Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Feb 25-26 Discussion/pbp


Wow

Recommended Posts

I appreciate everyone being more specific with locations and dates since there are so many events/threats.

 

What is RDU looking like this week?  Looks like a chance of cold chasing moisture for Monday...  and then something later?

 

This will show you the NAM run...other models are on there too - http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=namconus&region=us&pkg=mslp_pcpn_frzn&runtime=2015022212&fh=0&xpos=0&ypos=0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

THe euro was really close to a hit for NC on Thursday morning. A large swath of precip slides just south of us. Now that this looks like a legit s/w /w the timing, the only thing preventing this from being a big snowstorm is the 500mb low sitting over New England. That is blunting this storm from turning the corner. If that is able to trend a  little quicker, that HP over the Dakotas slides down and the trough axis allowed to get a little more neutral/negative. This one should be interesting to track. The EURO was actually showing cold enough upper levels for snow in ATL for this one, however the sfc is too warm. Areas on the northern cusp would be snow as is (north of AHN to CAE).

I was just about to talk about the EPS...the storm slowed significantly on the EPS and comparing the maps on 12z Thursday, the 00z had the storm exiting already, where now on the 00z there's a decent wedge over the Carolinas on the mean with a suppressed low off the coast of SC...so while it is much more south and east of the mean low of the 00z along the coast, more cold appears to be in place and if it does actually get going like you're saying, I like the look.

 

12z yesterday

yZuNnyI.png

 

00z

KsocfjW.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and it would still be snowing pretty hard at 84. Besides the fact this is the fantasy 84 hour nam which is about as reliable as flipping a coin, the fact it's so cold is interesting since the runs of the euro that had the system this far north kept 0c 850s well north of this run of the nam. There is a very fine needle to thread here since if it trends very much north at all, it's likely all rain outside the mountains..except in nc where there is more wiggle room.

personally, i'm much more interested in tomorrow nights/tue system since it's not in the fantasy range.

Lookout,

At the very least if one even considers these two fantasies for N GA, I think it is wise to cut these totals in half based on past performance of this very wet biased model in these situations. Even so, it would still be giving ~1-2" on TUE AM and perhaps ~4-6" on WED PM. So, perhaps 5-8" total for much of N GA IF these two fantasies were to somehow verify with cut down qpf. The bad thing is that cold enough air is marginal at best and the very unreliable NAM is different from the GFS/Euro. OTOH , climo of very cold Feb.'s in N GA is actually quite favorable for significant 1-2 events based on what has actually occurred since the late 1800's. In addition, Niño's (especially weaker not so dry ones) have had a bit of a tendency to get something really nice in Feb, especially late in the month.

Regarding getting two snows 36 hours apart, there is actually some precedent for that kind of thing in ATL. 1982's snowjam is one example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lookout,

At the very least if one even considers these two fantasies for N GA, I think it is wise to cut these totals in half based on past performance of this very wet biased model in these situations. Even so, it would still be giving ~1-2" on TUE AM and perhaps ~4-6" on WED PM. So, perhaps 5-8" total for much of N GA IF these two fantasies were to somehow verify with cut down qpf. The bad thing is that cold enough air is marginal at best and the very unreliable NAM is different from the GFS/Euro. OTOH , climo of very cold Feb.'s in N GA is actually quite favorable for significant 1-2 events based on what has actually occurred since the late 1800's. In addition, Niño's (especially weaker not so dry ones) have had a bit of a tendency to get something really nice in Feb, especially late in the month.

Regarding getting two snows 36 hours apart, there is actually some precedent for that kind of thing in ATL. 1982's snowjam is one example.

or if somehow the NAM is right, which isn't likely, we could see widespread foot amounts in ATL and vicinity,
Link to comment
Share on other sites

or if somehow the NAM is right, which isn't likely, we could see widespread foot amounts in ATL and vicinity,

I'd VERY gladly take 5-8" (250-400% of climo and a pretty rare occurrence) and say it turned out to be a great winter after all though heavily backloaded. Don't forget the very impressive ZR just experienced in especially NE GA, too. I'm not about to raise expectations to 12" when that is extremely unlikely based on climo back to 1877 and is based on the qpf happy NAM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kids where out of school all 5 days last week [pres day Mon). We had to camcel church this a.m. because the 150 yard hill up to the parking lot is packed still solid with ice. Can't scrap it it's been so rock hard. 40 right now and you can see the cold coming back down through the Midwest and TN valley. This will fill back into the SE overnight.

