Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Warm is gonna win in this pattern, other than any rainy periods. Upper 70s- low 80s. Too warm too early for my liking. Why cant we just do 'normal' in early Spring sometimes lol. Right to late May/Early June weather. Fuck that shit.
  3. ^That world record of 134F in Death Valley from 1913 seems like low hanging fruit
  4. If someone asked me, I'd take a repeat of 91-92 styled El Nino. the 2nd strongest like that was 02-03
  5. Orientation doesn't matter much for weak events, either.....much more disparity in weak events....ie east-based events that were colder, and west-based that were warmer.
  6. I've heard the global temp anomaly temp today (or yesterday) is +0.897C. That's pretty crazy
  7. Not counting one KU in the mid Atlantic....I mean above average snowfall throughout the NE and colder than average.
  8. I think it's a combination of the fact that there is so much excess heat in extreme warm ENSO, and it impacts the Atlantic STJ in such a manner that is very hostile to high latitude blocking. I'd have to look back at the research to double check..been a minute.
  9. I knew you would call sample size Well, once we get a big NE winter with a 2.1+ El Niño, I'll capitulate.
  10. No argument there....highly doubt it averages negative for the season next year.
  11. But why would the same thing change if it's 0.5 or 2.0?
  12. Not enough examples. 91-92 is the only west-based event 2.0 or greater. 15-16 was the only basin wide. 0/1 and 0/1.. the rest were east-based
  13. I'm not arguing the pattern doesn't look different....I'm arguing it doesn't really matter if ENSO gets that powerful.
  14. No, until you find me a +ENSO north of 2.0 that offered a favorable outcome for winter enthusiasts, it's factual.
  15. Most strong events have the N. Pacific low further east.. over the North Pacific High region. You can see by that composite that the N. pacific low was actually pretty west that Winter.
  16. Most strong El Niño events give you +PNA....excessively strong El Ninio usually has a dearth if high. latitude blocking.....again, not surprising.
  17. NOUS61 KPHI 301225 FTMDIX Message Date: Mar 30 2026 12:25:12 Critical maintenance will be conducted at KDIX through April 3. The radar will be down from approximately 12 to 21Z daily through Friday.
  18. We are still in that +1-5 year from Solar Max window. You will say the NAO wasn't that bad last Winter, but the average of the last 14 months is very ++
  19. That 2.0 stuff is superstition. Mechanics of something doesn't change if it gets stronger. If a car that normally drives 40mph goes 100mph, it goes 100mph, not more left or right.
  20. I don't agree.. the forcing is on where the Hadley Cell and mid latitude cell meet, and that forcing is north of the El Nino.. west-based strong event gives you strong +PNA. You can actually see by the composite of that cold season that we did get +PNA, it was just mixed with +EPO/+AO/+NAO
  21. This has worked out great for the last 5 months... this is April before a later in the year El Nino March 2026 is going to beat 2012 as the warmest March on record for CONUS. The heat lingered in 2012: This is what my April forecast would look like
  22. NAO is probably going to be crucial this year, assuming ENSO does remain at or below 2.0, which I believe that it will.
  23. Looking a the data, 2.0 is a pretty crucial threshold....you still have a fighting chance until you get over 2.0, then it's lights out. 1957 halted right at 2.0.
  24. I don't understand why it's so surprising that 1991-1992 was warm because it was such a a powerful El Niño, hardly weaker than 2015. It doesn't matter whether it's east or west when it gets over 2.0. It was significantly more powerful than 2009 and 2002.
  25. 67 here for the high. Sweating a bit while walking our very energetic dog
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...