Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

Jan 24-26 Weekend Snow and Sleetfest Model Thread Part Tres


H2O
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, bncho said:

HRRR likes the idea the possibility of some thundersnow (and then thundersleet) right before the changeover.

image.thumb.png.bd301f939c8f18b3e22cf9f1657779a6.png

Gotta love this. What are chances that a weather model is going to be able to identify a 15 mile wide strip of land where “thundersnow” will occur 36 hours before a storm starts?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 394
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

53 minutes ago, MillvilleWx said:

This is a snap shot of what I was talking about with the freezing rain sounding. This was near the beltway in PG county. You definitely don’t want this sounding to come to fruition. 
 

IMG_9966.thumb.jpeg.bcacfea978f850b8a2e2e1eec5a98b64.jpeg

Icon for some reason is way way warmer in the mid levels than everyone else. I assume it’s just a thing it does? Even in Cvill most soundings show sleet besides it. 

35 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:


This might just be vibes but in my head I could make a compelling case the GEM suite has been the most consistent the last 48 hours. I feel like it shot things way north first but still always have DC-north a compelling 6-10” floor. Idk what 500mb looks like

CMC and RGEM have lead the way with this storm since Monday. We all laughed at the CMC mixing back then but lo and behold it was right! 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Weather Will said:

WB 18Z 12K NAM and GFS showing the synoptic differences.  Hope GFS is correct.

IMG_7817.png

IMG_7816.png

Nam and gfs are both outliers in opposite ends of the spectrum. If you average them they cancel out and you get a decent solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JenkinsJinkies said:

18z and still no cave? Papers are going to be written about this…

The GFS has trouble with east coast snowstorms. especially with a tricky northern stream 

Some people have drawn similarities to 2/12/14.  The GFS wasn't on board until like 12 hours out. 

Which is to say.  i think its too cold 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
  • Weenie 2
  • Disagree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Internal model snow ratio map is even better than Kuchera. It’s very hefty with the front end thump. Wish it wasn’t at range, but something we’ll be monitoring is the QPF distribution on guidance to the lead up. If they stay juiced, that will be a major plus for snowfall and beating back the mixing line due to evaporative cooling in the layer between 850-700mb. 


IMG_9968.thumb.jpeg.7acfbbe4ab310770cbbeb6cfc365b206.jpeg

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
  • omg 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Internal model snow ratio map is even better than Kuchera. It’s very hefty with the front end thump. Wish it wasn’t at range, but something we’ll be monitoring is the QPF distribution on guidance to the lead up. If they stay juiced, that will be a major plus for snowfall and beating back the mixing line due to evaporative cooling in the layer between 850-700mb. 

IMG_9968.thumb.jpeg.7acfbbe4ab310770cbbeb6cfc365b206.jpeg

LWX practically states this in their disco but assuming that their better access to internal snow model ratios is part of the reason they are perhaps more aggressive than some of us think they should be? Fairly “simple” boom scenario compared to 10:1 maps of initially really strong ratios, heavy WAA precip, and a slightly too aggressive warm nose? Realize that’s all a lot to ask for
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...