vance1167 Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 thank goodness we got the watch nonsense out of the way. it will keep the Nervous weenies from bringing it up every 12 minutes. Don't worry, they will post about their point & click/LWX's snow forecast changes non-stop like that will actually change what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Are we under a WInter Storm Watch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windman18 Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Mike masco on board. Forecast is for 6-9+ for most of the area. He also mentions that thundersnow and 2-4"/hour rates are possible. Anybody have any thoughts on the thundersnow possibility? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quasievil Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Are we under a WInter Storm Watch? Thanks for deleting the 5 copies of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Pimpernel Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Are we under a WInter Storm Watch? Oh, you took away Beethoven's tear! Thought you'd wait until Thursday and only if this event actually works out as currently indicated. On the other hand, this winter had a good, strong finish regardless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Are we under a WInter Storm Watch? Can't snow without one. BTW....was your post banter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowfan Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 If this fails I'm blaming you. You shouldn't have changed the avatar. Are we under a WInter Storm Watch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eskimo Joe Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 There goes the Winter Storm Watch, starting 7:00 pm Wednesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Mike masco on board. Forecast is for 6-9+ for most of the area. He also mentions that thundersnow and 2-4"/hour rates are possible. Anybody have any thoughts on the thundersnow possibility? It's possible but not a classic setup in the upper levels. Vast majority of our tssn happens with a closed upper level low (or very vigorous shortwave) to our sw and rapidly deepening cyclone to our east. There's going to be fairly strong frontogenesis moving through with decent vv's and strong thermal gradient. I'm not well versed with this kind of setup though. Seems at least some of the ingredients are there. Might be thundersleet with the front. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 It's possible but not a classic setup in the upper levels. Vast majority of our tssn happens with a closed upper level low (or very vigorous shortwave) to our sw and rapidly deepening cyclone to our east. There's going to be fairly strong frontogenesis moving through with decent vv's and strong thermal gradient. I'm not well versed with this kind of setup though. Seems at least some of the ingredients are there. Might be thundersleet with the front. lol March snows are dynamic though. I mentioned the other day that my only experience with TSSN was in a March setup like this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 It's possible but not a classic setup in the upper levels. Vast majority of our tssn happens with a closed upper level low (or very vigorous shortwave) to our sw and rapidly deepening cyclone to our east. There's going to be fairly strong frontogenesis moving through with decent vv's and strong thermal gradient. I'm not well versed with this kind of setup though. Seems at least some of the ingredients are there. Might be thundersleet with the front. lol Flashback to 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Can't snow without one. BTW....was your post banter? It was but Don't try to sass me again son. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 ^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 the pwnt is cracking me up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 It was but Don't try to sass me again son. Yes sir. Weather post: It looks like the NAM will cause more panic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Yes sir. Weather post: It looks like the NAM will cause more panic. Give all we know about the NAM and the fact that it goes against every piece of guidance, there will still be some who will panic, worry etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 0c 850 line crossing through DCA at 09z.... meh sleet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Yes sir. Weather post: It looks like the NAM will cause more panic. stop extrapolating too early Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
84 Hour NAM Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Just looks a little delayed overall to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 reverse nam'd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olafminesaw Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 hr 51 looks not bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozz Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Doesn't seem that different from 12z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongRanger Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 This morning Cantore was yakking about convective potential. He mentioned standard thunderstorms, but circled areas of predicted sleet... thundersleet. At least he understands this stuff, unlike some of his TWC associates who a few days before were agog about thunderhail. Yes, they actually said thunderhail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowfan Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 NAM sure does like to take baby steps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 reverse nam'd nah, high res is where it's at unless it looks worse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MN Transplant Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Same problem, warm way up there (700-750mb). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Doesn't seem that different from 12z it's a little bit better probably Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 NAM is now 24 hours away guys...cant use the 72-84 excuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 NAM is now 24 hours away guys...cant use the 72-84 excuse. could be right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 NAM is now 24 hours away guys...cant use the 72-84 excuse. I think we're using the fact that it's the NAM. I mean, there ya go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.