But I want to draw everyone's attention to current radar. Look at all the precip over TX and Oklahoma. If you use the accuweather precip type it's all snow along and above the red river and moving east. That's all headed toward the SE and should be fun n games in the 24 to 40 hour period for a few back yards.

 

http://www.accuweather.com/en/us/southeast-region/weather-radar?play=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lookout,

At the very least if one even considers these two fantasies for N GA, I think it is wise to cut these totals in half based on past performance of this very wet biased model in these situations. Even so, it would still be giving ~1-2" on TUE AM and perhaps ~4-6" on WED PM. So, perhaps 5-8" total for much of N GA IF these two fantasies were to somehow verify with cut down qpf. The bad thing is that cold enough air is marginal at best and the very unreliable NAM is different from the GFS/Euro. OTOH , climo of very cold Feb.'s in N GA is actually quite favorable for significant 1-2 events based on what has actually occurred since the late 1800's. In addition, Niño's (especially weaker ones) have had a bit of a tendency to get something really nice in Feb, especially late in the month.

Regarding getting two snows 36 hours apart, there is actually some precedent for that kind of thing in ATL. 1982's snowjam is one example.

I agree about the totals.  In my mind at least the question is if the nam is right with how much precip falls since pretty much every model is drier than the nam. That said, the good news is there has been a general wetter trend with this on every model and we still have time for the other models to catch up to it

 

Looking at soundings on the gfs and other models in general, i think it will be cold enough since most of the modeling agrees on the level of cold air advection at the surface and aloft. .There appears to be just enough caa tomorrow  that whatever falls will probably be mostly frozen along and north of highway 78, while areas down toward i-20/south of atlanta and athens could start off as a mix, it should changeover before ending at least. this is assuming of course there is actually a fair bit of precip falling. 

 

As for the second system, the nam is by itself with how cold and how far north the precip is. Which is normally not a good sign.

 

I was too young to remember 1982 so I  don't think i can recall having back to back accumulating snows here so if it were to happen it would be really unusual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd VERY gladly take 5-8" (250-400% of climo and a pretty rare occurrence) and say it turned out to be a great winter after all though heavily backloaded. Don't forget the very impressive ZR just experienced in especially NE GA, too. I'm not about to raise expectations to 12" when that is extremely unlikely based on climo back to 1877 and is based on the qpf happy NAM.

honestly, I would take an inch of snow and call it a decent winter. Of course I'd love a lot of snow, but all I've seen so far is some flurries ( not including the snow I saw in KY). At this point, this late in the season, we have to pretty much take what we can get. Just hoping we don't get completely shut out this week. That would definitely make this a horrible, horrible winter.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@60 on the 12z GFS you can see where it's taking a step vs. the 6z in the right direction. Still not looking as good as the NAM but it's a step which is all we need at this point. 

pretty big differences between the two for alabama/georgia/sc considering we are withing 36 to 42 hours of the next potential event. the rgem is sort of between the two showing at least some light precip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

honestly, I would take an inch of snow and call it a decent winter. Of course I'd love a lot of snow, but all I've seen so far is some flurries ( not including the snow I saw in KY). At this point, this late in the season, we have to pretty much take what we can get. Just hoping we don't get completely shut out this week. That would definitely make this a horrible, horrible winter.

 

I agree with your statement.  I would be happy with an inch or two to go ahead and close out Winter.  I wouldn't necessarily call it a good Winter by any means, but I can tolerate it based on November 1st and another small event.

 

The SREF is slowly ticking up around these parts with Wintry weather I see.  Aren't the SREF PLUMES/SREF as a whole heavily influenced by the NAM anyway?  So is it very good to use in a situation like this?  I remember when it shifted North with the low track for the last storm around the Southeast, everything else followed it immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...