Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,575
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

January 24-26: Miracle or Mirage Thread 2


mappy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Terpeast said:

The shaded colors illustrate it well. I think its an offset and they cancel each other out

Yea I see several offsetting thing. Less amped phases STJ wave more a stronger NS vort. Slightly less confluence to our north but less ridging to our south and a slightly flatter flow heading in. There is more than one variable. Can’t make definitive conclusions based on what one variable does. 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

Yea I see several offsetting thing. Less amped phases STJ wave more a stronger NS vort. Slightly less confluence to our north but less ridging to our south and a slightly flatter flow heading in. There is more than one variable. Can’t make definitive conclusions based on what one variable does. 

If we’re being honest with ourselves, the NAM is the solution we should all hope for. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Yea I see several offsetting thing. Less amped phases STJ wave more a stronger NS vort. Slightly less confluence to our north but less ridging to our south and a slightly flatter flow heading in. There is more than one variable. Can’t make definitive conclusions based on what one variable does. 

More upside with the latest NAM solution?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Yea I see several offsetting thing. Less amped phases STJ wave more a stronger NS vort. Slightly less confluence to our north but less ridging to our south and a slightly flatter flow heading in. There is more than one variable. Can’t make definitive conclusions based on what one variable does. 

Yep. Just wish we could get the less amped STJ wave without losing a bit of confluence which so far all runs have had happen at the same time. Either way Nam would be a sleet bomb and not a freezing rain bomb (for VA) which is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just going through the memory bank of similar WAA-driven events, I recall how amped the NAM suite was for the Dec 16-17 2020 junction. Their first runs at range scoured out any cold air at 700/850mb well to the northeast, an extreme NW outlier. They were the first warning signs for that event, and while the other (less amped) guidance didn't completely cave to their long-range looks, they did conform to its depiction of warm quickly scouring out the relatively weak CAD signature. That makes me wonder if the 12k NAM isn't completely off its rocker with its current depiction.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...