Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,029
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

October Comes Early: Late September Multi-Hazard Hybrid Storm


WxWatcher007
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

In my defense (lol) that idea kind of worked out. Big rains were confined to a small area, it just happened to be over me. Look at CT. Kev doesn’t even have an inch 

Small area? A large area. Unless it's a hurricane you're not getting an entire state flooded .

Screenshot_20260927_105658_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Sure. But that was 76 years ago. Those clearly don't walk through the door often. A good tropical storm could bring inland winds. Outside of that, or the extreme event you mention, it probably ain't happening inland. 

I'm talking about legit 60+ mph frequent gusts, not a wintertime fropa that brings strong but sub-severe gusts. 

Yet you could lop off 20mph from 1950 and it'd still best this. Didn't CON hit 110 ? Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Did they? Damn :lol: 

Nobody is saying this is historic, btw. It's not even top 25 for fall nor'easters probably. It's just a solid storm breaking the monotony. 

IxSz0ET.gif

CON 110mph
EWR 108
HFD 100
NYC 94
BDR 88
ALB 83
HVN 77

https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/78/11/1520-0493_1950_078_0204_tdson_2_0_co_2.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, vortex95 said:

Fallacious argument. 

The trouble w/ the "ppl are dying!" argument is that it essentially dictates that anything less than death is trivial and not worth discussing.  That is among the most vapid and intellectually lazy rebuttals around.

Can you objectively say these fatalities would not have occurred anyway if there were more reaonsble and less-hyped warnings?

Not every fatality is due to not enough warnings or alerts.  Many ppl will ignore warnings and go out/take risks despite warnings b/c they have become apathetic to the relentless hype.   Some ppl just plain resist authority/being told what to do.  And some do take warnings seriously, stay home, and a tree crashes into their home, causing a fatality.  All the warnings in the world is not going to prevent something like that from happening.

So I would avoid the high-horse, virtue signaling here and understand that more is not always better and things are not a simple 1-1 correlation when it comes to complex societal issues.
 

Que?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Did they? Damn :lol: 

Nobody is saying this is historic, btw. It's not even top 25 for fall nor'easters probably. It's just a solid storm breaking the monotony. 

IxSz0ET.gif

Didn’t the 1950 storm happen in November? Seems like an apples to oranges comparison.

Not sure if this type of record keeping exists but would like to see where this storm ranks in terms of September nor’easters. Probably hard to track that given the number or remnant tropical, subtropical, and hybrid systems there are this time of year.

I feel like most official forecasts were within reason. It’s the social media clickbait posting 90 MPH gusts on the RRFS-A that kind of leak into the “hype” narrative here…

Will be a memorable storm for many just based on rainfall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...