining for those further south so i wouldn't get your hopes up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmc76 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 3.2 over and under for ORD is gonna be a close one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louieloy102 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 3.2 over and under for ORD is gonna be a close one!Would take the under barely there. These gradients seem to never favor the ORD area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 3.2 over and under for ORD is gonna be a close one!Easy under. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Like RC said you can already see the f-gen band getting ready to develop along US 20 in Iowa. For the record, the HRRR kept on moving the snow NW during that last storm, but that didn't happen. RPM likes south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Easy under. yep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinook Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Can definitely pick out where the cold front is in Michigan. Wind gust to 56mph near Alpena MI with moderate snow in the area. There must have been quite the blowing snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Like RC said you can already see the f-gen band getting ready to develop along US 20 in Iowa. For the record, the HRRR kept on moving the snow NW during that last storm, but that didn't happen. RPM likes south. rpm022916.png bustn' a nut face on that screen cap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Like RC said you can already see the f-gen band getting ready to develop along US 20 in Iowa. For the record, the HRRR kept on moving the snow NW during that last storm, but that didn't happen. RPM likes south. rpm022916.png lol his face screams confidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 I'm going to bump my range for Toronto a little to 6-9". Won't lock it in since we still got 24 hours to go before the first flakes fly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 bustn' a nut face on that screen cap lol his face screams confidence. He was making the face while saying the morning rush hour will be a mess. lol Front is entering the northern burbs of MKE now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Like RC said you can already see the f-gen band getting ready to develop along US 20 in Iowa. For the record, the HRRR kept on moving the snow NW during that last storm, but that didn't happen. RPM likes south. rpm022916.png That's the updated run? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 That's the updated run? Yeah. It is a bit south of the last few runs. This was 10am Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 bustn' a nut face on that screen cap probably my least favorite WGN met, always posing weird and horribly off snowfall maps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baum Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 I have a hard time ever remembering a decent frontogenic event south of ORD. They are almost always transient and end up stalling and dumping over S. Wisconsin. No meteorology just history. Edit: I'm riding the RPM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Smith Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Toronto 12-18 cm, London 10-15, Kingston 15-20, Ottawa 20-25 would be my estimates. Generally agree with the discussion I've read above, 8-12 inch storm for a zone centred on MKE-GRR-FNT, 5-10 potential for Chicago but with the mixing issues and tight gradient, could be more or less in some areas. Only looks like 1-3 inches for DTW to me, trending gradually up to 5-8 around PTK and 6-10 LAN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 I have a hard time ever remembering a decent frontogenic event south of ORD. They are almost always transient and end up stalling and dumping over S. Wisconsin. No meteorology just history. Edit: I'm riding the RPM i'm due east of ORD and couple winters back an fgen band played a huge part of a 19" marathon event IMBY EDIT: i'm riding the euro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 GEFS ensemble QPF. Looks like the average would be at or a little below 0.75" at YYZ. A few sub 0.50"s, a few ~1.00"s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 I have a hard time ever remembering a decent frontogenic event south of ORD. They are almost always transient and end up stalling and dumping over S. Wisconsin. No meteorology just history. Edit: I'm riding the RPM Yeah I can't remember a time either. Seen some pretty good ones hit far northern Cook before. GFS is the most accurate with the front so far, but even it is lagging time wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowcaine Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Thinking 8-12" for Toronto. Really depends if a nice deformation band sets up or not. There should be some Lake enhancement as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Yeah I can't remember a time either. Seen some pretty good ones hit far northern Cook before. GFS is the most accurate with the front so far, but even it is lagging time wise. Check April 10-11, 1997 if you want a good one south of Chicago. I'm sure there are more recent good examples. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Thinking 8-12" for Toronto. Really depends if a nice deformation band sets up or not. There should be some Lake enhancement as well. You know, I haven't even looked into that. Cursory look suggests it'd be cold enough, at least initially. Mesoscale models off of BUF's website not indicating much. Guessing inversion heights are too low or airmass is too dry. Still something to keep an eye on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.