SnowenOutThere Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, George BM said: Sounding is in. Experts? From my 3000 course Atmosphere and Weather the only thing that fully stands out is the slight rightward nudge between 500mb and 300mb. Seems odd that’d prevent a mature thunderhead considering the abundant cape still present. Maybe the other piece is the hodograph which only has unidirectional shear up to sounding point 2? Will page some of our smarter friends to help out @high risk @CAPE @MillvilleWx 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
high risk Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Eskimo Joe said: Two thoughts come to mind: 1.) These are machine learning/AI-influenced CAMS that don't yet have the "database" of events to properly articulate when these events die off. 2.) As we saw with April 2011 and the 2012 Derecho, mature MCS complexes persist longer than meso guidance if the downstream airmass is sufficiently unstable. However, the lack of an EML or good jet streak generally isn't enough to sustain the storms much past sunset. There is an eight part YouTube video from Rich Thompson (SPC met) speaking a Univ of Oklahoma and he talks about this extensively. I cannot find the YouTube series unfortunately. None of these CAMs are AI-based. This event, like Saturday's, was mostly a burst of wind followed by a mostly narrow band of reflectivity. I'm guessing that this type of event is tough for a 3 km model to properly resolve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
high risk Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 10 minutes ago, SnowenOutThere said: From my 3000 course Atmosphere and Weather the only thing that fully stands out is the slight rightward nudge between 500mb and 300mb. Seems odd that’d prevent a mature thunderhead considering the abundant cape still present. Maybe the other piece is the hodograph which only has unidirectional shear up to sounding point 2? Will page some of our smarter friends to help out @high risk @CAPE @MillvilleWx It's a fair question, especially given that there is more shear in that profile than I was expecting to see. The warm layer you mentioned might indeed have been a factor. I'd also note that the surface dew point doesn't seem to be representative of the moisture in the low levels, so a mixed layer parcel, while still having some CAPE, would not be able to generate as strong of an updraft. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex95 Posted 58 minutes ago Share Posted 58 minutes ago 31 minutes ago, George BM said: Sounding is in. Experts? As noted in previous posts, odd for temps in the 90s and DPs 70 It acted more like a cool season line of gusty heavy showers. 00z analyzed NAM 1000-500 thk for DCA was 577, so that usually means 50k CB tops easy and lots of LTG. Peak mid-level lapse rates on the 00z IAD sounding were 7.0 C/km between 700-500 and CAPE at mid-levels was "fat." That should have lead to solid charge separation in the supercooled water level for lots of LTG. K-index 36, so not dry aloft. Sfc T-Td spreads around 25 so not too dry at low levels. Yet things were very outflow-ish. Storm cores should have been "meatier" for the lack of a better term! The thing that stands out in the sounding is the lack of solid deep layer shear, so that likely precluded stronger coherent cells or a more solid/thicker SQLN. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
high risk Posted 36 minutes ago Share Posted 36 minutes ago 19 minutes ago, vortex95 said: The thing that stands out in the sounding is the lack of solid deep layer shear, so that likely precluded stronger coherent cells or a more solid/thicker SQLN. I think you're on the right track here, but the mid-level flow was better than modeled. I suspect that the paltry winds at the upper levels limited the strength of the updraft. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George BM Posted 21 minutes ago Share Posted 21 minutes ago 11 minutes ago, high risk said: I think you're on the right track here, but the mid-level flow was better than modeled. I suspect that the paltry winds at the upper levels limited the strength of the updraft. That combined w/ that warmer ~400mb layer preventing the updrafts from really getting up towards the EL would be my non-redtag hypothesis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowenOutThere Posted 14 minutes ago Share Posted 14 minutes ago 46 minutes ago, high risk said: It's a fair question, especially given that there is more shear in that profile than I was expecting to see. The warm layer you mentioned might indeed have been a factor. I'd also note that the surface dew point doesn't seem to be representative of the moisture in the low levels, so a mixed layer parcel, while still having some CAPE, would not be able to generate as strong of an updraft. 34 minutes ago, vortex95 said: As noted in previous posts, odd for temps in the 90s and DPs 70 It acted more like a cool season line of gusty heavy showers. 00z analyzed NAM 1000-500 thk for DCA was 577, so that usually means 50k CB tops easy and lots of LTG. Peak mid-level lapse rates on the 00z IAD sounding were 7.0 C/km between 700-500 and CAPE at mid-levels was "fat." That should have lead to solid charge separation in the supercooled water level for lots of LTG. K-index 36, so not dry aloft. Sfc T-Td spreads around 25 so not too dry at low levels. Yet things were very outflow-ish. Storm cores should have been "meatier" for the lack of a better term! The thing that stands out in the sounding is the lack of solid deep layer shear, so that likely precluded stronger coherent cells or a more solid/thicker SQLN. 11 minutes ago, high risk said: I think you're on the right track here, but the mid-level flow was better than modeled. I suspect that the paltry winds at the upper levels limited the strength of the updraft. 1 minute ago, George BM said: That combined w/ that warmer ~400mb layer preventing the updrafts from really getting up towards the EL would be my non-redtag hypothesis. Thanks to everyone for responding! Adding to this discussion with the echo tops and visible sat estimated from the KIAD radar. Seems to support the general idea of a low topped environment. Can see that one cell southwest of DC trying to reach upward, but the real visible edge of the storms as the low level outflow induced shelf clouds. What an interesting storm system; had low topped storms in a high CAPE environment and despite that had significant wind with it. Always interests me why a certain storm is a particular way. Also helped show me CAPE isn't everything I thought it is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now