Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,687
    Total Members
    11,691
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

The Jan 31 Potential: Stormtracker Failure or 'Tracker Trouncing


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

Even if we were to try and extrapolate past 84 you don't think that could climb the coast? Low looks tucked in a good bit at the end of it's run. Maybe i'm pulling at straws.

I don’t think it would have gotten it done. Better than 6z but not there. As Randy said, h5 didn’t look quite right.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Paleocene said:

Here is my pro forecaster analysis of what I want the NAM to look like instead of what it looked like. Move that trough west 100 miles, and tilt it neg.

image.thumb.png.294d16d8dfce652dfe79c5d5183b2388.png

Biggest issue I see is the lack of a return flow out of the gulf ahead of this system. Not really sure a north trend of the ull will accomplish much aside from being a clean clipper unless we get some kind of a norlun trough involved. The best runs were mostly throwing moisture back from the Atlantic…which would be awesome but basically requires bombogenesis.
 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

Based on all these posts about the kicker kicking the ULL out to sea, I think there's a bit of a misunderstanding of what a "kicker" really is and what role it plays. 

Some extra vorticity behind the main low doesn't really act to "kick" it east. The main issue is wave spacing.

If spaced far enough apart, there's little or no effect... the ULL is on its own and may or may not close/neg tilt depending on the overall trough/ridge orientation and/or any upstream blocking if any.

If spaced close enough though, they begin to phase and pull the ULL north, as has happened on 1/25/00.

But if they are closely spaced but not close enough to phase, i.e. poor wave spacing, the flow becomes flattened in between, making it harder for the ULL to deepen.

I think we've went over this before. It's not so much of a "kicker" but wave spacing.

We have failed many times in the past with wave spacing issues. I believe more so in a complicated Nina Northern stream dominated pattern. 

Thanks for the detailed explanation. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, baltosquid said:

Overall the ICON-EPS moves east and looks suppressed, although there are some definite tucks in there too. Hopefully the GFS up next doesn’t nod to the Germans.

We might need a 950 low to get moisture back to Frederick with so much dry air in place: https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=ecmwf&region=us&pkg=Td2m&runtime=2026012806&fh=99

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, bncho said:

Which is the more plausible option in your opinion? Trending the "kicker" wave far enough apart or trending the "kicker" wave close enough to phase?

Pacific flow is too fast to back the kicker vort off, so might as well bring it closer and phase to bring that sucker up north.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Some ass hair ticks at 54..lobe is just slightly west, but meh so far

Does the low being closed off over lake michigan on 12z at 60 as opposed to being more oblong and extended in the 06z make a difference or are those just lines and shapes at this point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...