All Activity

3.66” so far for today. Biggest event qpf wise in a long time.

About an inch and half here as it winds down...nasty day and a waste of a Sunday other than football

1.47” . May end up 1.75” + based on radar . Still at 48.7 Haven’t needed to use heat at all with the mild fall . We’ll see if the chill moderates on models this week for next weekend. As of now, it looks chilly with big CAA wind damage potential

Ooof Mark. Thats a terrible start

Up to 3.52” for the day. .

same stale line every year from you

That’s awesome. Well done capturing her on camera.

When is everyone going out to shovel & plow?

TWC says I should expect another 2 to 3 inches tonight

Welp, at least we'll be even with the rest of the division even with a loss tonight...would love for us to find a way, though!

My station either had a mechanical issue or didn't transmit to the web correctly. Not sure which, yet. Recorded 0.58" of rain, which I know is low. Other stations in the area recorded between 1 and 2 inches of rainfall. I'm guessing about 1.5-1.6" of rain here based on local stations and radar. That was a good, long duration, steady and beneficial rainfall.

Go NFC North!

Highs around 80 along the shore n inland here in TH on a S to SW light breeze. Awesome Oct day.

2.13" on my station

Looks like the back edge starting to come through NJ-over a bit earlier than forecast

Definitely comparatively less rain here in my part of Columbia, at 8pm 1.95” for the day, no complaints here

I’m tied for first in my pick ‘em league, so going with Atlanta tonight so I’ll have something to be happy about either way.

We pour!

Looks like I'm going to come up a tenth short of 3" for the event. 2.90" with not much more coming in per radar.

2.60 inches of rain. Great soaker.

2.62” so far.

Commanders ending …. just when you think you’ve seen it all ….. But time to move on to the Ravens game and learn what new way they can try to blow it inside closing minutes.

I only see one side here engaging in name calling, though....."defensiveness" is fine if you competently defend your position. I just presented a wealth of information on why I feel the mean convective forcing will be a bit west of what many may suspect this season, lending to some pattern variability....it was never addressed, instead followed by some vapid, mindless insults. I understand and accept the factors that may lead to a vey mild and relatively snowless season, but I don't feel that is reciprocated....if you disagree, then fine. Same crap last year, and the offenders never address the "L", instead perpetually resisting any opportunity for growth and opting to assume the same, close-minded approach yet again.