Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,515
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    amirah5
    Newest Member
    amirah5
    Joined

Late December miracle early next week!?


ineedsnow

Recommended Posts

As long as the grass is..do you think 2-3 would cover it? Seems like 4-6 is needed

 

What?  Do you live in a field if 4-6" is needed to cover your grass?

 

2-3" on a snowboard would most definitely cover the grass.  In October when I had 1.5" it almost covered it completely, just the very tips poking out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yeah a very good wAA thump. A bit colder too. On phone, but that's what I see as well.

700 was colder too. I checked both 850 and 700. The WCB nose really produces good 6 hour precip totals. That would flip to sleet even into CNE and parts of NNE but a much better solution overall. Interior probably not sniffing freezing with that secondary low track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

700 was colder too. I checked both 850 and 700. The WCB nose really produces good 6 hour precip totals. That would flip to sleet even into CNE and parts of NNE but a much better solution overall. Interior probably not sniffing freezing with that secondary low track.

 

It definitely pushed the isentropic lift a bit more south and east and didn't get that good slug of WAA precip as far north in NNE, and then the ULL stuff is a bit too far north.  Still solid advisory event that would cover the grass (all that matters, haha).  But its definitely a little change in that regard.   Its going to bounce back and forth with those two precip features though as it has been the past two days.  If this is going to go the colder route, I'd definitely enjoy it going all the way south to get NNE into that deform banding and ULL stuff, haha.

 

Pretty much no matter what happens with temps, SNE/CNE will get into that strong WAA lift to produce hourly 0.1-0.15" type precip rates for a good 6 or even 8 hour block, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

700 was colder too. I checked both 850 and 700. The WCB nose really produces good 6 hour precip totals. That would flip to sleet even into CNE and parts of NNE but a much better solution overall. Interior probably not sniffing freezing with that secondary low track.

Well that's good to hear about H7. It's just so hard for models to get a clue about these ejecting SW US shortwaves. They'll take years off your life if you bite at day 6. It's not a surprise the sharp swings in solutions for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that's good to hear about H7. It's just so hard for models to get a clue about these ejecting SW US shortwaves. They'll take years off your life if you bite at day 6. It's not a surprise the sharp swings in solutions for sure.

 

Are the swings in solutions though really that large in the grand scheme of things?  At least not at this time frame, but it seems like the goal posts are pretty much there.  Its just nailing down the real gritty details.  It seems like you could say POPS are near 100% and near 100% for at least some measurable winter precipitation for all.  But in like 50 miles you could go from 1-2" of snow/IP/ZR/RN to like 6-7" of thump. 

 

I think Ray's been on the right path with it going climo SWFE.  S.VT/S.NH/RT 2/Lakes Region areas thump hardest in these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are the swings in solutions though really that large in the grand scheme of things? At least not at this time frame, but it seems like the goal posts are pretty much there. Its just nailing down the real gritty details. It seems like you could say POPS are near 100% and near 100% for at least some measurable winter precipitation for all. But in like 50 miles you could go from 1-2" of snow/IP/ZR/RN to like 6-7" of thump.

At this point they are pretty much set but for some on the fringe these shifts in the track has some big implications to precip types and amounts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point they are pretty much set but for some on the fringe these shifts in the track has some big implications to precip types and amounts

 

Yeah I guess that was what I was saying.  Still won't nail those gritty details until like 24-36 hours, or even closer when we are in high-res RGEM and WRF territory.  But for the time frame we've been watching, the consistency has been pretty good amongst the global models.  Its not like two are showing a SWFE and one global is showing a straight cutter or shredded suppressed version.  For 48 hours now all three main global models have been showing a similar solution, just with slight ticks north or south (but those do have big implications).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point they are pretty much set but for some on the fringe these shifts in the track has some big implications to precip types and amounts

I guess if we are talking 200-300 mile shifts..... That's probably done.

Sensible weather wise, still a lot at stake. The strength of the high, positioning..... A shift of 75 miles or so means a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I guess that was what I was saying. Still won't nail those gritty details until like 24-36 hours, or even closer when we are in high-res RGEM and WRF territory. But for the time frame we've been watching, the consistency has been pretty good amongst the global models. Its not like two are showing a SWFE and one global is showing a straight cutter or shredded suppressed version. For 48 hours now all three main global models have been showing a similar solution, just with slight ticks north or south (but those do have big implications).

As well as I am, I thing the huge shifts are off the table and it's a matter of the heaviest precip shield shifting north or south

Sent from my iPhone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess if we are talking 200-300 mile shifts..... That's probably done.

Sensible weather wise, still a lot at stake. The strength of the high, positioning..... A shift of 75 miles or so means a lot.

 

As much as we'd like, we aren't going to get the global models to agree on distances of that scale at this lead time.  They have been pretty darn consistent at the synoptic scale at Day 4 to Day 7 that we've been watching it.  Just slight timing differences with the ejecting energy and the high pressure interaction.

 

Anyway, tomorrow and Sunday we'll start to get the players better sampled.  I know that's a weenie phrase, but I don't think it can be overlooked that once all the players are on the field it'll really narrow the goal-posts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as we'd like, we aren't going to get the global models to agree on distances of that scale at this lead time. They have been pretty darn consistent at the synoptic scale at Day 4 to Day 7 that we've been watching it. Just slight timing differences with the ejecting energy and the high pressure interaction.

Anyway, tomorrow and Sunday we'll start to get the players better sampled. I know that's a weenie phrase, but I don't think it can be overlooked that once all the players are on the field it'll really narrow the goal-posts.

Agreed. This seems like a kind of difficult setup to really narrow down specifics. You have the timing of both the system and the high playing key roles. How those two things ultimately interact will determine who gets what.

Do I get an inch of slop of do I get a good 3-5" thump.... Still up in the air

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are the swings in solutions though really that large in the grand scheme of things? At least not at this time frame, but it seems like the goal posts are pretty much there. Its just nailing down the real gritty details. It seems like you could say POPS are near 100% and near 100% for at least some measurable winter precipitation for all. But in like 50 miles you could go from 1-2" of snow/IP/ZR/RN to like 6-7" of thump.

I think Ray's been on the right path with it going climo SWFE. S.VT/S.NH/RT 2/Lakes Region areas thump hardest in these.

That's a pretty sizeable change in 12hrs from 00z to 12z IMO. We expect changes this far out, but all features changes rather significantly I thought. However, that's not unheard of with these setups, so you can't say it's not common. I've seen these changes before and way closer than 108 hrs out. It's a pretty awesome display of behavior between the ULL in TX and the confluence in srn Canada. It's beautiful to watch how they relate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3-6, 4-8"....worst case 2-5" for my area.

 

Don't go nuts in the outer direction either because we will probably see some over trending.... that is a nice high.

I wish folks would get a grip.

 

GFS continues theme of liking a zone from my area points west to about Ayer for naked twisty time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...