Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. The high resolution models can pick up on them but the issue here is the higher mountains in our area are southwest and in this case south of the thermal boundary that sets up. The high resolution do show more snow on Catoctin and parrs ridge in Maryland.
  3. I don’t agree with the argument but some argue C02 concentration are cyclical. Look I’m on your side I just don’t want to muddy the snow argument because what’s causing the warming doesn’t matter to the is the warming hurting our snowfall argument. Those 2 debates can be severed.
  4. Increasingly likely that ORD is headed for the lowest snow totals in February since 2017 and would be in the top 10 for lowest snowfall totals. Pretty interesting stuff.
  5. 47 / 24 here - warmest since Jan 22nd (49)
  6. EPS 5 day mean temp anomaly and total run snowfall. There will be chances.
  7. The airmass today is actually pretty cold - seasonably cold at least. And yet the warmer spots in the City will tickle 50 and places like Poughkeepsie and Hartford will near or exceed 40. Classic winter feel in the mountains with springtime in the valleys.
  8. Car reads 51 at Lal Bean in Mechanicsburg. It’s like Christmas Eve out today.
  9. I thought your language was good. And I'm not trying to talk down - there's plenty I don't know. It's just that at quick glance the plot and summary give the impression that warmer temps cause less snow.
  10. Because this board/thread is for upcoming threats per title and there is a separate forum for it. So just like we don't go into the climate change forum to discuss storm threats in the coming weeks, we don't come into this forum to argue over climate change issues. Plus, it inevitably leads to unnecessary arguments.
  11. 45 here lots of melting today especially with the stronger sun-got into the car and it was warm inside for a change.
  12. Was in Marshfield earlier for an open house. Flurries. Staying safe
  13. We are an atmospheric science board so why is it suddenly controversial to discus a whole field of it? Seriously it’s like saying we couldn’t discuss 500mb height maps or vort maps because they’re “political”. They both directly impact our storms and climate zones. It is what it is
  14. My apologies! I intended to like your post and just realized that I did not. Sorry about that!!!
  15. I suspect elevation will play a role in this one....some valley locales may struggle to accumulate. I suspect a slushy 2 inches above 600ft and less than an inch below 400 feet
  16. It’s been like 6hrs straight of flurries today. lol
  17. Because we tried every variety of chips…and porn…now we are bored
  18. going to be a gradient, hopefully we are on the snow/ice side rather than ice/rain side.. C
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...