Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,624
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

“Cory’s in LA! Let’s MECS!” Jan. 24-26 Disco


TheSnowman
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Congrats you got it.

Horrible trends for us today.

One more bump and its sleets to Boston (a possibility at this point).

Bad mood so... .

Tomorrow disappointment 4 to 8 and a lot of sleet.

Cold and dry for 7 days.

Warm up and rain from a coastal hugger with a stale airmass.

SSWE fails and everyone blames GW and says in 1900 we would have had 150 inches in the same setup. 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So ...question for ..I don't know whom. 

These Kuchera charts, I guess a few minutes with Ghat GPT is all that is needed to get a reasonable model of how exactly they are coming up with the graphics.  But assuming that they are really just using the 10:1 ratios applied to modeled QPF ?  

In a situation with 15:1 below the DGZ regions, not being intruded by a warm layer.... does that imply adding to the Kuchera output?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Prismshine Productions said:

Do we even have a nickname for the RRFS yet? Seems we got one for all the others

Goofus- GFS
King/Dr.No- Euro
Skynet- EuroAI
Reggie- RGEM
ICONic- ICON (Looking at you Astronomer)
Uncle- UKMET
Nammer- NAM
(And I personally call the GEM "Ol' Timbits")

Sent from my SM-S166V using Tapatalk


 

It can get a nickname when it actually goes operational. The RRFS A on Pivotal has already been deemed a “failure” by NOAA and will never be used for official forecasts. All the FV3 (of which RRFS is one) based models are going to be replaced, unless I’m misunderstanding what I have read. The next version based on different physics is still considered even more experimental.

So maybe the nickname should be “cancelled”? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, radarman said:

Yeah noticed that.  Hangs back a band through here on Monday after ramping up QPF for the thump.  That's how we'd do 18"

Drop a couple tenths on Monday with those soundings. You could grab 3-5” of fluff with that. I hope it’s right but it’s not every model. 
 

Icon and NAM were less. Maybe a tenth at most. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

So ...question for ..I don't know whom. 

These Kuchera charts, I guess a few minutes with Ghat GPT is all that is needed to get a reasonable model of how exactly they are coming up with the graphics.  But assuming that they are really just using the 10:1 ratios applied to modeled QPF ?  

In a situation with 15:1 below the DGZ regions, not being intruded by a warm layer.... does that imply adding to the Kuchera output?   

The method uses like an average temperature of the lower troposphere to determine a snow ratio. I think in these situations with the very cold llvls below an above warm layer, yes the Kuchera method would "inflate" the output. The Kuchera method is so terrible...equally as worse as 10:1 maps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Masswx said:

As soon as I get a storm that would be good here Im probably gonna get screwed by sleet

As some others have posted, we are lucky we are getting this much for a SWFE.

Ordinarily they do not perform well in coastal plain, and they often end as rain, not sleet, for those closer to the south coastal areas.

I’ve seen as much as 6-8” wash away to nothing or almost nothing at the end in some of the more potent ones.

8-12” with sleet at the end isn’t the end of the world.

Canada actually being cold again has been the key this year. We have seen more favorable setups in previous seasons but no cold to tap into and we end up with mostly slop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...